Tariffs, Rare Earths, and the Search for an Off-Ramp

Published 14/10/2025, 07:38
Updated 14/10/2025, 07:40

Markets are trying to price two opposite paths at once: a US–China escalation that turns trade tools into weapons, and a negotiated glide path that removes tail risk without restoring trust. The result is a kind of cross-asset hesitation—oil stabilizing near recent lows, yields hovering close to 4%, copper staying resilient, and the yuan steady—all hinting at cautious optimism that diplomacy will prevail.

The Real Meaning Behind the Signals

Policy signals matter more than public statements. In Washington, Treasury officials are leaving the door open for de-escalatory talks while making it clear that countermeasures remain an option. In Beijing, the Commerce Ministry’s language about implementing export controls in a “prudential and moderate” way is a face-saving maneuver that preserves flexibility ahead of any leader-level meeting. The muted coverage of Trump’s 100% tariff threat in Chinese state media is another sign that Beijing wants to avoid inflaming nationalist sentiment.

Both sides are essentially buying time to test the other’s limits. Washington will likely demand that China rescind, not simply delay, its rare-earth export controls, while Beijing will seek a tradeoff—restraint on tariffs in exchange for a softer export regime. Misreading intentions could easily trigger another cycle of retaliation.

How Markets Are Reading It

Energy: Oil has bounced modestly, with Brent near $64 and WTI around $60. The rebound suggests markets see a chance for progress but remain wary of slowing demand. Futures positioning shows traders leaning toward short-term stability rather than renewed optimism.

Bonds: The 10-year Treasury yield is holding just above 4%, reflecting an uneasy balance between solid growth data and lingering policy risk. If negotiations advance, the term premium could compress toward 3.8%. Escalation, on the other hand, would likely spark a flight-to-safety rally that pulls yields lower for the wrong reasons.

FX: Dollar–yuan stability around 7.13 indicates that the PBOC is managing expectations carefully. A credible easing of trade tensions could strengthen the yuan, but a re-escalation involving broader tariffs or stricter export controls would weaken it and spill over to Asian currencies.

Commodities: Copper near $5 per pound signals that investors still believe global demand will hold, supported by electrification and data center expansion. Rare-earth equities, tracked by the VanEck REMX ETF (NYSE:REMX), are trading near their 12-month highs—pricing in both structural supply tightness and policy uncertainty. If China moves from “prudential” to “prohibitive,” this segment could see sharp gains but also volatility.

Why a De-escalation Makes Sense but Remains Fragile

Neither side benefits from renewed tariff escalation. Oil prices in the low 60s already show sensitivity to demand risks, and further disruption would undermine business investment in both economies. Supply chains have diversified since the last trade war, meaning new tariffs could hit U.S. allies and complicate Washington’s broader strategic goals.

Yet rare-earths occupy a unique space where industrial policy and national security overlap. The U.S. may push too hard for a full rollback of export curbs, while China may only offer cosmetic adjustments. Domestic politics on both sides could make compromise difficult—once a “100% tariff” is mentioned publicly, it becomes a symbol that leaders are reluctant to drop without concessions.

Investor Outlook

Equities: A clear de-escalation would support cyclical stocks, semiconductors with large Asia exposure, and emerging-market value names. If talks stall, investors may favor a barbell strategy—quality growth paired with tangible-asset sectors such as energy and infrastructure.

Rates and FX: A constructive tone could lower long yields toward the high-3% range and soften the dollar against Asian peers. Escalation would likely push investors into Treasurys and strengthen the dollar, especially versus the yuan and other EM currencies.

Commodities: Oil’s recent rebound needs confirmation from demand data. Copper remains the best sentiment gauge: a sustained break below $4.80 would suggest that markets are losing faith in negotiation progress.

The Bottom Line

This standoff is not just about tariffs—it’s about who defines the rules of strategic materials trade in the coming decade. Markets currently expect a limited deal that avoids “100%” outcomes but leaves both sides with leverage intact. That baseline implies steady yields near 4%, a stable dollar–yuan pair, and copper that continues to defy pessimism.

The bear case—a failed off-ramp that entrenches export controls and revives tariff threats—would trigger dollar strength, a bond rally, and pressure on Asian equities. The bull case—mutual restraint and verifiable moderation—would lift risk assets, narrow credit spreads, and re-anchor inflation expectations.

Investors should focus less on the headlines and more on the signals: China’s licensing guidance, the tone of U.S. Treasury statements, and how copper behaves on down days. When those indicators align, the market will know which path has truly been chosen.

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers
© 2007-2025 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.