Earnings call transcript: Deutsche Bank Q2 2025 beats forecasts, stock surges

Published 18/08/2025, 11:52
 Earnings call transcript: Deutsche Bank Q2 2025 beats forecasts, stock surges

Deutsche Bank reported its second-quarter 2025 earnings, surpassing analysts’ expectations with an earnings per share (EPS) of $0.72, compared to the forecasted $0.7106. Revenue also exceeded predictions, reaching $7.8 billion against a forecast of $7.75 billion. Following the announcement, Deutsche Bank’s stock price surged by 7.11% in pre-market trading, reflecting investor optimism. The bank, with a market capitalization of $70 billion, has demonstrated remarkable momentum, delivering a 128% return over the past year. InvestingPro analysis reveals 13 additional investment insights, including consecutive dividend increases and strong earnings growth potential.

Key Takeaways

  • Deutsche Bank’s EPS and revenue exceeded expectations for Q2 2025.
  • The stock price rose by 7.11% in pre-market trading following the earnings release.
  • The bank achieved significant growth in pre-provision profits and net commission income.
  • Operational efficiency targets are nearly met, with 90% of goals achieved.
  • Strong capital position with a CET1 ratio of 14.2%.

Company Performance

In Q2 2025, Deutsche Bank showcased robust performance, with a pre-provision profit of €6.2 billion, nearly doubling its performance from the same period last year. The bank’s net commission and fee income rose by 4% year-over-year. All four business segments delivered double-digit returns, contributing to an impressive compound annual growth rate of 5.9% since 2021. Trading at a P/E ratio of 11.2, the stock appears attractively valued relative to its near-term earnings growth potential. According to InvestingPro’s Fair Value analysis, Deutsche Bank is currently undervalued, presenting a potential opportunity for investors. Deutsche Bank continues to target a return on tangible equity (RoTE) above 10% and aims to maintain a cost-income ratio below 65%.

Financial Highlights

  • Revenue: $7.8 billion, exceeding forecasts of $7.75 billion.
  • Earnings per share: $0.72, surpassing the forecast of $0.7106.
  • Pre-provision profit: €6.2 billion, nearly double YoY.
  • Net commission and fee income: increased by 4% YoY.

Earnings vs. Forecast

Deutsche Bank’s Q2 2025 results outperformed expectations, with an EPS surprise of 1.32%. The bank’s revenue also showed a positive surprise of 0.65%. This marks a continuation of Deutsche Bank’s trend of exceeding market forecasts in recent quarters, reinforcing investor confidence.

Market Reaction

Deutsche Bank’s stock experienced a significant 7.11% increase in pre-market trading following the earnings announcement. This positive movement contrasts with recent broader market trends and highlights investor optimism regarding the bank’s performance and future prospects. The stock has demonstrated exceptional momentum, with a remarkable 92% year-to-date return and is currently trading near its 52-week high of $37.15. The bank’s overall financial health score is rated as "GOOD" by InvestingPro, with particularly strong scores in price momentum and growth metrics.

Outlook & Guidance

The bank confirmed its full-year net interest income (NII) guidance of €13.6 billion and anticipates continued growth momentum in its Fixed Income, Currencies, and Commodities (FICC) financing. Deutsche Bank plans to issue €15-20 billion in funding instruments in 2025, reflecting a strategic focus on capital efficiency and growth. Analyst consensus remains optimistic, with multiple upward earnings revisions for the upcoming period. For comprehensive analysis and detailed forecasts, investors can access Deutsche Bank’s complete Pro Research Report, available exclusively on InvestingPro, along with reports for 1,400+ other top stocks.

Executive Commentary

Richard Stewart, Group Treasurer, stated, "We are on track to meet our full year 2025 targets," emphasizing the bank’s strategic alignment and performance. CFO James von Moltke highlighted the bank’s focus on executing its strategy and self-improvement, while Stewart noted the bank’s diversified business mix as a key strength in a rapidly changing environment.

Risks and Challenges

  • Macroeconomic pressures, including interest rate fluctuations, could impact profitability.
  • Regulatory changes in the banking sector may pose compliance challenges.
  • Competitive pressures in the German market could affect market share.
  • Potential geopolitical tensions in Europe may impact investment sentiment.
  • Operational risks associated with ongoing transformation initiatives.

