Earnings call transcript: Monro Inc. beats Q1 2026 EPS forecasts, stock drops

Monro Inc. (MNRO) reported its first-quarter earnings for fiscal year 2026, revealing a stronger-than-expected performance with earnings per share (EPS) of $0.22, surpassing the forecast of $0.15. Despite this positive earnings surprise of 46.67%, the company’s stock fell by 10.94% following the announcement. According to InvestingPro data, analysts expect the company to remain profitable this year with a forecasted EPS of $0.67, suggesting potential recovery ahead. The revenue also exceeded expectations, coming in at $301 million against a forecast of $295.05 million. However, market sentiment appears to have been influenced by other factors discussed during the earnings call.

Key Takeaways

• EPS of $0.22 beat the forecast of $0.15, a 46.67% surprise.
• Revenue reached $301 million, exceeding expectations by 2.03%.
• Stock price dropped 10.94% post-announcement.
• Comparable store sales increased by 5.7%.
• Gross margin decreased by 170 basis points to 37.5%.

Company Performance

Monro Inc. showed resilience in the first quarter of fiscal 2026, with sales growth of 2.7% year-over-year. The company recorded $301 million in sales, driven by a 5.7% increase in comparable store sales. Despite these gains, Monro reported a net loss of $8.1 million, contrasting with a net income of $5.9 million in the same quarter last year. The decline in gross margin by 170 basis points to 37.5% of sales was a significant factor affecting profitability.

Financial Highlights

• Revenue: $301 million, up 2.7% year-over-year.
• Earnings per share: $0.22, compared to a loss of $0.28 per share last year.
• Gross margin: 37.5%, down 170 basis points.
• Net loss: $8.1 million, compared to a net income of $5.9 million last year.

Earnings vs. Forecast

Monro Inc. exceeded expectations with an EPS of $0.22 against a forecast of $0.15, marking a 46.67% positive surprise. Revenue also surpassed projections, coming in at $301 million compared to the anticipated $295.05 million, a 2.03% beat. This performance indicates a strong quarter relative to analysts’ predictions.

Market Reaction

Despite the earnings beat, Monro’s stock fell by 10.94% in the post-market session, closing at $16.32. This decline suggests investor concerns, possibly related to the broader financial outlook or operational challenges discussed during the earnings call. The stock remains within its 52-week range, which saw a high of $31.49 and a low of $12.2. InvestingPro analysis indicates the stock is currently undervalued, with additional insights available in the comprehensive Pro Research Report, one of 1,400+ detailed company analyses available to subscribers.

Outlook & Guidance

Looking ahead, Monro expects continued growth in comparable store sales year-over-year. However, the company anticipates ongoing pressure on gross margins. It plans to reduce total sales by $45 million through store optimization and expects to spend $25-$35 million in capital expenditures. The company aims for improvement in adjusted diluted EPS as it progresses through the fiscal year.

Executive Commentary

CEO Peter Fitzsimmons expressed optimism, stating, "We are encouraged by the recent positive momentum." CFO Brian highlighted the company’s potential, noting, "We believe this business can continue to expand margins." Fitzsimmons also emphasized the company’s financial strength, asserting, "Our balance sheet and cash flow profile remain strong."

Risks and Challenges

• Gross Margin Pressure: Continued decrease in gross margins could affect profitability.
• Market Trends: Consumer trade-down in the tire market could impact sales.
• Cost Pressures: Wage inflation and material cost increases present ongoing challenges.
• Tariff Uncertainties: Tariff-related costs could further strain financial performance.
• Store Closures: The impact of closing 145 underperforming stores may affect sales.

Q&A

During the earnings call, analysts focused on the company’s strategy to address flat traffic but increasing ticket sizes. Questions also centered on the potential for gross margin recovery and the impact of store closures on future performance. Monro’s management reiterated their focus on marketing tools and the Confidrive process to drive sales growth.

This comprehensive analysis highlights Monro’s robust earnings performance, tempered by market reactions to broader financial and operational challenges.

