Circle Joins as a “Friend of the Court” in the Binance vs. SEC Case

Published 13/10/2023, 09:52
Circle Joins as a “Friend of the Court” in the Binance vs. SEC Case

Coin Edition -

  • Judge granted Circle an amicus curiae status in Binance vs. SEC legal dispute.
  • Circle can offer its perspective on the case without bias.
  • Permission is required from the court for Circle to participate in oral argument.

Circle, the issuer of the USD Coin stablecoin, has been granted by the court as the amicus curiae in the ongoing legal dispute between the world’s largest exchange, Binance, and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

Just a day before the crucial hearing in the SEC vs. Binance lawsuit, United States District Judge Amy Jackson cleared an amicus brief filed by Circle. This development allows Circle to offer its perspective on the case without displaying bias toward either Binance or its CEO, Changpeng Zhao. However, Circle can only participate in the oral argument with explicit permission from the court.

Circle filed an amicus curiae or friend of the court brief on September 29 in favor of Binance, arguing that stablecoins like BUSD and USDC should not be classified as securities. A portion of their filing stated, “Payment stablecoins, on their own, do not have the essential features of an investment contract.”

The USDC issuer contended that purchasers of the US dollar-pegged tokens do not expect to profit from their investments. They further argued that financial trading regulations should not be extended to stablecoins whose value is tied to other assets.

Dating back to June this year, the SEC charged Binance, Binance.US, and CEO Zhao, for the unregistered offer and sale of securities, such as its native token BNB and its own stablecoin BUSD, among other allegations.

The SEC alleged that Binance marketed BUSD as an investment contract after meeting the conditions of the Howey test, promising investors the opportunity to profit from the BUSD ecosystem. “Since its inception, BUSD has been offered and sold as an investment contract and, therefore, as a security,” the SEC filing stated.

Binance and Zhao subsequently requested that the court dismiss the SEC’s lawsuit against them, contending that the SEC is enforcing laws retroactively and overstepping its authority. Similarly, competitors like Coinbase (NASDAQ:COIN), are arguing that cryptocurrencies should not be subject to the stringent existing financial regulations in the United States

The post Circle Joins as a “Friend of the Court” in the Binance vs. SEC Case appeared first on Coin Edition.

Read more on Coin Edition

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.