Q&A

During the earnings call, analysts inquired about Deutsche Bank’s capital distribution policy, confirming a 50% earnings repatriation. The bank addressed questions regarding its exposure to commercial real estate and outlined risk management strategies. Analysts also explored the potential for mergers and acquisitions, to which executives reiterated a focus on internal improvements and strategic execution.

Full transcript - Deutsche Bank (DBK) Q2 2025:

Moritz, Chorus Call Operator, Chorus Call: Ladies and gentlemen, welcome to the Q2 twenty twenty five Fixed Income Conference Call and Live Webcast. I’m Moritz, the Chorus Call operator. I would like to remind you that all participants will be in a listen only mode and the conference is being recorded. The presentation will be followed by a question and answer session. The conference must not be recorded for publication or broadcast.

At this time, it’s my pleasure to hand over to Philip Teuschner, Investor Relations. Please go ahead, sir.

Philip Teuschner, Investor Relations, Deutsche Bank: Good afternoon or good morning, and thank you all for joining us today. On the call, our Group Treasurer, Richard Stewart, will take us through some fixed income specific topics. For the subsequent Q and A session, we also have our CFO, James von Moltke, with us to answer your questions. The slides that accompany the topics are available for download from our website at db dot com. After the presentation, we will be happy to take your questions.

Before we get started, I just want to remind you that the presentation may contain forward looking statements, which may not develop as we currently expect. Therefore, please take note of the precautionary warning at the end of our materials. With that, let me hand over to Richard.

Richard Stewart, Group Treasurer, Deutsche Bank: Thank you, Philip, and welcome from me. Our first half results demonstrate clearly where Deutsche Bank stands today. We delivered a pre provision profit of EUR 6,200,000,000.0, nearly double the same period in 2024. Robust revenues reflect our well diversified business mix, with 74% coming from more predictable revenue streams in the Corporate Bank, Private Bank, Asset Management and FICC financing. Net commission and fee income increased by 4% year on year, in line with our goal to boost revenues from fee based and capital light businesses.

As anticipated, net interest income in key banking book segments and other funding also remained resilient. Adjusted costs remained flat. And as we intended, significant progress on our operational efficiency measures is offsetting business investments and inflation. Let us now look at the divisional developments on Slide three. All four businesses delivered double digit returns in the first half of this year.

Our diversified business mix is poised to perform in a fast changing environment, particularly as our focused investments to serve clients are paying off across the platform. Our Corporate Bank has a leading market position in Germany And with deep roots in our home market, it’s perfectly positioned to help clients capitalize on opportunities created by investment programs in Germany and Europe as well as the improving business momentum overall. The Investment Bank is focused on consolidating its position as a leading European FICC franchise, whilst Origination and Advisory is looking to grow market share, specifically in Advisory, aided by recent investments driving further revenue diversification. In the Private Bank, we are pleased to see the progress on our transformation reflected in the improvement in returns seen year to date. Personal Banking continues to drive efficiency through workforce reductions and branch network optimization, mainly in Germany.

These steps, combined with increasing digitalization, are enabling us to streamline operations and innovate our offerings. Asset Management stands to build from its diversified assets under management of more than EUR 1,000,000,000,000. And we believe it is ideally placed not only to serve German and European investors, but also to act as a gateway to Europe for global investors. Let us now turn to our progress towards 2025 delivery on Slide four, starting with revenue growth. Since 2021, we have achieved a compound annual growth rate of 5.9% in the middle of our target range of 5.5% to 6.5%.

Second, we have achieved around 90% of our EUR 2,500,000,000.0 target for operational efficiencies, with EUR 2,200,000,000.0 either delivered or expected from completed measures. Third, capital efficiencies have reached a cumulative total of EUR 30,000,000,000, already at the high end of the bank’s target range for full year 2025 and contributing to our strong CET1 ratio. We delivered another EUR 2,000,000,000 of RWA reductions this quarter through securitization transactions and already see opportunities to deliver further capital efficiencies in the second half of twenty twenty five. To sum up, our first half results demonstrate that we are on track to meet our 2025 financial targets, and we are fully focused on delivering them. In parallel, we are working on the next phase of our strategic agenda to further increase value generation beyond 2025.