Full transcript - Monro Muffler Brake Inc (MNRO) Q1 2026:

Conference Call Operator: Good morning, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to Monro Incorporated Earnings Conference Call for the 2026. At this time, all participants are in a listen only mode. Later, we will conduct a question and answer session and instructions will follow at that time. As a reminder, this conference call is being recorded and may be reproduced in a whole or in part without permission from the company. I would now like to introduce Felix Vescler, Vice President of Investor Relations at Monro.

Please go ahead, Felix.

Felix Vescler, Vice President of Investor Relations, Monro: Thank you. Hello, everyone, and thank you for joining us on this morning’s call. Before we get started, please note that as part of this call, we will be referencing a presentation that is available on the Investors section of our website at corporate.monroe.com/investors. If I could draw your attention to the Safe Harbor statement on Slide two, I’d like to remind participants that our presentation includes some forward looking statements about Monro’s future performance. Actual results may differ materially from those suggested by our comments today.

The most significant factors that could affect future results are outlined in Monro’s filings with the SEC and in our earnings release. The company disclaims any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward looking statements whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise except as required by law. Additionally, on today’s call, management’s statements include a discussion of certain non GAAP financial measures, which are intended to supplement and not be substitutes for comparable GAAP measures. Reconciliations of such supplemental information to the comparable GAAP measures will be included as part of today’s presentation and in our earnings release. With that, I’d like to turn the call over to Monro’s President and Chief Executive Officer, Peter Fitzsimmons.

Peter Fitzsimmons, President and Chief Executive Officer, Monro: Thank you, Felix, and thanks to everyone for joining us. Great to be here with you today. This morning, I’d like to update you on the progress we’ve made in the four key areas identified as opportunities for performance improvement during our initial assessment of the business as shown on slide three of our presentation materials. As a reminder, these include closing unprofitable stores, increasing merchandising productivity, includes mitigating tariff risk, driving profitable customer acquisition and activation, and improving our store location based customer experience and selling effectiveness. After that, I’ll briefly touch upon our fiscal first quarter results, which serve as a solid foundation to build upon as we implement our performance improvement plan to enhance Monro’s operations, drive profitability and increase operating income and total shareholder returns.

Let’s start with closing unprofitable stores. During the first quarter, we successfully completed the closing of 145 underperforming stores, which included repositioning our inventory. To summarize quickly, we announced the closings on our May 28 earnings call. All of the stores were dark by the May. We then completed the removal of the vast majority of our inventory and IT equipment from these locations by the June.

As a reminder, the closure of these stores will have limited impact on our total sales, but is expected to deliver meaningful improvement to our profitability. The 145 stores generated approximately 5% of our total sales in fiscal twenty twenty five and we are likely to recapture some of the sales in other Monroe locations near the closed stores. We’ve now started a process to exit the real estate at these locations which includes 40 owned stores. This process is expected to generate positive cash flow and be largely completed over the next twelve months. Importantly, and as discussed previously, this enables us to focus on improving performance in our eleven fifteen continuing locations for the remainder of fiscal twenty twenty six.

Now turning to performance improvement, let’s first address merchandising including mitigating tariff risk. In early June, we were very pleased to announce that Katie Chang joined Monroe as our Senior Vice President of Merchandising and will lead the merchandising team. Katie has significant experience in both the automotive aftermarket and retail, having previously served in senior roles at American Tire Distributors and the home improvement retailer, Lowe’s. With just two months under her belt, Katie’s already making a significant impact. Together with others on the Monroe team, Katie has spent time with all of our largest vendors and tire distributors.

We’ve had constructive discussions during which we have addressed a wide range of priorities for both Monroe and our valued suppliers, including product availability, resetting our assortment, product training in the stores, price, and go forward marketing support. We will continue our dialogue during the remainder of the summer and expect to be well positioned with the right product to meet our customers’ needs in the current fiscal year and beyond. As it relates to tariffs, our team continues to conduct fact based negotiations with top suppliers to mitigate as much of the tariffs, actual and anticipated, as possible. We’ve experienced some materials cost based and tariff related increases. However, the impact on our first quarter was not as significant as originally anticipated.

