🐂 Not all bull runs are created equal. November’s AI picks include 5 stocks up +20% eachUnlock Stocks

Ripple vs. SEC: Key Developments from the Past Week

Published 11/09/2023, 19:22
Updated 11/09/2023, 19:45
Ripple vs. SEC: Key Developments from the Past Week
XRP/USD
-

  • A crypto analyst suggested that the SEC’s appeal could impact the price of XRP.
  • The SEC’s argument about Judge Torres’ decision is “laughable,” said James Filan, a defense lawyer.
  • Ripple is allegedly deliberately attempting to extend the legal case to maintain the sale of XRP.

The legal case between the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and Ripple started in December 2020, when the SEC alleged that Ripple sold XRP in an unregistered security offering to investors. Since then, there have been many rulings, appeals, and opinions on the case, as many believe if Ripple wins, it could advance the crypto industry.

Here are the latest highlights and developments from the case and what has happened in the previous week:

September 11

Crypto analyst Jungle Inc. 2.0 shared on X that the SEC’s appeal in their case against Ripple could impact the price of the token. In a tweet shared on September 11, the analyst stated that XRP’s price could drop by 30-40% in a bearish scenario.

If events changed, according to the analyst’s bullish scenario, XRP could continue to trade above $0.40.

September 8

On September 8, the SEC filed a response brief to support its motion to certify an interlocutory appeal, which represents a memorandum to seek an appellate review.

This filing came after the SEC shared its plan to appeal Judge Analisa Torres’ decision that caused “knotty legal problems,” as mentioned in the filing. Judge Torres ruled that XRP direct sales to institutional buyers were considered a security offering, but programmatic sales and other distributions weren’t.

Prominent defense lawyer James Filan took to X and shared, “The SEC’s argument that Judge Torres should stay the proceedings because the SEC is all of a sudden concerned about conserving judicial resources is laughable.”

In the filing, the SEC alleged that Ripple lacked institutional interest in resolving the lawsuit and was deliberately attempting to extend the legal case to maintain the sale of XRP in the public space.

September 3

On September 3, crypto lawyer John Deaton accused the SEC of stunting XRP’s growth and adoption in the U.S. Deaton showed a “small yet significant” example of how the lawsuit hurt XRP’s adoption.

Deaton shared that even though crypto payments have seen an increase in adoption, XRP isn’t accepted in the U.S. BitPay, a crypto payment platform used by Amazon, initially processed XRP payments in the U.S., but the platform stopped because of the SEC’s lawsuit against Ripple.

Furthermore, Deaton added that XRP used to be one of the first cryptos on the platform. He added that XRP was made for payments, but because of the SEC, the payment token isn’t allowed.

The post Ripple vs. SEC: Key Developments from the Past Week appeared first on Coin Edition.

Read more on Coin Edition

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.