Fubotv earnings beat by $0.10, revenue topped estimates
Adentra Inc. reported robust financial results for the second quarter of 2025, with a significant year-over-year increase in net income and sales. The company’s stock price leaped 9.56% following the announcement, closing at $29.54. According to InvestingPro analysis, Adentra appears undervalued at current levels, with a "Fair" overall financial health score. This surge in stock price reflects investor confidence in Adentra’s strategic acquisitions and financial discipline, despite challenges in the residential construction market.
[Get access to 6 more exclusive InvestingPro Tips and comprehensive financial analysis for Adentra and 1,400+ other stocks through InvestingPro]
Key Takeaways
- Adentra’s stock rose 9.56% post-earnings announcement.
- Net income grew nearly 30% year-over-year.
- Sales were bolstered by the Wolfe Distributing acquisition.
- Operating cash flow improved significantly from the previous year.
- The company remains cautious about near-term market conditions.
Company Performance
Adentra’s second-quarter performance was marked by a solid increase in total sales, reaching $597.1 million, an 8.7% rise from the same period last year. This growth was primarily driven by the acquisition of Wolfe Distributing, which enhanced Adentra’s presence in the Midwest. Despite flat organic sales, the company achieved a 2.3% increase in pricing, which helped offset volume declines. In the U.S., sales grew by 9.3% to $551.6 million, while Canadian sales increased by 2.8%.
Financial Highlights
- Revenue: $597.1 million, up 8.7% year-over-year.
- Earnings per share: $0.89, up nearly 30% year-over-year.
- Adjusted EBITDA: $54.3 million, a 12% increase year-over-year.
- Gross margin: 21.8%, slightly improved from last year.
- Operating cash flow: $33.9 million, up from $23.8 million in Q2 2024.
Market Reaction
Adentra’s stock price experienced a notable increase of 9.56% following the earnings announcement. The stock closed at $29.54, with analysts maintaining a bullish stance and a consensus target suggesting 24% upside potential. The company’s beta of 1.24 indicates moderate market sensitivity, while its price-to-book ratio of 0.83 suggests attractive valuation. This positive market reaction reflects investor optimism about the company’s strategic direction and financial resilience, despite broader economic uncertainties affecting the residential construction sector.
[Access comprehensive Pro Research Reports and real-time analysis through InvestingPro]
Outlook & Guidance
Looking ahead, Adentra remains cautious about the near-term market environment, particularly due to softness in residential construction and macroeconomic uncertainties. Despite these challenges, the company is confident in the long-term fundamentals of the residential construction market. Adentra aims to maintain EBITDA margins between 8% and 10% and continues to focus on platform efficiency and disciplined mergers and acquisitions.
Executive Commentary
CEO Rob Brown highlighted the company’s strong performance, stating, "We delivered strong results in the second quarter demonstrating the resilience of Adentra’s business model." He reiterated the company’s aim to achieve "double-digit returns and accretive growth." CFO Fez Kormoli emphasized the company’s proactive approach to managing external challenges, noting, "We’ll continue to look for communication out of customs and border patrols."
Risks and Challenges
- The residential construction market remains soft, impacting sales volumes.
- High mortgage rates continue to constrain buyer activity in the U.S. housing market.
- Macro uncertainty and trade dynamics pose potential risks to business operations.
- Affordability challenges in the housing market could affect future growth.
- The company must navigate ongoing trade challenges with a flexible sourcing network.
Q&A
During the earnings call, analysts inquired about inventory levels and cash flow generation. The management expressed confidence in reducing inventory in the year’s second half and highlighted their price pass-through model to manage tariff impacts. Analysts also questioned the impact of recent industry consolidation, to which the management responded that no significant effects were anticipated.
Full transcript - ADENTRA Inc (ADEN) Q2 2025:
Josh, Conference Operator: Good morning. My name is Josh, and I will be your conference operator today. I would like to welcome everyone to the Odentura Second Quarter twenty twenty five Results Conference Call. All lines have been placed on mute to prevent any background noise. After the speakers’ remarks, there will be a question and answer session.