As it relates to tires, some cost increases to Monro were offset with minimum advertised pricing adjustments to our customers, which mitigated the impact on our gross margin rate. Given continued uncertainty around where tariff increases will shake out, we will closely monitor and manage the impact on us and on our customers. Now let’s turn to driving customer acquisition and activation. As previously discussed during our May earnings call, we’ve identified Monro’s highest value customers. As a reminder, these customers deliver significantly more profit per customer than our lowest tier of customers.

They are repeat customers that visit us over a number of years, and they choose us because we provide both the tires they want and the auto aftermarket services that meet their vehicle needs. During the first quarter, we advanced our targeting efforts through marketing tests that have been conducted at a significant number of store locations. We have deployed a wide range of digital tools to reach our target audience, but we’ve also selectively reinvigorated local media such as radio and direct mail. We are now implementing our refined targeting in a representative sample across several 100 stores in our chain. The full impact of a more systematic approach to traffic generation won’t be felt until later this fiscal year, but when assessing markets where our approach has already been implemented, the early results are encouraging.

The precision with which we are deploying this targeting may also enable us to leverage our learnings in the development of future marketing programs to reach different customers and in different markets. Finally, let’s address things we are doing to improve the customer experience and selling effectiveness in our stores. Many of you have heard us talk a lot about the Confidrive digital courtesy inspection process. It’s a tremendous tool that allows us to improve communications and educational selling to build trust as well as further solidify relationships with our customers. The progress we continue to make with Confidrive can clearly be seen in our first quarter results as evidenced by the sales and unit growth that we drove in our tire category and our high margin service categories including front end shocks, brakes, batteries, and maintenance services.

While we’ve made progress, we have opportunities to be more effective with this tool going forward. Another area in which we are systematically enhancing the customer experience is through better preparation for our customers before they even arrive at our stores. When guests schedule appointments by calling our stores, our call center, or through our online appointment system, we have opportunities to communicate with them in a variety of ways, including phone, text messages, and emails so that we can fully understand and confirm their tire and vehicle service needs prior to their store visit. We believe that consistent use of these tools will lead to a better customer experience. To accelerate the implementation of an enhanced guest experience, we’ve established a task force aimed at piloting potential improvements, including hands on coaching and training in a range of locations across our store network.

Now let me briefly touch upon several key highlights of our fiscal first quarter results which Brian will cover in more specific detail in just a few moments. Turning to Slide four of our presentation materials. The Monro team drove mid single digit comparable store sales growth in the quarter, which has enabled us to report two consecutive quarters of positive comps for the first time in a couple of years. We maintained prudent operating cost control as reflected in lower store direct costs in the quarter. We reduced inventory levels across the system by approximately $10,000,000 primarily as a result of reducing our store count and our profitability on an adjusted diluted earnings per share basis was in line with our prior year first quarter.

Thomas Windler, Analyst, Stephens: Further

Peter Fitzsimmons, President and Chief Executive Officer, Monro: and encouragingly, our preliminary fiscal July comp store sales are up 2%, which would result in our sixth consecutive month of consistent comp store sales growth. To summarize, we’re pleased with the progress we’ve made implementing the four key areas of focus identified during our initial assessment of the business, which we believe will allow us to accelerate the pace of the company’s performance improvement as well as better capitalize on positive industry trends to unlock Monro’s full potential. Our fiscal first quarter results serve as a solid foundation that we believe we can build upon to drive enhanced profitability and increased operating income and total shareholder returns in fiscal twenty twenty six. Before I hand the call over to Brian, I’d like to thank our teammates for their dedication to achieving our business objectives as well as their commitment to our customers. And with that, I’ll now turn it over to Brian who will provide an overview of Monro’s first quarter performance, strong financial position and some additional color regarding the remainder of fiscal twenty twenty six.