Turning now to net interest income on Slide five. NII across key banking book segments and other funding was €3,400,000,000 up 5% quarter on quarter. Prior bank continues to deliver strong NII, supported by our structural hedge portfolio, while corporate bank NII remained stable, supported by the ongoing hedge rollover, loan income and a one off benefit from hedge portfolio optimization. FICC financing benefited from loan growth in the first quarter with strong lending margins offsetting FX effects. With respect to the full year, we confirm our NII guidance for key banking book segments and other funding of EUR 13,600,000,000.0 as we continue to see a tailwind versus 2024.

The underlying contribution continues to be driven by the long term hedge portfolio rolling over at higher rates and volumes, combined with stronger lending income in FICC financing and lower funding costs. Together, those factors more than offset margin normalization and FX headwinds. Looking at Slide six, which is based on the market implied forward rates at quarter end, we can see that our hedge portfolio continues to position us well. In the second quarter, we have further reduced our short term interest rate risk by terming out more of our deposit hedges, bringing the total volume invested longer term to around EUR $245,000,000,000. As a result, a large proportion of our future NII is now locked in.

And in addition, the absolute NII contribution of the hedge portfolio is increasing steadily year over year, while the long term euro rates remain above 1%. Let us now turn to quarterly developments, starting with our loan book on Slide seven. During the second quarter, we have seen loan growth of EUR 3,000,000,000 adjusted for FX effects. The underlying quality of the loan book remains strong with around twothree of clients located in Germany and Europe. While our loan portfolio in the Investment Bank has further increased in line with our strategic objectives, we have also seen slight growth within our Corporate Bank segment.

In the Private Bank, our focus remains on targeted mortgage reductions to optimize capital allocation. For the remainder of the year, we expect growth momentum in FICC financing to continue, while the Corporate and Private Bank are well positioned to benefit from the expected growth in Germany and Europe. Moving now to deposits on Slide eight. Our well diversified deposit book has slightly grown by EUR 4,000,000,000 during the second quarter, adjusted for FX effects. The strong presence in our German home market and a significant share of insured deposits continue to demonstrate the high quality and stability of the portfolio.

In the Private Bank, we continue to see strong momentum from our retail campaigns in Germany. We are pleased with the strong deposit levels in the Corporate Bank and the encouraging underlying growth in site deposits. Looking ahead, we expect further campaign driven growth within the German retail segment, while strategic objectives in the Corporate Bank are centered around portfolio optimizations. On Slide nine, we highlight the development of our key liquidity metrics. The liquidity coverage ratio at the end of the second quarter increased by around two percentage points to 136%, mainly driven by lower net cash outflows.

We continue to maintain a high quality liquidity buffer and hold about 95% of HQLA in cash and Level one secondurities. We are comfortable with our current liquidity position, but remain focused on further strengthening the resilience of the balance sheet and growing liquidity levels. As such, we aim to conservatively align our liquidity position without having specific external liquidity targets. The net stable funding ratio slightly increased to 120 with a surplus above regulatory requirements of EUR107 billion. This reflects our stable funding base with more than twothree of the group’s funding sources coming from our global deposit franchise.

Turning to capital on Slide 10. Strong second quarter earnings net of AT1 coupon and dividend deductions, combined with diligent resource management, led to a CET1 ratio of 14.2%, up 42 basis points sequentially. Lower risk weighted assets were driven by credit risk, benefiting from continued execution of capital efficiency measures, predominantly through securitization transactions during the quarter. Market risk remained flat. Increases at the beginning of the quarter, reflecting market turbulence at the time, have been offset through strict risk management and hedging.

Moving to Slide 11, you can see that our capital ratios remain well above regulatory requirements. The CET1 MDA buffer now stands at two ninety nine basis points or EUR 10,000,000,000 of CET1 capital. The 47 basis points quarter on quarter increase reflects our 42 basis points higher CET1 ratio and a five basis points lower systemic risk capital buffer requirement, where a reduction in Germany was partially offset by an increase in Italy. The buffer to the total capital requirement increased by 53 basis points and now stands at three seventy one basis points. Moving to Slide 12.

