Earnings call transcript: H.B. Fuller Q3 2025 sees slight EPS beat amid revenue miss

H.B. Fuller Company reported its third-quarter earnings, revealing an EPS of $1.26, slightly surpassing the forecast of $1.25. Revenue came in at $892 million, falling short of the anticipated $896.55 million. The company, currently trading at a P/E ratio of 31.54, appears undervalued according to InvestingPro’s Fair Value model. In immediate market reaction, the company’s stock dropped 8.89% in premarket trading, reflecting investor concerns over the revenue miss and the broader economic environment.

Want to discover more undervalued opportunities? Check out our Most Undervalued Stocks list on InvestingPro.

Key Takeaways

• EPS exceeded expectations by a small margin, reaching $1.26 against a forecast of $1.25.
• Revenue fell short of projections, at $892 million versus $896.55 million expected.
• The stock declined by 8.89% in premarket trading following the earnings release.
• Growth in medical adhesives and data center solutions was highlighted as strong performers.
• The company faces challenges from global economic conditions and uneven customer demand.

Company Performance

H.B. Fuller’s performance in the third quarter of 2025 was marked by a slight EPS beat but a revenue miss. The company, with a market capitalization of $3.1 billion and trailing twelve-month EBITDA of $542.3 million, continues to navigate a challenging global economic environment. Particular strength was noted in its medical adhesives and data center solutions segments. Despite these positive developments, the overall revenue decline reflects ongoing difficulties in the manufacturing sector and global trade tensions. InvestingPro analysis reveals the company maintains strong financial health scores, particularly in profitability (3.62 out of 5).

Financial Highlights

• Revenue: $892 million, down 2.8% year-on-year
• Earnings per share: $1.26, up 12% year-on-year
• Adjusted gross profit margin: 32.3%, an increase of 190 basis points
• Operating cash flow: Increased by 13% year-on-year

Earnings vs. Forecast

H.B. Fuller reported an EPS of $1.26, slightly above the forecast of $1.25, resulting in a 0.8% surprise. However, the revenue of $892 million missed the forecast of $896.55 million, indicating a -0.51% surprise. This mixed performance reflects the company’s ongoing efforts to manage costs and optimize its portfolio amid challenging market conditions.

Market Reaction

The market reacted negatively to H.B. Fuller’s earnings report, with the stock price dropping 8.89% in premarket trading to $54. This decline is significant, especially considering the stock’s 52-week high of $82.39 and low of $47.56. The revenue miss and broader economic concerns likely contributed to investor caution.

Outlook & Guidance

For the fiscal year 2025, H.B. Fuller expects net revenue to decline by 2-3%, with organic revenue flat to up 1%. The company forecasts adjusted EBITDA growth of 4-5%, reaching $615-$625 million, and adjusted EPS growth of 7-11%, ranging from $4.10 to $4.25. These projections underscore the company’s focus on strategic growth and operational efficiency. Notably, H.B. Fuller has maintained dividend payments for 55 consecutive years and raised them for 32 straight years, demonstrating remarkable financial stability.

Discover more valuable insights about H.B. Fuller and 1,400+ other companies through comprehensive Pro Research Reports, available exclusively on InvestingPro.

Executive Commentary

CEO Celeste Mastin emphasized the company’s strategic approach, stating, "We are diligently focused on the variables we can control." She also highlighted the team’s commitment to delivering on long-term EBITDA margin and growth targets, adding, "The team is approaching the business very strategically."

Risks and Challenges

• Global economic challenges and manufacturing sector weakness.
• Uneven customer demand and less predictable market conditions.
• Potential impact of global trade tensions and export uncertainties.
• Need for continued cost reduction and efficiency improvements.
• Risks associated with expanding product ranges into new geographies.

Q&A

During the earnings call, analysts inquired about H.B. Fuller’s strategy in the solar market and the de-emphasis on low-margin product lines. The company also addressed pricing and raw material cost actions, cross-selling opportunities, and the potential impact of lower interest rates on its business segments.

Full transcript - HB Fuller Comp (FUL) Q3 2025:

Operator: Hello and welcome to the H.B. Fuller Company Third Quarter 2025 Earnings Conference Call. All lines have been placed on mute to prevent any background noise. After the speaker’s remarks, there will be a question and answer session, and if you would like to ask a question during this time, please press 1 on your telephone keypad. I would now like to turn the conference over to Scott Jensen, Head of Investor Relations. You may begin.

