Stoner Cats NFTs Face SEC; Critics Question Settlement’s Legitimacy

Published 14/09/2023, 20:26
Stoner Cats NFTs Face SEC; Critics Question Settlement’s Legitimacy

  • SEC classifies Stoner Cats NFTs as unregistered securities.
  • Stoner Cats 2 (SC2) agrees to a cease-and-desist order and a $1 million civil penalty.
  • Critics, including Ripple’s Stuart Alderoty, question SEC’s settlement enforceability.

In its regulatory move against NFT offerings, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has classified Stoner Cats NFTs as unregistered securities. The company behind the NFTs, Stoner Cats 2 LLC (SC2), has “agreed to a cease-and-desist order and to pay a civil penalty of $1 million,” although it has not admitted or denied the SEC’s findings.

SC2 further committed to establishing a fund to refund NFT buyers, destroying all NFTs in its possession, and publishing notice of the SEC’s order on its website and social media channels. However, the SEC’s decision has not gone unnoticed by some critics who raised doubts about the settlement.

Ripple’s CLO Stuart Alderoty, known for his legal expertise, took to Twitter to question the enforceability of the SEC’s settlement, suggesting it might be a mere “PR stunt.” He argued that settlements without admissions of guilt are not legally binding. “What matters is that when seriously challenged in court, the SEC continues to lose,” Alderoty added.

David Schwartz, CTO at Ripple, also weighed in, implying that such settlements may not necessarily be a victory for any party involved. Other critics, including James Filan, a former federal prosecutor, and Bill Morgan, a lawyer and digital asset enthusiast, have echoed the same concerns, considering the SEC’s approach as “punishing.”

Several crypto companies, including Kraken, have chosen to settle with the SEC to avoid lengthy legal battles. However, some, such as Ripple and Grayscale, have opted to challenge the SEC in court. Ripple itself achieved a partial victory against the SEC, and the agency also faced defeat in its case against Grayscale.

SC2 initially raised over $8 million by selling NFTs, priced at around $800 each, that offered fans exclusive access to the six-episode animated series. The SEC alleged that the project misled investors into thinking they would profit from selling the NFTs in the secondary market.

These charges against SC2 mark the SEC’s second action against NFTs, potentially bringing all NFTs under their jurisdiction. On August 30, the SEC accused Impact Theory of selling unregulated securities through NFTs, likening them to investment contracts. Impact Theory later settled with the SEC for $6 million without admitting or denying the allegations.

The post Stoner Cats NFTs Face SEC; Critics Question Settlement’s Legitimacy appeared first on Coin Edition.

Read more on Coin Edition

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.