To ask a question during this time, simply press star then the number one on your telephone keypad. To withdraw your question, please press the star button followed by the number two. With me on the call are Rob Brown, Adentra’s President and CEO and Fez Kormoli, Vice President and CFO. Adentra’s q two twenty twenty five earnings release, financial statements, MD and A, and other quarterly filings are available on the Investors section of our website at www.adentragroup.com. These statements have also been filed on the debtor’s profile on Cedar Plus at www.cedar+.ca.
I want to remind listeners that management’s comments during this call may include forward looking statements. These statements involve various known and unknown risks and uncertainties that are based on management’s current expectations and beliefs, which may prove to be incorrect. Actual results could differ materially from these described in these forward looking statements. Please refer to the text in Adenture’s earnings press release and financial filings for a discussion of the risks and uncertainties associated with these forward looking statements. All dollar figures referred today are in U.
S. Dollars unless stated otherwise. I would now like to turn the call over to Rob Brown. Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining us today. We delivered strong results in the second quarter demonstrating the resilience of Adenture’s business model in what continues to be a challenging environment.
Residential construction remains soft and macro uncertainty, particularly around The U. S. Trade landscape continues to weigh on sentiment. Despite that backdrop, we delivered sales of $597,000,000 adjusted EBITDA of $54,000,000 and adjusted EPS of $0.88 Sales were up nearly 9% compared to last year, with the increase driven by the contribution from Wolfe Distributing, which we acquired last summer. On an organic basis, sales held steady.
Modest volume declines were offset by pricing gains. It’s encouraging to see product pricing gradually recover after a prolonged period of deflation in 2023 and early twenty twenty four. Given our price pass through model, higher prices generally translate into stronger revenue and gross profit, notwithstanding changes in market demand. We also saw improvement in gross margin both year over year and sequentially, reflecting effective pricing and procurement execution. And on the cost side, we continued to manage the business with discipline.
Organic operating expenses were up less than 1%, which is well below inflation. Cash flow from operations was solid at 33,900,000.0, and we returned 11,200,000.0 to shareholders during the quarter through dividends and share repurchases. Since March, we’ve repurchased more than 680,000 shares, representing roughly 3% of shares outstanding at an average price of Canadian $28 per share. Our leverage ratio ended the quarter at three point zero times, up from 2.4 times at the start of the year. That reflects the typical inventory build we see in the first half of the year as we prepare for the seasonally stronger summer and fall construction season.
We expect inventory to come down in the second half, which when combined with cash flows from operations should bring leverage back into the mid twos range by year end and position us well for 2026. On the m and a front, we’ve completed seven acquisitions over the past five years, representing over 1,200,000,000.0 in pro form a revenue. These transactions have expanded our reach, diversified our product offering, and increased our exposure to higher margin categories. Wolf, which we acquired at the July, has enhanced our presence in The U. S.
Midwest, introduced new specialty products and strengthened our position with co dealer customers. Turning to trade, approximately 14% of our product mix is now subject to country specific tariffs at an average duty rate of 16%. The US section two three two investigation into wood products remains ongoing, and depending on the outcome, an additional 20% of our product mix could ultimately be affected. That said, we’ve shown we can navigate this environment. Our price pass through model allows us to preserve margins and our sourcing network, which spans over 30 countries, gives us the flexibility to shift supply as we need to.
We also benefit from strong domestic vendor relationships, which helps when customers prefer US sourced products. Finally, we had a positive outcome on the outstanding CVD and AD trade matter in the second quarter, resulting in a 9,700,000.0 net recovery in operating expenses and an expected refund of 23,900,000.0 in previously paid duties. While new CBD and AD investigations are underway, this relates to a smaller portion of our supply chain, and we do not expect a material financial impact from it. With that, I’ll turn the call over to Fez to take you through the financials in more detail. Fez?
