Coinbase Alleges SEC and FDIC Stonewalling on Ethereum Stance in FOIA Lawsuit

Published 28/06/2024, 10:05
Coinbase Alleges SEC and FDIC Stonewalling on Ethereum Stance in FOIA Lawsuit
ETH/USD
-
ETH/USD
-
COIN
-

Coin Edition -

  • Coinbase (NASDAQ:COIN) has filed a lawsuit against SEC and FDIC for not complying with FOIA.
  • The lawsuit claims aggressive regulatory actions hindered the crypto industry’s banking access.
  • Coinbase seeks information on the SEC’s stance on Ethereum and its regulatory authority.

Coinbase has sued the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), accusing the agencies of stonewalling public records requests and stifling the crypto industry through aggressive regulatory practices.

The filing, submitted to the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, requests a court order compelling the release of the requested information. The lawsuit further claims that both agencies have used aggressive regulatory measures to impede the crypto industry’s access to the banking sector. Coinbase also asserts that various federal financial regulators, including the FDIC, SEC, and the Federal Reserve Board, have stifled the digital asset industry over the past two years through stringent regulations.

The lawsuit, filed by consulting firm History Associates Inc. on behalf of Coinbase, seeks to investigate the FDIC’s involvement in potentially questionable regulatory activities. Coinbase’s FOIA requests to the SEC sought details regarding the agency’s stance on Ethereum (ETH) amid a recent lawsuit by blockchain software firm ConsenSys against the SEC.

Last year, Gurbir Grewal, the SEC’s Director of the Division of Enforcement, investigated “Ethereum 2.0,” allegedly targeting Ethereum traders. Although the agency later closed the investigation, Coinbase is seeking clarity on the SEC’s authority in this area. History Associates requested records related to Ethereum’s shift to a proof-of-stake consensus mechanism. However, the SEC denied this request and the subsequent appeal.

Coinbase Chief Legal Officer Paul Grewal criticized the SEC and FDIC, demanding improved transparency in financial regulations. Grewal stated:

“We asked the SEC for documents about closed investigations to shed light on how the SEC views its newfound, sweeping (and unlawful) authority. One of those investigations, which only recently closed, focused on ETH, which the SEC publicly announced is not a security in 2018. And the other investigations have been closed for years. But the SEC stonewalled our requests,”

Grewal also mentioned that the FDIC has rejected requests to provide letters instructing financial institutions to “pause” crypto-related activities.

Coinbase’s legal action against the SEC and FDIC signals a growing rift over the regulation of digital assets. The outcome of this lawsuit could significantly impact how investors are protected in the rapidly evolving crypto market.

The post Coinbase Alleges SEC and FDIC Stonewalling on Ethereum Stance in FOIA Lawsuit appeared first on Coin Edition.

Read more on Coin Edition

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.