Brian, CFO, Monro: Brian? Thank you, Peter, and good morning, everyone. Turning to Slide five. Sales increased 2.7% to $3.00 $1,000,000 in the first quarter. This was primarily driven by a 5.7% increase in comparable store sales, which was partially offset by a reduction in sales due to closed stores.

For reference, comps were up 7% in April, up 6% in May, and we exited the quarter up 4% in June. Tire units were up 3% in the first quarter. We also gained tire market share in our higher margin tiers in the quarter. Gross margin decreased 170 basis points compared to the prior year. This primarily resulted from higher technician labor costs mostly due to wage inflation and higher material costs largely due to mix within tires from a value oriented consumer that traded down more of their tire purchases to our Tier three offerings as well as an increased level of self funded promotions.

These were partially offset by lower occupancy costs as a percentage of sales. Total operating expenses were $113,000,000 or 37.5% of sales as compared to $95,900,000 or 32.7% of sales in the prior year period. Importantly, the increase was principally due to $14,800,000 of store closing costs related to the closure of 145 underperforming stores and $4,700,000 of costs incurred in connection with third party consultants related to our operational improvement plan. Operating loss for the first quarter was $6,100,000 or negative 2% of sales and was negatively impacted by the store closing and third party consulting costs just discussed. This is compared to operating income of $13,200,000 or 4.5 percent of sales in the prior year period.

Adjusted operating income, a non GAAP measure, for the first quarter was $14,000,000 or 4.7% of sales as compared to $14,700,000 or 5% of sales in the prior year period. Net interest expense decreased to $4,800,000 as compared to $5,100,000 in the same period last year. This was principally due to a decrease in weighted average debt. Income tax benefit was $2,700,000 or an effective tax rate of 24.8, which is compared to income tax expense of $2,300,000 or an effective tax rate of 28.5% in the prior year period. The year over year difference in effective tax rate is primarily related to the discrete tax impact related to share based awards and other adjustments, none of which are significant.

Net loss was $8,100,000 as compared to net income of $5,900,000 in the same period last year. Diluted loss per share was $0.28 This is compared to diluted earnings per share of $0.19 for the same period last year. Adjusted diluted earnings per share, a non GAAP measure, was $0.22 This is compared to adjusted diluted earnings per share of $0.22 in the 2025. Please refer to our reconciliation of adjusted operating income, adjusted net income and adjusted diluted EPS in this morning’s earnings press release and on Slides nine, ten and eleven in the appendix to our earnings presentation for further details regarding excluded items in the first quarter of both fiscal years. As highlighted on Slide six, we continue to maintain a strong financial position.

At the end of the first quarter, we had net bank debt of $64,000,000 availability under our credit facility of approximately $398,000,000 and cash and equivalents of approximately $8,000,000 Our AP to inventory ratio was 175% at the end of the first quarter versus 177% at the end of fiscal twenty twenty five. Our cash from operations was slightly negative in the quarter, primarily due to timing of vendor payments. We received $3,000,000 in divestiture proceeds, invested $7,000,000 in capital expenditures, spent $10,000,000 in principal payments for financing leases and distributed $9,000,000 in dividends. Now turning to our expectations for the full year of fiscal twenty twenty six on Slide seven. Given the uncertainty surrounding a fluid tariff situation and macro environment, we are not providing guidance for fiscal twenty twenty six at this time.

However, we are providing the following assumptions to assist in your modeling. We continue to expect to deliver year over year comparable store sales growth in fiscal twenty twenty six, primarily driven by our improvement plan as well as any tariff related price adjustments to our customers. We continue to expect that the results of our store optimization plan will reduce total sales by approximately $45,000,000 in fiscal twenty twenty six. Given expected baseline cost inflation as well as our exposure to tariff related cost increases, we expect that our gross margin for the full year of fiscal twenty twenty six will continue to remain pressured. We continue to expect to partially offset some of this baseline cost inflation as well as some of the tariff related cost increases with benefits from our store closures and operational improvements from our improvement plan.