Thanks, Rob, and good morning, everyone. Let me walk you through our financial performance for the second quarter. And just a quick reminder, we report in U. S. Dollars.
Total sales came in at $597,100,000 up 8.7% from the same period last year. That growth was largely driven by the contribution from Wolfe Distributing, which we acquired at the July 2024. On the organic side, sales were flat. Pricing was up 2.3%, but that was offset by slightly lower volumes. Looking at the regional performance.
In The U. S, sales grew 9.3%, reaching $551,600,000 That includes a $48,600,000 contribution from Wolf. Organically, we saw price gains of 1.9%, which were offset by a 2.2% decline in volumes. In Canada, sales were Canadian sixty three point one million up 2.8% with pricing up 3.6% and volumes down slightly. Gross profit was 130,100,000.0, an increase of 9.1, and gross margin came in at 21.8%, up slightly from last year.
That reflects both the benefit of higher pricing and strong execution on the procurement side. We also saw a 3.9% reduction in operating expenses, which came in at 88,600,000 That includes a $9,700,000 recovery of trade duties, which helped to offset the $5,500,000 in expenses related to Wolf and a small $600,000 increase in organic operating costs. Adjusted EBITDA grew to 54,300,000 up 12% from Q2 of last year. That improvement was driven by a stronger gross profit and continued cost discipline across the business. Net income for the quarter was 22,100,000.0 or $0.89 per share, up nearly 30% year over year.
On an adjusted basis, net income was $21,900,000 or $0.88 per share compared to $1.03 last year. The year over year decline on adjust on an adjusted basis was due to higher interest and tax expense. Operating cash flow was $33,900,000 compared to $23,800,000 in Q2 of last year. That increase was driven by higher EBITDA and lower tax payments, partially offset by a $7,500,000 investment in working capital. This investment is typical for this time of year as we build inventory ahead of the summer and fall construction season.
We expect working capital to decline in the second half as inventory is sold through and converted to cash. We ended the quarter with net debt to EBITDA of 3x, and we expect that number to come down closer to mid-2s by year end as inventory days improve. We continue to have ample flexibility under our $600,000,000 revolving credit facility, which we extended to 2,030 earlier this year. Lastly, we remain disciplined in how we deploy capital. On August 6, the board approved a 15¢ quarterly dividend.
And during q two, we returned 11,200,000.0 to shareholders through dividends and share buybacks. Since March, we repurchased more than 680,000 shares, representing roughly 3% of shares outstanding at an average price of Canadian $28 per share, which we believe is meaningfully accretive for our shareholders. With that, I’ll turn things back to Rob to discuss our outlook. Rob? Thanks, Saz.
While we’re pleased with our second quarter results, we’re approaching near term with a degree of caution. Affordability remains a challenge in The US housing market with persistently high mortgage rates and constrained inventory weighing on buyer activity. Trade related uncertainty also continues to escalate, increasing the risk of renewed inflationary pressure. Reflecting these dynamics, our average daily sales in July are tracking modestly below q two levels, down about 4%. That said, we remain confident in the long term fundamentals of the residential construction market.
Structural undersupply, strong demographic demand, and an aging housing stock all point to continued underlying growth over time. As always, our focus is on disciplined execution. We’re continuing to operate with rigor, growing on our expertise, navigating through different points in the cycle. Our broad product offering, national footprint, and strong supplier relationships provide the flexibility we need to adapt and the foundation to perform. Looking ahead, we’ll continue to advance our strategic priorities under our full cycle value creation framework.
Our goal remains the same, to deliver double digit returns and accretive growth by driving platform efficiency, pursuing organic initiatives, and executing targeted disciplined M and A in our large and fragmented market. With that, I’ll turn the call back to the operator for questions. Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, we will now begin the question and answer session. If you have a question, please press the star button followed by the number one on your touch tone phone.
You will hear a prompt that your hand has been raised. Should you wish to decline from the polling process, please press the star button followed by the number two. If you are using a speakerphone, please lift the handset before pressing any key. One moment for your first question. First question is from Kyle McPhee of Cormark Securities.