Our second quarter leverage ratio was 4.7%, up by eight basis points, principally driven by FX effects as higher Tier one capital was mostly offset by higher trading inventory. We continue to operate with a significant loss absorbing capacity well above all requirements, as shown on Slide 13. The MREL surplus, almost binding constraint, increased by EUR 1,000,000,000 to 23,000,000,000. Our surplus thus remains at a comfortable level, which continues to provide us with the flexibility to pause issuing new eligible liabilities instruments for at least one year. Before we turn to issuance, let me quickly refer to Slide 21 in the appendix, on which we offer our perspective on the bank’s CR3 disclosure.

As we have laid out in the analyst call yesterday, we have a strong and credible path to mitigate the potential impacts arising from the output floor. The implementation of CR3 is a multiyear journey, including several transitional arrangements that are subject to reviews and which will mostly apply through 02/1932. And we are not planning franchise changing decisions today for an outcome that is almost certain to change. Moving now to our issuance plan on Slide 14. Despite geopolitical tensions and macro volatility, credit markets remain resilient in the second quarter.

Our spreads developed constructively quarter on quarter, tightening by roughly 10 basis points on average in senior non preferred, allowing us to further progress with our issuance plan at attractive funding costs. We confirm our previous guidance to issue between EUR 15,000,000,000 and EUR 20,000,000,000 to meet 2025 funding requirements. With year to date issuances of EUR 10,900,000,000.0, we have already completed a little more than 6% of our 2025 plan with remaining residual funding focused on senior nonpreferred and preferred instruments. Since the last fixed income call at the April, we issued EUR 4,600,000,000.0, primarily in senior nonpreferred format. The most notable transaction during the second quarter was a €1,500,000,000 senior non preferred transaction, which attracted over €9,000,000,000 in total orders.

In addition, we issued a multi tranche Japanese yen transaction across both senior preferred and non preferred. Concerning our US1.25 billion dollars 6% AT1 secondurity with an upcoming call date in October 2025, we will take a decision closer to the call date at the October. Several factors will be taken into consideration, including capital demand, refinancing levels versus reset, FX effects impacting CET1 as well as market expectations. This security was issued at a stronger U. S.

Dollar exchange rate and hence would have a small positive revaluation impact at current FX rates. The coupon would reset around 8.5% at currently roughly 50 basis points above current market levels. In terms of the timing of any core announcement, we always need to balance the desire to provide the market with certainty as soon as possible against the loss of capital at the time of the announcement. We are still assessing whether we will replace the transaction. We’ll provide further details later in the year.

Before going to your questions, let me conclude with a summary on Slide 15. We are on track to meet our full year 2025 targets and remain comfortable with our trajectory to deliver an RoTE of above 10% and a costincome ratio of below 65%. Our asset quality remains solid. And despite uncertainty from developments around commercial real estate as well as the macroeconomic environment, we currently anticipate a reduction in provisioning levels in the second half of the year. Our improved profitability, sound risk profile and strong balance sheet was recognized by a rating upgrade from Morningstar DBRS in June.

In the same month, Fitch has raised our short term rating on the back of improved investor confidence and resilient liquidity. Our strong capital position and second quarter performance provide a solid foundation as we head into 2026. We have already completed around 60% of our issuance plan for the year and plan to issue primarily more senior instruments in the second half of the year. With that, let’s now turn to your questions.

Moritz, Chorus Call Operator, Chorus Call: Ladies and gentlemen, we will now begin the question and answer And the first question comes from Lee Street from Citigroup. Three

Lee Street, Analyst, Citigroup: questions from me, please. Firstly, on capital, you’ve obviously got a new operating range. Based on that, am I supposed to think of 14% CET1 as being the floor for additional shareholder distributions and 13.5 is the floor for your MDA buffer? Is that how I should think about it? That’s question one.

Number two, any thoughts on ratings and ratings direction from here? You’ve had upgrades from DRS and Fitch. Are you expecting anything else this year? And any comments on the changes from Moody’s relating to their request for comment and or the CMDI? And then finally, a bigger picture one.

You’ve mentioned on various calls in the past about playing some role in banking consolidation in Europe. Obviously, that’s alive and well. I guess at the moment, it seems to be a lot easier to do deals within one country rather than cross borders, I mean, just based on what we see. So the question is, do you think that DB will be involved in any form of M and A over the next eighteen months? Can you see any angle there?

That would be my three questions. Thank you.