Scott Jensen, Head of Investor Relations, H.B. Fuller Company: Thank you, Operator. Welcome to H.B. Fuller’s Third Quarter 2025 Investor Conference Call. Presenting today are Celeste Mastin, President and Chief Executive Officer, and John Corkrean, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. After our prepared remarks, we will have a question and answer session. Before we begin, let me remind everyone that our comments today will include references to certain non-GAAP financial measures. These measures are supplemental to the results determined in accordance with GAAP. We believe that these measures are useful to investors in understanding our operating performance and to compare our performance with other companies. Reconciliations of non-GAAP measures to the nearest GAAP measure are included in our earnings release. Unless otherwise noted, comments about revenue refer to organic revenue, and comments about EPS, EBITDA, and profit margins refer to adjusted non-GAAP measures. We will also be making forward-looking statements during this call.

These statements are based on current expectations and assumptions that are subject to risks and uncertainties. Actual results could differ materially from these expectations due to factors covered in our earnings release, comments made during this call, and the risk factors detailed in our filings with the SEC, all of which are available on our website at investors.hbfuller.com. I will now turn the call over to Celeste Mastin. Celeste?

Celeste Mastin, President and Chief Executive Officer, H.B. Fuller Company: Thank you, Scott, and welcome everyone. We delivered a strong quarter, evidenced by continued margin expansion and double-digit EPS growth despite the challenging operating environment. Our continued operational discipline, strong execution, and ongoing portfolio shift keep us on track to achieve our greater than 20% EBITDA margin target. Despite our strong performance, we remain cautious and have tightened our guidance range for the year to reflect a globally subdued economic backdrop. Looking forward, we expect volume growth to remain elusive and end market conditions to be challenging. However, we continue to actively focus on enhancing the composition of our portfolio, driving continued efficiencies, and structurally repositioning the company for growth and continued margin expansion consistent with our long-term strategy. Looking at our results in the third quarter, our organic sales were slightly negative, consistent with our expectations given economic headwinds.

Organic sales decreased 0.9%, with positive pricing of 1%, offset by a volume decline of 1.9%. From a profitability perspective, we executed well and delivered strong results. We grew EBITDA 3% year-on-year to $171 million and expanded EBITDA margin to 19.1%, up 110 basis points year-on-year, including positive EBITDA growth and margin expansion in all three GBUs. The net impact of pricing and raw material cost actions, the contribution of acquisitions and divestitures, and targeted cost reduction efforts drove the increase in margin relative to the prior year. Now let me move on to review the performance in each of our segments in the third quarter. In HHC, organic revenue softened sequentially as we saw the effects of continued economic uncertainty impact consumption trends. Organic revenue decreased 3.1% as positive pricing actions were offset by weaker volume.

Strength in medical and tissue and towel was offset by broad-based end market softness, particularly in some of our packaging-related market segments. EBITDA was up 2% year-on-year for HHC in the third quarter, and EBITDA margin increased 50 basis points year-on-year to 16.9%. Positive pricing and the impact from acquisitions were partially offset by negative volume leverage. In Engineering Adhesives, organic revenue increased 2.2% in the third quarter, driven by both positive pricing and volumes. EA continues to lead the portfolio as positive organic growth was driven by ongoing strength in automotive and a bounce-back in electronics. Solar continues to be a headwind as a result of regulatory changes, tariff-driven ambiguity, and the oversupplied global panel market. Excluding solar, EA organic growth was positive mid-single digits. We continue to see the benefits of our strategic growth focus in EA against a still difficult backdrop.

Overall, more than half of the market segments in EA saw positive volume growth during the third quarter. EBITDA increased 14% in EA, and EBITDA margin expanded 190 basis points year-on-year to 23.3%. Positive volume leverage, the impact of net price and raw material cost management, and efficiency gains drove the increase in EBITDA margin year-on-year. In Building Adhesive Solutions, organic sales decreased 1% year-on-year as positive pricing actions were offset by modest volume declines. BAS performed as expected, as the construction market-related slowdown we identified last quarter was partially mitigated by the team’s strong execution. Although construction demand remains weak, we expect a declining interest rate environment will drive an improvement in building conditions and ultimately benefit BAS moving forward. EBITDA for BAS increased 3% versus the third quarter of last year to $41 million, and EBITDA margin expanded 10 basis points to 17.7%.