Please go ahead. Hello, everyone. First question, your commentary continues to suggest you’ll pull capital out of inventory through the back half of the year. I’m just curious about the risk that maybe this doesn’t happen. We all see supply chains in the trade environment and general risk being elevated in many companies across many sectors stocking up or stocking down.
You know, is this something that may manifest for you just as a risk mitigation effort? You know, you also lean towards risk reduction versus deleveraging through inventory monetization, but or you really have no reason to have to do that. I think you can take it as written, Kyle. The intention is to throw off a lot of cash in the second half. We’re well positioned with inventory.
And the rate of sale that we’ve had and that we anticipate through Q3 and into Q4 should get us where we need to go by year end. So we feel confident about that. Okay. Thanks for that confidence boost. Second one from me, just a higher level question.
One aspect about one aspect of your long term value creation framework. So that framework calls for EBITDA margins in the range of 8% to 10%. I’m curious on how you get from the lower end of that range where you’ve been prevailing in recent years to the higher end of that range, you know, in a durable way. Is that something that can be achieved from the current mix of business on the back of things like efficiencies and best practices? Or is the higher end of that range something that will require more scale and mix shift over time through your m and a programs, you know, adding scale and awaiting towards higher margin categories and channels through time?
Any color on this stuff would would be appreciated. Sure. Yeah. I don’t think it needs to be dramatic, and we have operated above those margin rates in the past in different points of the market cycle. But there is significant amount of operating leverage through the P and L.
So obviously, top line additions will help, whether that be through volume or pricing. We do feel like there’s probably a tailwind here on pricing. We’ve seen that recently as well. And scale and product mix continuing to evolve as we have significantly shifted over the last number of years in part through just new supplier relationships, but also through our M and A program. We’ve continued to kind of upsize the specialty component of what we do.
So it’s not gonna be one one thing. It’s gonna be a combination of of factors that gets us into the higher end of that range over time. Got it. Okay. Thanks for the color.
I’ll I’ll pass it on. Thanks, Kyle. Next question is from Amir Patel from CIBC Capital Markets. Go ahead. Hi.
Good morning. Rob, we’re seeing a lot more larger M and A playing out in in the distribution space, has there been any evolution the M and A pipeline of the sort of scale and type of targets that you’re considering and any change in vendor expectations? I would say at this point, that’s we obviously are keenly watching what’s going on, and we’re enjoying watching building products, distributors trade at what we think are are good multiples. That’s not been in our space from a product perspective for one. So think of architectural building product categories as opposed to things like roofing and gypsum wallboard.
And it’s also been primarily around one step distribution. So, folks that are selling directly to builders, whereas we’re the two step channel and servicing a very important supply chain requirement with what we’re doing. So those things combined, we’re keeping our eye on it, of course, but they’re not impacting our own acquisitions pipeline and our management of our M and A program going forward at this point. Okay. And Rob, do see any impact on your business from the master brand American Woodmark combination?
Well, was just yesterday, so not not at this point. But, you know, we we view the continued consolidation up upstream and downstream generally as a positive for us because you’re working with partners that are larger, more sophisticated, and they’re looking for, the same in their distribution partners that can bring them worldwide sourcing solutions and a national footprint and scale solutions, multi geography, multiproduct type of solutions. So generally, we like that. American Woodmark, Masterbrand and Cabinetworks are the kind of the big three from an OEM cabinet manufacturing perspective. And we do do some OEM business for sure, but we are focused very much also on the smaller midsized, more regional and specialty customers as well.
So they’re just one piece of the channel. Okay. Great. And just the last question I had. So is there any sense of the timing of when you can expect the refund of the previously paid duties?
Hey, Hamir. So the way I would describe that would be just from our understanding of the the the the way the law is written. That that should be payable to us within the next six six months, essentially, by the end of the year is our understanding, which is why we have the final results. We accrue this, and it’s sitting in, you know, on the current side of the the balance sheet. That’s where this information we have supports the position we’ve, you know, we’ve taken.