We believe this will allow us to deliver year over year improvement in our adjusted diluted earnings per share in fiscal twenty twenty six. We continue to expect to generate sufficient operating cash flow that will allow us to maintain a strong financial position and to fund all of our capital allocation priorities including our dividend during fiscal twenty twenty six. Regarding our capital expenditures, we continue to expect to spend $25,000,000 to $35,000,000 And with that, I will now turn the call back over to Peter for some closing remarks.

Peter Fitzsimmons, President and Chief Executive Officer, Monro: Thanks, Brian. As previously indicated, we believe our business model is durable with Monroe able to provide an important service to our customers in any economic environment. Our balance sheet and cash flow profile remain strong. We are encouraged by the recent positive momentum and expect that the three remaining pillars of our plan will improve operations, drive incremental profitability and enhance total shareholder returns this fiscal year. With that, I will now turn it over to the operator for questions.

Brian, CFO, Monro: Hello?

Conference Call Operator: Thank you. We will now begin today’s Q and A session. Again, to ask a question, press star one. As a reminder, if you are using a speakerphone, please remember to pick up your headset before asking a question. We also ask that you limit yourself to one question and one or two follow-up questions.

The first question is from the line of Thomas Windler with Stephens. You may proceed.

Thomas Windler, Analyst, Stephens: Hey, good morning everyone.

Peter Fitzsimmons, President and Chief Executive Officer, Monro: Hi, Tom. Good morning.

Thomas Windler, Analyst, Stephens: Congratulations on the strong quarter. Just wanted to dig into SG and A here. Once you pull out some of the one time items, there’s some really nice improvement year over year. Can you give me a little color on how much that improvement was from closing the unprofitable stores? And then how should we be thinking about kind of SG and A as a percent of revenue moving forward?

Brian, CFO, Monro: Yes. That’s a great question. We had great cost control in the quarter. The team did a good job of managing store direct costs as well as our corporate costs. Some of that benefit was related to the closed stores, but as a reminder, we only had that benefit for one month in June, but we saw better SG and A as a percent of sales in April and May as well prior to the closures.

As we think about the balance of the year, we’re still looking at flattish G and A for the remaining quarters compared to the prior year.

Thomas Windler, Analyst, Stephens: Perfect. Thank you. And then maybe just one more from me. Just touching on the same store sales, 2% in July. How should we be thinking about same store sales for the back half of the year?

Thank you.

Peter Fitzsimmons, President and Chief Executive Officer, Monro: So I think we feel pretty good about six consecutive months of positive comps. And remember in the first or in the last quarter of the prior fiscal year, our comps were up 2.8%. So 2.8% and then 5.7%, we think establishes us in achieving what we proposed, which is to steadily increase our comp store sales year over year. Doesn’t mean it’s going to be consistent, but steadily over the quarters, I think we’re looking at positive comp store sales. So we would suggest people look less at the monthly and more at the trend, which has been pretty positive.

Thomas Windler, Analyst, Stephens: Perfect. Appreciate answering my questions.

David Lynch, Analyst, Wells Fargo: You bet.

Conference Call Operator: You. The next question is from the line of David Lynch with Wells Fargo. You may proceed.

David Lynch, Analyst, Wells Fargo: Hey, good morning guys. I was just curious if you could dive into gross margin a little more details. Obviously declined 170 basis points year over year, but was curious if you could give us more commentary on the trajectory of the year as well as how much higher technician labor costs and material costs were in the quarter and what the D and L leverage looks like?

Brian, CFO, Monro: Absolutely. Thanks for the question. So as you look at the components of the 170 basis point decline in gross margin year over year, and just as a reminder that Q1 gross margin in the prior year is our hardest comp of the year in terms of gross margin percentage. But that decline of 170 basis points was driven by 170 basis points higher technician labor costs as a percent of sales, primarily driven by wage inflation year over year. There was about 120 basis points of material cost, higher as a percentage of sales, really driven by the continued trade down into Tier three in the tire category as well as the effect of higher self funded promotions year over year.