Richard Stewart, Group Treasurer, Deutsche Bank: Thanks, Lee, and happy Friday, and thanks for joining the call. So I guess, taking your first question around capital. So what James and Christian were kind of saying yesterday was so that our distribution policy remains unchanged. So we intend to repatriate 50% of our earnings via dividends, share buybacks as we communicated. And this also applies in the case our CET1 ratio will be at the low end of our target range of 13.5% to 14%.

In addition, if we sustainably report and project a CET1 ratio above 14%, then this provides the flexibility for additional distributions. And when considering these excess capital distributions, we’ll make our assessment after consideration of projected business growth and the regulatory environment at this time, no different to what we have done in the past. And finally, in terms of share buybacks, they typically involve a three to four month regulatory review before they announce and we can execute it further. So I just want to make that point as well just in terms of timetables. And then what should be most relevant for fixed income investors, as you were asking about, is the fact that we have increased our MDA buffers steadily over time.

And now we’re around 300 basis points above CET1 MDA, which is much more in line with peers. And given our own views of the world, we kind of feel that, that gap will continue to grow over time. And then in terms of rating actions, yes, we’re very pleased with Morningstar DBRS upgrading all long and short term ratings for the bank at the June. That was based on continued progress of our strategic transformation and our general path towards medium term targets. Separately, fixed and upgraded our short term ratings.

We see that as proof of improved investor confidence and our resilient liquidity position. And we’re confident that the continued delivery of our target should result in further positive racing revisions over time from other racing agencies. Of course, we are monitoring potential ramifications arise from various industry related events. So obviously, there’s a Moody’s request for comment process ongoing, which the agency is seeking feedback regarding their banking methodology. But from what we can see right now, we’re not expecting any repercussions on the baseline credit assessment for ourselves.

And then on CMDI, there are still a few open items, including the availability of the final legal text. So delivery of that is still uncertain, but sometime in next few quarters. And then, that will take some time to transpose that international law. And then, we just will need to affect that in their ratings. But the sort of the long and the short of it from our perspective is our base cases, we do not see any impact to our senior preferred ratings given just the overall size of our senior preferred layer we have in stack.

That will be how I think about the ratings picture. James has joined us very kindly, so maybe I’ll let him handle the M and A. Question.

James von Moltke, CFO, Deutsche Bank: Sure. Thanks, Richard. Lee, thanks for the question. Really nothing’s changed about our perspective. I mean, point one, as you point out, we’ve always sort of subscribed to the industrial logic of mergers, consolidation, scale in the banking industry.

But we’ve also been consistent about saying that we were working on our own homework and improving Deutsche Bank before we’d consider anything. And nothing’s really changed in that regard. I wouldn’t sort of commit to a timeline. So you mentioned eighteen months. As time goes on, I think we feel better prepared as the company goes from strength to strength and we get through some of the investments and remediation work we’d be doing.

But I don’t think there’s any change in terms of our thinking that we want to remain focused on self help for now. As to your comment about cross border versus domestic, I’d sort of say right now unfortunately Europe is showing itself to be, I’d say whatever mixed about both. That if you look at the transactions that have been in the market, they’re being sort of there’s been national resistance to national mergers and there seems to have been politically political resistance to cross border mergers. So I’m not exactly sure what the preference is. You’d like to see a world where Europe genuinely wants to function as single market, that some of the preconditions are created in terms of the legislative environment, things like capital markets union, banking union, remove some of the frictions.

And then in essence, the political sensitivity around the role of banks lessens somewhat to allow that industrial logic to take over. And that’s one can still dream, but that’s hopefully the direction of travel ultimately. But nothing in all of this changes Deutsche Bank’s view that we just remain focused on executing on our strategy and focus on self help.

Lee Street, Analyst, Citigroup: All right. That’s very clear. Thank you both.

Philip Teuschner, Investor Relations, Deutsche Bank: Thanks, Lee.

Moritz, Chorus Call Operator, Chorus Call: And the next question comes from Dan David from Autonomous. Please go ahead.

Dan David, Analyst, Autonomous: Good afternoon. Congratulations on the results. I have two sets of questions two topics, I should say. One, CRE and the second just on AT1. So on U.