We will continue to look for communication out of customs and border patrols to administer this as to timing and if they decide to do something different, but that’s the information we have we have today. Great. Thanks. That’s all I had. I’ll I’ll turn it over.
Next question is from Ian Galise from Stifel. Good morning, guys. Hey, Ian. For the July sales, average daily sales never been down 4%, are you able to provide, I guess, any detail around what are that volume and what are that price? Just given tariffs, it’s a little hard to measure that number just in isolation on its own.
Yes. I mean, we wanted to put that number out there to give people a little bit of a view of where things are at post the disclosure period. I would say that things improved more near the July than the earlier part. So it’s an early Q3 indicator that we can kind of look at. No specific comment on the price versus volume.
Just think it’s too early for that, Liam. But I would say that it’s not a specific geography. It’s not a specific product category. It’s an overall momentum comment across the business. Understood.
Are you able to maybe talk a bit about some of the feedback you’re getting from the various channels you work with? Obviously, you have your industrial distributors and your large big box retailer. Like, are you getting significantly different views from them, is it pretty consistent across each channel? No. Pretty consistent.
And we obviously follow the public company reporters in terms of the home centers, And then we get some good reporting out of customers like BFS. And I wouldn’t say that there’s any specific diversion there nor would I call out anything specifically different from the industrial channel. Understood. Thanks very much. I’ll turn it back over.
Thanks, Ian. Next question is from Zachary Evershed from National Bank Financial. Please go ahead. Good morning, guys. Congrats on the quarter.
Hey. Good morning, Zach. Poking on that reading in July, would would you say it’s fair to say that there was a kind of a gradual slowing into June and then July that might hint at some overall momentum as you mentioned? Well, I I mean, it’s four weeks. We’ve I probably wouldn’t say either of us would try to parse it anymore than I I just did, which is to say there’s a little more momentum near the July than the beginning.
So we’ll have to see how things proceed through the balance of the quarter here. Oh, I apologize on that. If you could just press the star button again on that question. I didn’t mean to cut you off. I thought you were done, Zachary.
I apologize for that. In the meantime, we do have Kyle McPhee from Cormark Securities. Go ahead, Kyle. Hello again. Thanks for all the disclosure on on your tariff exposure right now and what it could become in this fluid type of environment.
My question is based on what is impacted by tariffs right now, that 14% bucket at at a 16% tariff rate, is is price the tool you will use to deal with this bucket? Or is this specific, you know, mix of products something you’ll deal with by shifting supply chains? I’m just trying to get a feel for your price how how your pricing variable is gonna manifest in the coming quarters based on, you know, what you know about the elasticity and substitutes in these specific drivers. Yes. No, I understand the question.
We the pricing is definitely main lever to pull here. There we operate a price pass through model. And while we’re in a more unusual time as it relates to tariffs and, I guess, having to be more dynamic with pricing, that’s how we intend to deal with that. We will obviously look at moving supply chains around where we need to, but we’re not sole sourced. So we’ve got the ability to move our purchase order book around between jurisdictions if we have to.
But I think the most salient point is the first one, which is if our sourcing costs go up, our intention is to pass that through and maintain our margin. Much different. Hey, Kyle. We had you break up on us. Would you mind repeating the question?
Yeah. Just on the 14% figure, I think that’s percentage of product mix. Would it be much different on a percentage of revenue basis? No. No.
Consistent. Okay. Thank you. That’s it for me. You bet.
Okay. We have Zachary back from National Bank Financial. Zachary, again, I apologize for cutting you off. You could continue on. Thank you very much.
