Breaking News
Investing Pro 0
💎 Access the Market Tools Trusted by Thousands of Investors Get Started

How Many More Warnings Do You Need About the Danger in Banks?

By Avi GilburtMarket OverviewMay 09, 2023 09:13
ng.investing.com/analysis/how-many-more-warnings-do-you-need-about-the-danger-in-banks-167844
How Many More Warnings Do You Need About the Danger in Banks?
By Avi Gilburt   |  May 09, 2023 09:13
Saved. See Saved Items.
This article has already been saved in your Saved Items
 

George Santayana once wisely noted that "those who do not remember the past are condemned to repeat it."

Throughout market history, market historians had many instances from which lessons in hubris should have been learned. Yet, most do not learn the lessons history has to offer.

We will not have any more crashes in our time.

This was said by John Maynard Keynes in 1927, two years before the stock market crash, which led to the Great Depression.

Stock prices have reached what looks like a permanently high plateau. I do not feel there will be soon if ever a 50- or 60-point break from present levels, such as they have predicted. I expect to see the stock market a good deal higher within a few months.

This was said on October 17, 1929, a few weeks before the Great Crash, by Dr. Irving Fisher, Professor of Economics at Yale University. Dr. Fisher was one of the leading US economists of his time.

I cannot help but raise a dissenting voice to statements that we are living in a fool's paradise, and that prosperity in this country must necessarily diminish and recede in the near future.

This was said on January 12, 1928 (a little more than a year and a half before the 1929 stock market crash) by E. H. H. Simmons, the President of the New York Stock Exchange.

There will be no interruption of our permanent prosperity.

This was also said a little over a year and a half before the 1929 stock market crash by Myron E. Forbes, the President of the Pierce Arrow Motor Car Co.

And these are just a few of the popular quotes of their day.

By the way, have you ever heard of the Pierce Arrow Motor Car Company? You have not? Well, that is because they went bankrupt during the Great Depression. But I digress.

So, do you think our public officials have learned the lessons of history?

In 2017, Janet Yellen, who served as the Federal Reserve Chair at the time, said that the banking system is "much stronger" due to Fed supervision and higher capital levels. She followed that up with what I believe will be a history-making statement. Yellen predicted that because of the Fed's measures, another financial crisis is unlikely "in our lifetime."

I also want to remind you that this is the same Janet Yellen who said on December 11, 2007 (right before the market began to meltdown):

I don't foresee conditions in the banking sector getting as bleak as during the credit crunch of the early 1990s...

Well, in some ways, she was right. The conditions in 2008 were much worse.

Back in 2017, right after Ms. Yellen made her more recent proclamation about the "new and improved" banking system, I penned an article noting the following:

In 10 years from now, we will likely be adding Janet Yellen to the list of those who lacked the foresight to see what history should have taught them... I am sorry to tell you this Ms. Yellen, but history's lesson will be learned the hard way by those who have failed to already learn from the past, as Mr. Santayana has warned. This time is not different.

What is also quite interesting is what Alan Greenspan was once quoted as saying regarding the Federal Reserve's ability to prognosticate the future:

We really can't forecast all that well, and yet we pretend that we can, but we really can't.

Maybe we can understand the context within which we should view Jerome Powell's statement yesterday that "the banking system is sound and resilient."

But, you see, Mr. Powell has no choice but to make statements like this whether he believes them true. Our government officials are now playing this game of chicken with us regarding the banking system. They know quite well that when the public loses faith in the banking system, they lose the game of chicken. Therefore, they have no choice but to publicly proclaim the strength of the system, despite their beliefs to the contrary.

And, to be honest with you, if they have reviewed the banks' balance sheets, as have we, then there is no way they can be honest in their assessment that "the banking system is sound and resilient." The underlying balance sheets suggest otherwise.

And, if you have money in the US banking industry, then you are simply a pawn in this game of chicken being played by our policymakers, and it is time for you to act. It is time for you to do a deep dive into the banks that house your hard-earned money to determine whether your bank is truly solid.

We're speaking of protecting your hard-earned money. Therefore, it behooves you to engage in due diligence regarding the banks which currently house your money. You have a responsibility to yourself and your family to make sure your money resides in only the safest of institutions. And, if you are relying on the FDIC, I suggest you read our prior articles, which outline why such reliance will not be as prudent as you may believe in the coming years.

How Many More Warnings Do You Need About the Danger in Banks?
 

Related Articles

How Many More Warnings Do You Need About the Danger in Banks?

Add a Comment

Comment Guidelines

We encourage you to use comments to engage with users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind: 

  • Enrich the conversation
  • Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed.
  • Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically.
  •  Use standard writing style. Include punctuation and upper and lower cases.
  • NOTE: Spam and/or promotional messages and links within a comment will be removed
  • Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user.
  • Don’t Monopolize the Conversation. We appreciate passion and conviction, but we also believe strongly in giving everyone a chance to air their thoughts. Therefore, in addition to civil interaction, we expect commenters to offer their opinions succinctly and thoughtfully, but not so repeatedly that others are annoyed or offended. If we receive complaints about individuals who take over a thread or forum, we reserve the right to ban them from the site, without recourse.
  • Only English comments will be allowed.

Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.

Write your thoughts here
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
Post also to:
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Thanks for your comment. Please note that all comments are pending until approved by our moderators. It may therefore take some time before it appears on our website.
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Add Chart to Comment
Confirm Block

Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?

By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's Investing.com's posts.

%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List

Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.

Report this comment

I feel that this comment is:

Comment flagged

Thank You!

Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Continue with Google
or
Sign up with Email