And then finally, we saw 120 basis point benefit of leverage on occupancy costs related to the higher comps, but also we had some benefit of the store closures for one month of the quarter. As it relates to the go forward, I think that we’ll see some of the technician labor cost pressure dissipate as the comps in that category get a little bit easier as the year goes on. Same thing with the material costs. From a year over year perspective, the promotional activity and the trade down will start to lap that. We really didn’t experience that too much in Q1 of last year, but we’ll experience and lap prior year trade down and prior year promotions.

And then obviously, if we continue to deliver increased comparable store sales and see the continued benefit from the store closures, we’d expect to continue to leverage on D and O. So all in, I would say that we expect our gross margin compared to the prior year to narrow and then ultimately to meet as we get to the latter part of the second half.

David Lynch, Analyst, Wells Fargo: Got it. That’s helpful. And then on the Q1 comps, can you just talk about traffic and ticket in a little more detail and also what that looks like on a quarter to date basis?

Peter Fitzsimmons, President and Chief Executive Officer, Monro: Traffic has been pretty steady, but we have seen an increase in ticket, which we’re pretty happy about. And we’re optimistic that some of the things that we’re putting into place to drive incremental traffic will take hold as the year progresses. And with some luck, we’ll continue to see strong ARO.

Bret Jordan, Analyst, Jefferies: Got it. Thank you.

Peter Fitzsimmons, President and Chief Executive Officer, Monro: Thanks.

Conference Call Operator: Thank you. The next question is from the line of Bret Jordan with Jefferies. You may proceed.

Brian, CFO, Monro: Hey, good morning guys.

Peter Fitzsimmons, President and Chief Executive Officer, Monro: Hey, Bret.

Bret Jordan, Analyst, Jefferies: Since traffic was steady, is that up? Was traffic and ticket both up in the quarter?

Peter Fitzsimmons, President and Chief Executive Officer, Monro: Traffic was flat in the quarter. Up some months, flat in others. And ticket was steadily up throughout the quarter.

David Lynch, Analyst, Wells Fargo: Okay. And then I think you called out 120

Bret Jordan, Analyst, Jefferies: basis point benefit from occupancy leverage and closures. What was the net impact of closing the stores in the quarter or two on the margin? I guess you had the benefit of lower SG and A and the benefit lever or lower occupancy. What did that what did the store closures contribute in the quarter?

Brian, CFO, Monro: Yes. Without getting into specifics, I would say that it was a smaller piece of the benefit in those lines in the quarter given the fact that we only had one month of those stores being closed. We expect it to be more meaningful, but it wasn’t the bigger driver of the quarter for Q1.

Peter Fitzsimmons, President and Chief Executive Officer, Monro: Would add that I was just going to say, Brett, I would add that when you look at the impact of a full quarter’s worth of gross margin, the gross margin in the stores that we closed was definitely lower than the continuing stores. So that should help us as we go forward also.

Bret Jordan, Analyst, Jefferies: Okay. And then I guess how should we think about second quarter costs on the closures? And you said 40 properties were owned that you’re going to divest. Were those mortgaged? Or is that a real chunk of cash flow that would come out of that?

Brian, CFO, Monro: Yes. There’s no mortgage there. All of our business is financed strictly through the revolver as well as the finance lease on our books. So we said that we thought that we would be able to generate positive cash flow related to the real estate activities that we have ahead of us, and we expected those to primarily be done over the year. So we expect to be a source of cash from here forward related to the store closures.

Peter Fitzsimmons, President and Chief Executive Officer, Monro: I would add that one of the very good things about the closures is they’re done. We announced at the May that we were going to close the stores. They were closed by the May. We moved all the inventory by the June and there aren’t going to be any incremental costs from store closures going forward. So as we said in our prepared remarks, it enables us to completely focus on those things that can drive improved performance in the continuing stores.

Bret Jordan, Analyst, Jefferies: Great. Thank you. Appreciate it. Thank

Conference Call Operator: you. The next question is from the line of Brian Nagel with Oppenheimer. You may proceed.

Brian Nagel, Analyst, Oppenheimer: Hey, guys. Good morning. Nice quarter.