For gross margin, are you expecting any pressure going forward as you run down stock of pre tariff inventory or a temporary lift in the new pricing environment? I mean, it’s an interesting comment to make when you’ve got pricing move with shocks and being more dynamic. You can have intermediate impacts as you’re passing prices through one way or the other. So there could be a little bit of noise back in gross profit margin, but nothing that we expect to be a significant item. We’ll just be most focused on passing through costs and maintaining our role in channel as a distributor offering product solutions, but not trying to time markets and load inventory up or down, but provide those through on a smooth basis as we can.
But we feel like the current gross profit margin range that you’ve seen is within a range we’re very made we’ve Hi. Good morning, Rob and Ben. Thanks for taking my questions. And Are you seeing any different trends good morning. I guess, even more good morning for you.
Any difference in trends and consumer spending habits between Canada and The US? I I think we’ve all been fairly impressed by the continued resilience of The US consumer. I spend lots of time, obviously, down south traveling. And when whenever I’m in country, if I could say it say it that way, just the level of, you know, optimism and let’s let’s work through things and solve problems. And the entrepreneurial spirit is is always impressive when you go to to to The US.
I think Canada, just naturally, is is maybe a little bit more cautious and and prudent as we go. But as you saw from the the quarterly result, you know, Canada’s performing performing very well for us. So, you know, that that’s probably how I would characterize the the North South as an opinion. Interesting. And and, Rob, could you just clarify the cadence of daily sales that you saw from the quarter and into July was it seems like the first two weeks of July was below, and it since improved even marginally, but still we had that bottom in the July.
Is that correct way of thinking of things? I like your word marginally. Yes. First half, second half of the month of July, there was a marginal pickup there. Perfect.
And I may have missed this, but you did upsize the potential tariff exposure at the current rates that you guys are estimating. Do you have any concerns about passing that through? No. I mean, that’s the playbook. It’s not like we are, as a distributor, sourcing we’re facing different sourcing conditions than our competitors are.
So we’ll see how the market behaves. But as we’ve seen in other periods of pricing volatility, there’s generally been fairly good competitive discipline. So absent us seeing something different at that point, we’re expecting the same and that others will react accordingly. Okay. That’s really good color.
And maybe just one more from me. Are you able to give an update on how Wolf performed in the quarter? Just looking at the results, it seems like they did significantly well. I know there’s some seasonality in the business, but still looks like a nice uptick from Q3, Q4, Q1 into Q2. Yes.
Your observations are bang on in both respects. It is a business that’s got a decent amount of seasonality to it because of the premium decking products that are included in their product mix. But setting that aside, the team’s done a great job. They’re all still there, settled in as part of the Odentura family, and we’re very pleased with them. And I think they’re very pleased with where they’ve landed the business as well.
So we’re pleased with how that acquisition is proceeding. We’re, I guess, one just about a year into it, and no surprises. Next question is from Fredrik Tremblay from Desjardins. Please go ahead. Thank you.
Good morning. Good morning. Most of my my questions have been answered already, but maybe one on on the sales dynamics there. I’m just trying to reconcile the strong Q2 with your disclosure of a 4% decline on average daily sales in July. Do you feel that there was some demand pull forward in Q2 or nothing out of the ordinary to call out on that front?
Nothing to call out. There’s no factors that would indicate a a pull forward with our customer base. And, again, we’re trying to help you all out with just a little bit of how things are proceeding post the quarter. And, you know, things can move around. We’ve got a ways to go yet, I guess, within my point with the quarter.
But through July, that’s where things were sitting relative to the pace we saw on average during q two. Understood. Appreciate the color. Thank you. Tone phone.
You’ll hear a prompt that your hand has been raised. We’ll wait one moment for any additional questions. It appears there are no further questions at this time. I’d now like to turn the call back over to Rob Brown, Adventure’s President and CEO for final closing comments. Okay.
Thanks, Josh. Appreciate you hosting us today. And if there’s any follow ups from anyone on the call, please reach out to Fez or I. We’ll be responsive to your questions. And I hope everybody has a great day.
Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes your conference call for today. We thank you for participating and ask that you please disconnect your lines. Have a great day.
This article was generated with the support of AI and reviewed by an editor. For more information see our T&C.