S. CRE, I guess, CRE and scope of the severe stress test has reduced year on year, so 16,000,000,000 to €13,000,000,000 A year ago, I think you said €12,000,000,000 was modified. What’s the figure now? And then a year ago, provisions in The U. S.

Book were six fourteen million euros so roughly 4% cover on the €16,000,000,000 or 5.1% on the modified part. Can you tell us what the cumulative provisions are currently? And just any color on the drivers of the reduction of the books, sales and redemptions would be interesting. Thanks. And the second one, I just wanted a quick one on the AT1.

If I look at your issuance plan, it says that you’ve done well, it says you’ve maybe got a little bit more AT1 to do. And you made reference to reset levels versus new issuance levels, guess, when you assess the decision. So should we assume that you need to print new AT1 to be able to call the October 30, AT1 that’s coming up? Or could you call outright? Thanks.

Richard Stewart, Group Treasurer, Deutsche Bank: Yes, sure. So I’ll take maybe the second one first, if you like. So yes, the answer is pretty simple. So I think on the slide, it shows we’ve issued €1,500,000,000 year to date. I think the range we kind of gave as guidance was part of the overall 15,000,000,000 to $20,000,000,000 of issuance was 1,500,000,000 to 3,000,000,000 across AT1 and Tier two.

The comments I kind of made in earlier, we’re basically just outlining, as you rightly said, that the current market in terms of where we are versus where we’d issue in terms of distance to reset spreads obviously suggests would likely call and also the FX risk that we were talking about at previous AT1 calls is also positive. So I think from our perspective and from a rational perspective and how we kind of guide before, I think it’s I think the market is kind of thinking about that the right way. And then in terms of what does that mean in terms of our plans around, if we decide to do that and where we want to replace, that’s really still our ongoing planning process around what we can see as internal demand for leverage, whether that makes sense. So no decision being made on that. So that’s why we’re still working through that process and we’ll obviously update you guys as soon as we kind of decide what we want to do.

But essentially, we need to make a sensible decision in the next couple of months or so.

James von Moltke, CFO, Deutsche Bank: So then on CRE, Ben, I’m not sure I got each of the questions that you asked, but I guess point one is the stress the portfolio reduces with pay downs and to some extent with charge offs. So there is a modest reduction in the portfolio over time. You saw that the stress test outcome is still €1,100,000,000 I think right now we’re showing cumulative credit loss allowance against that of €700,000,000 So it’s less than the cumulative amount of provisions we’ve taken because we’ve charged off against the allowance. We are I don’t have the modified number just to hand, but the modifications are slowing down. So as we have chewed through the maturities, the number of loans now still to be modified in the next say six months has declined to a pretty modest number.

And we’re working to extend the loans. Whenever there is a loan that can be refinanced or modified, the goal is now to extend and put them on a stable footing. And that if it

Richard Stewart, Group Treasurer, Deutsche Bank: gets to the last part

James von Moltke, CFO, Deutsche Bank: of your question, so are we taking action to sort of stabilize the portfolio? For sure. It’s through those modifications, refinancings, also sponsor support for the positions. But we’ve also as we did last year, we’ve looked at specific loan sales or portfolio sales and that’s something we’ll continue to do. So that over time we shape and manage that portfolio down.

So yes, we’re taking a series of risk management actions to sort of minimize the footprint. And as you say, the allowance level has continued to build over time against the remaining exposure. I won’t say we’re out of the woods. I said in yesterday’s call, it’s a little bit path dependent on each of the individual buildings and projects and sponsor behavior around those buildings and projects. So it’s something we’re still working on.

But again, to your question, yes, we’re doing what we can in terms of risk minimizing actions.

Robert Smalley, Analyst, Veritivitian: Thanks, Mike.

Moritz, Chorus Call Operator, Chorus Call: And the next question comes from Robert Smalley from Veritivitian. Please go ahead.

Robert Smalley, Analyst, Veritivitian: Hi. Thanks very much for taking my question and doing the call. Couple of questions. One, with respect to the results, the trading lines were very strong. Could you talk a little bit about investment banking pipeline coming up particularly in Europe for the second half of the year and if we’ll see that start to come through as well?