Peter Fitzsimmons, President and Chief Executive Officer, Monro: Hi, Brian. Good morning to you. Thank you very much.

Brian Nagel, Analyst, Oppenheimer: Question I want to ask, I mean, it’s a bit repetitive, so I apologize. But just so you look at the sales trajectory. So clearly, I mean, when you’re talking about, we’ve now had this nice period of positive comps. But above the deposit, there’s some volatility. Just look at what we went from Q4 to Q1 and then modest moderation here at least early into the fiscal second quarter.

So is there something is there a way to explain that? I mean recognizing your business tends to lead to short term volatility, is there some way to explain kind of why we’re seeing this trajectory in comps?

Peter Fitzsimmons, President and Chief Executive Officer, Monro: Well, I would say that as Brian has commented previously, the comps in the prior year were easier for us to perform well against than they are on a go forward basis. But I think it’s also important to focus on the work streams that we think will drive incremental profit. And they are driving traffic steadily through improving the way we go to market and reach our customers using the digital tools that we put into place. This isn’t something that happens in few weeks, But over the course of the rest of the year, we’re going to see I think some incremental traffic from that. We’re seeing a little bit of it in the last few weeks by focusing on those customers that are repeat customers and do buy more product for us, product and services.

And then the second thing that I think encourages us about increased sales on a go forward basis is the use of the tools that we have in the stores, mainly Confidrive. So what Confidrive enables us to do when we do it well is inspect the vehicle and tell the customer what things the customer, he or she ought to be thinking about in order to keep their car safe. We suggested to you that in the first quarter we saw some really positive signs out of that. For example, we had a 26% increase in front end shocks. That’s all coming from what we learned in the Confidrive process.

So the combination on a go forward basis of the marketing effort and the ability to use Confidrive to drive incremental sales both in the moment when the car is on the rack and over time when we retarget the customer after we learn what they might need, I think will contribute to better sales performance in the latter part of the year.

Brian Nagel, Analyst, Oppenheimer: That’s very, very helpful. And then my follow-up question, just on gross margin. If given it seems like as the business is evolving here, there’s different puts and takes. But how should we think about what we’re sort of, say, playing for in gross margin, near and longer term? And what levels should we be looking at to suggest that Monro is back to a healthy state there?

Brian, CFO, Monro: Well, think that, first of all, the decrease in Q1 is against our toughest compare of the year. We made comments in the outlook saying that we thought gross margin was going to remain pressured for FY 2026. We kind of dimensionalize that as no better than prior year gross margins in FY 2026. And the components of that are some of the things that I talked about in a previous question related to lapping some more like for like compares on the promotional environment, the trade down environment and the labor environment. But also knowing that we have baseline cost inflation and tariff costs building in and we’re very conscious of the impact that could have on us and on our consumer.

So that’s the kind of look for FY 2026. As we think about longer term, we think this business can continue to expand margins on a growing comp sales number and that’s really driven by leverage and occupancy costs as well as being able to use the merchandising programs that we have in place with Katie’s onboarding to find material margins and variable margins as well.

Brian Nagel, Analyst, Oppenheimer: There

Conference Call Operator: are no further questions waiting at this time. I would now like to pass the call back over to our CEO for any closing remarks.

Peter Fitzsimmons, President and Chief Executive Officer, Monro: Well, thank you again to everyone for joining us today. I’m optimistic about the opportunities in front of us and I really do believe that Monroe is well positioned to capitalize on positive industry trends as we focus on driving profitable growth this year. We still have further room for progress as we continue to implement our performance improvement plan and we have a lot of work to do. But we’ve got a good foundation to create long term value for all of our stakeholders. We look forward to keeping you updated on our progress in the quarters to come.

Have a great day. Thanks again.

Conference Call Operator: Thank you. At this time, that will now conclude today’s call. We appreciate your participation. We hope you all have a wonderful day. And at this time, you may now disconnect your line.

This article was generated with the support of AI and reviewed by an editor. For more information see our T&C.