Gold bars to be exempt from tariffs, White House clarifies
On Monday, BofA Securities revised its stance on Bank of Nova Scotia (NYSE:BNS:CN) (NYSE: BNS), downgrading the stock’s rating from Buy to Neutral and reducing the price target to Cdn$70.00 from the previous Cdn$82.00. The adjustment was prompted by significant changes in the bank’s operational outlook, which has been affected by increasing trade tensions. According to InvestingPro data, seven analysts have recently revised their earnings expectations downward for the upcoming period, suggesting broader market concerns about the bank’s near-term prospects.
Ebrahim Poonawala, an analyst at BofA Securities, pointed out that while no bank is expected to remain unaffected by a slowing GDP growth or a potential recession, Scotiabank (TSX:BNS)’s performance might be particularly constrained due to specific risks. These include the bank’s exposure to Latin America and Mexico, which contribute 28% and 13% to its earnings, respectively. This concern is amplified by the recent BofA Economics team’s forecast, which downgraded Mexico’s GDP growth to zero percent. Despite these challenges, InvestingPro data shows the bank maintains a significant market presence with a $59.46B market capitalization and has demonstrated resilience through its 53-year track record of consecutive dividend payments.
Additionally, Scotiabank’s Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1) capital ratio stands at 12.9%, which is below the 13.5% median of its peers, potentially limiting its ability to weather a deteriorating macroeconomic environment. The bank also faces execution risks related to management’s ongoing turnaround efforts. Current InvestingPro metrics indicate a FAIR Financial Health score of 2.17, with the bank maintaining a robust dividend yield of 4.32% despite these challenges. For deeper insights into BNS’s financial health and comprehensive analysis, investors can access the detailed Pro Research Report, available exclusively to InvestingPro subscribers.
The revised price target of Cdn$70.00 is based on updated multiples, including a price-to-book ratio (P/Book) of 1.2x with a 50% weight and a forward price-to-earnings ratio (FY25e P/E) of 10x with a 50% weight, which were previously set at 1.3x and 12x, respectively. These adjustments reflect the analyst’s recalibration of the bank’s valuation in light of the outlined challenges. Based on InvestingPro’s Fair Value analysis, the stock currently appears to be trading near its fair value, with a P/E ratio of 13.5x and a price-to-book ratio of 1.0x.
In other recent news, Scotiabank reported strong first-quarter financial results for 2025, exceeding analyst expectations. The bank’s diluted earnings per share (EPS) reached $1.76, surpassing the forecasted $1.67, and revenue increased by 11% year-over-year to $9.37 billion, above the anticipated $8.81 billion. Scotiabank also demonstrated an improved return on equity of 11.8%, up from 10.6% the previous year. Additionally, the bank’s non-interest income saw a 15% rise to $4.2 billion, contributing significantly to the earnings beat.
In another development, Scotiabank has filed its Modern Slavery Report with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. The report is part of the bank’s commitment to addressing modern slavery and human trafficking in its operations and supply chains, reflecting its broader corporate social responsibility initiatives.
Furthermore, Scotiabank announced the sale of its banking operations in Colombia, Costa Rica, and Panama, which is expected to be capital neutral and beneficial to earnings. The bank’s strategic capital deployment includes an investment in KeyCorp (NYSE:KEY), aimed at boosting earnings growth and return on equity metrics.
Lastly, analysts have noted Scotiabank’s strong performance, particularly in its Global Banking and Markets segment, which saw a 33% year-over-year earnings increase. The bank’s strategic focus on capital allocation and client growth continues to drive its financial performance amidst ongoing macroeconomic and geopolitical uncertainties.
This article was generated with the support of AI and reviewed by an editor. For more information see our T&C.