Secondly, we talked a little bit on the last call about NDFI lending and there is a lot of nomenclature issues around that. So specifically, could you talk about your lending to alternative asset managers and BDCs? And let’s winnow that out from asset backed products, etcetera. And then third, just as a follow-up on the CRE point, now that we’re starting to see more visibility around price, as you go through this portfolio, which is admittedly lumpy and has its own quirks, can we see a more accelerated timeline to get through this? And maybe in a quarter or two provisioning etcetera will start to come down meaningfully?

Thanks.

James von Moltke, CFO, Deutsche Bank: So Robert, I don’t have the pipeline broken down by Europe. We tend to look at it as on a product basis, but it’s strong. Remember that the most visible pipeline we have is either M and A transactions that are announced pending closure or where we are signed up and are working with the client to bring it to announcement and then closure. Equity pipeline, those two look strong in terms of mandated pipelines. But as you saw in the equity pipeline and is true also of the advisory pipeline, clients need to see stability in the markets kind of visible prices in order to transact.

And so there’s been a sort of delay and therefore an increasing backlog. As you’ve heard from us and other competitors, we like how the pipeline is shaped up and it’s stronger than it was this time last year considerably. But of course sort of transacting is a different question and there’s been delays and in certain cases transactions that didn’t get to market. The debt capital markets pipeline is much shorter term. So between from mandated from being mandated to transaction execution and fee realization.

There, you saw in the second quarter, really a stop for practical purposes. There’s a very significant decline in activity in April and then a recovery through May and June. So we do see that market as normalizing a little bit. And as we talked about yesterday, the leveraged debt capital market was especially quiet and we also stepped back a little bit in terms of risk appetite. So I think as we get through July and then after the summer pause, our expectation is that debt capital markets will also recover.

So we’re optimistic about how that can move from here. We also noted that there were some sort of transactions ready to close that we’d initially thought would close and sort of produce revenues in the second quarter, which were moved to the second half and in a couple of cases already closed in July. So that timing is also helpful in terms of revenue momentum in O and A going into Q3. I hope that helps. Although, as I say, I don’t have the geographic pipeline in front of me.

Robert Smalley, Analyst, Veritivitian: Yes, does. Thanks.

Richard Stewart, Group Treasurer, Deutsche Bank: And gentlemen, think there’s a couple of questions that Rob was asking about, which I guess was more around M and BFI lending. Well, think we have to get back to you with some sort of breakdown that you’re looking by. Off the top of our head, I think our BDC exposure is de minimis, but we can clarify that. I think we just need to, I guess, make sure that we’re talking on the right terms when it comes to alternative asset management. So if you don’t mind, we’ll come back to you offline on the response to that question.

James von Moltke, CFO, Deutsche Bank: And then on commercial real estate, I said to Ben’s question, I don’t know that there’s yet full visibility on pricing, have to say. I think what we see is weakness in certain geographies, but it is often idiosyncratic to an individual project where there might be leasing activity or the lack of terminated leases and so on that impact the value of a specific building. And we’ve called out the weakness on the West Coast. The current market environment give you an opportunity to accelerate a work down? It’s mixed, I’d say.

But as I said in answer to Ben’s question, we’re absolutely looking at alternatives to do that. But it is often idiosyncratic to individual investments, which makes it a sort of a granular activity. Our hope remains that this and expectation is that as we get more visibility into the economic developments, especially United States interest rates, and secondary market activity that the situation will ameliorate, we will be able to transact. Of course with that, the credit loss provisioning or the allowance can come down again.

Robert Smalley, Analyst, Veritivitian: Thank you. Thanks for the detail. Greatly appreciate it.

James von Moltke, CFO, Deutsche Bank: Sure thing, Robert.

Moritz, Chorus Call Operator, Chorus Call: So it seems there are no further questions at this time. So I would like to turn the conference back over to Philipp Teuschner for any closing remarks.

Philip Teuschner, Investor Relations, Deutsche Bank: Thank you, Marat. And just to finish up, thank you all for joining us today. You know where the IR team is if you have any further questions, and we look forward to talking to you soon again. Goodbye, and have a nice day.

Moritz, Chorus Call Operator, Chorus Call: Ladies and gentlemen, the conference is now concluded, and you may disconnect. Thank you for choosing Chorus Call, and thank you for participating in the conference. Goodbye.

This article was generated with the support of AI and reviewed by an editor. For more information see our T&C.

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers
© 2007-2025 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.