Get 40% Off
🤯 Perficient is up a mind-blowing 53%. Our ProPicks AI saw the buying opportunity in March.Read full update

Bill Morgan: The SEC Stretching the Howey Test in Case Vs Ripple

Published 05/05/2023, 12:13
Updated 05/05/2023, 12:15
Bill Morgan: The SEC Stretching the Howey Test in Case Vs Ripple

  • Bill Morgan believes the SEC is trying to stretch the Howey Test in its case against Ripple.
  • Morgan asked people to dispel any doubt on the SEC’s plot even if Judge Torres sidesteps ruling on secondary market spells.
  • Morgan based his stance on John E. Deaton’s submission to Judge Analisa Torres.

According to digital assets enthusiast Bill Morgan, there is no doubt the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is trying to stretch the Howey Test in its case against Ripple. Morgan made the statement while acknowledging a submission by John E. Deaton, the Managing Partner of the Deaton Law Firm, to Judge Analisa Torres of the US District Court of the Southern District of New York.

Morgan emphasized that even if Judge Torres sidesteps ruling on secondary market spells, people should dispel any doubt on the SEC’s plot. He noted that in the SEC v Bittrex matter, the allegations against Bittrex rested on the characterization of the digital assets involved as being securities, even when sold in the secondary market.

Morgan based his stance on Deaton’s submission to Judge Torres, where he noted the SEC’s theory on the case is farfetched. Deaton observed the SEC had asked the court to validate its contention to classify all existing XRP tokens as securities. That includes XRP tokens sold in the secondary market.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

According to Deaton, the SEC’s Howey argument’s scope has become so stretched that it is indefinable in space or time. He noted the SEC is asking the court to assume private statements made by Ripple employees to a handful of individuals, evidence that Ripple offered XRP to the world.

Deaton faulted the SEC’s approach and application of the Howey test. He described it as a shortcut, noting that the regulator assumes every sale of XRP meets all three Howey prongs, making it unnecessary to offer specific transactional evidence.

Deaton thinks the Howey test must apply to each transaction, and examined as of the time the transaction took place. According to him, the SEC’s theory would be amusing if it did not harm innocent holders.

The post Bill Morgan: The SEC Stretching the Howey Test in Case Vs Ripple appeared first on Coin Edition.

Read more on Coin Edition

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.