Ripple’s CLO Calls Out Inconsistencies in SEC “Guidance” on Crypto

Published 04/04/2024, 12:46
Updated 04/04/2024, 13:15
Ripple’s CLO Calls Out Inconsistencies in SEC “Guidance” on Crypto
XRP/USD
-

Coin Edition -

  • SEC’s Director Gurbir Grewal claimed the SEC acts with integrity in crypto regulation.
  • Ripple’s CLO highlighted the irony of the claim with instances when courts have rebuked the SEC for failing to act in good faith.
  • One such incident occurred when the SEC was sanctioned for gross abuse of power in its lawsuit against DEBT Box.

Ripple’s Chief Legal Officer Stuart Alderoty has reacted to claims by U.S. SEC Director Gurbir Grewal regarding the crypto industry’s purported noncompliance. On Wednesday, Grewal denounced the crypto industry during a segment of the “SEC Speaks” event sponsored by the Practicing Law Institute.

He addressed the agency’s longstanding criticism, including claims that the SEC engages in regulation through enforcement. Grewal criticized the crypto industry’s alleged noncompliance as creative attempts to avoid “clear” rules.

In reaction, Ripple’s CLO Stuart Alderoty criticized the SEC’s director for claiming that the regulatory agency acts with integrity. Alderoty highlighted the irony of the claims by referencing several legal events where federal courts have rebuked the SEC for failing to act in good faith.

One such incident occurred when the SEC was sanctioned for gross abuse of power in its lawsuit against DEBT Box.

Furthermore, Alderoty cited an instance when a district judge admonished the agency for lacking faithful allegiance to the law in the Ripple lawsuit. Additionally, he recounted when the court declared that the SEC acted arbitrarily and capriciously in the lawsuit against Grayscale Investments.

Moreover, Alderoty criticized Grewal for selectively citing only a portion of the Ripple ruling, where the SEC won, while disregarding the court’s ruling in favor of XRP.

In response to Grewal’s claim that the SEC has offered guidance to the crypto industry, Alderoty commented that the purported guidance inconsistently “adds and subtracts” factors within the Howey test. He emphasized that the inconsistencies resulted in what the agency’s former General Counsel described as “greater confusion.”

Ultimately, the Ripple lawyer advised that if the Agency aims to rectify the institutional damage inflicted on itself and the industry over the past years, it must step down from its pedestal and acknowledge these truths.

The post Ripple’s CLO Calls Out Inconsistencies in SEC “Guidance” on Crypto appeared first on Coin Edition.

Read more on Coin Edition

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.