Net price and raw material cost management drove the improvement in EBITDA margin year-on-year. Geographically, Americas organic revenue was up 1% year-on-year in the third quarter. EA drove the increase for the region, achieving a high single-digit increase with positive organic growth across most market segments. BAS organic revenue was slightly positive versus the prior year, and HHC organic revenue was down modestly. In EIMEA, organic revenue declined 2% year-on-year, similar to the second quarter, as continued weakness in Europe weighed down the region. EA was flat year-on-year, while HHC and BAS were both down modestly. In Asia-Pacific, organic revenue decreased 4% year-on-year, driven by the significant volume decline in solar. Excluding solar, organic sales for Asia-Pacific were approximately flat year-on-year, and organic revenue for EA in the region was up 7% year-on-year, driven by strong results in automotive and electronics.

From our vantage point, which reflects a broad-based geographic and end-market view, we have observed a widespread slowing economic environment. The manufacturing sector continues to be weak and has shown some signs of softening. Customer demand is appearing more uneven and less predictable, driven by global trade tensions and export-driven uncertainty. In general, customers are hesitant to make product changes and incremental investments, given economic volatility and high interest rates. Therefore, looking forward, we expect a slow growth environment with a continuation of these themes. Now let me turn the call over to John Corkrean to review our third quarter results in more detail and our updated outlook for 2025.

Scott Jensen, Head of Investor Relations, H.B. Fuller Company: Thank you, Celeste. I’ll begin with some additional financial details on the third quarter. For the quarter, revenue was down 2.8% versus the same period last year. Currency had a positive impact of 1%, and the net impact of acquisitions and divestitures decreased revenue by 2.9%. Adjusting for those items, organic revenue was down 0.9%, with pricing up 1% and volume down 1.9% year-on-year in the quarter. Adjusted gross profit margin was 32.3%, up 190 basis points versus last year. The net impact of pricing and raw material cost actions, the benefit of acquisitions and divestitures, and targeted cost reduction efforts drove the year-on-year increase in adjusted gross profit margin. Adjusted selling, general, and administrative expense was up 3% year-on-year. Adjusting for M&A, FX, and variable comp, SG&A was flat year-on-year, reflecting diligent cost control.

Adjusted EBITDA for the quarter of $171 million was up 3% year-on-year, reflecting the positive net impact of pricing and raw material cost actions, which more than offset higher wage inflation and lower volume. The net impact of acquisitions and divestitures was neutral to EBITDA year-on-year. Adjusted earnings per share of $1.26 was up 12% versus the third quarter of 2024, driven by higher adjusted net income and lower shares outstanding. Third quarter operating cash flow was up 13% year-on-year, primarily driven by improved profitability. Net debt to adjusted EBITDA decreased from 3.4 times at the end of the second quarter to 3.3 times at the end of the third quarter of fiscal 2025. Solid cash flow from operations, growth in adjusted EBITDA, and our intentional slowdown in M&A activity drove the sequential decrease in our leverage ratio.

With that, let me now turn to our guidance for the 2025 fiscal year. As a result of our year-to-date performance and the current macroeconomic conditions summarized by Celeste, we are updating our previously communicated financial guidance for fiscal 2025 as follows. Net revenue is still expected to be down 2 to 3% year-on-year. We now expect organic revenue to be flat to up 1% year-on-year and expect foreign exchange to adversely impact revenue by approximately 1% year-on-year. We are tightening our adjusted EBITDA range for the year to $615 to $625 million, equating to growth of 4 to 5% year-on-year. This compares favorably to our initial 2025 full-year guidance of $600 to $625 million. We now expect our 2025 core tax rate to be between 26 and 26.5% and expect full-year interest expense to be between $125 and $130 million.

Combined, these assumptions now result in full-year adjusted diluted EPS in the range of $4.10 to $4.25, equating to year-on-year growth of between 7% and 11%. We now expect full-year operating cash flow to be between $275 and $300 million, reflecting slightly higher inventory levels in preparation for our manufacturing footprint optimization. Finally, we reduced our full-year capital spending target to approximately $140 million for the year. Now let me turn the call back over to Celeste to wrap us up.

Celeste Mastin, President and Chief Executive Officer, H.B. Fuller Company: Thank you, John. As we entered 2025, we anticipated a challenging macroeconomic environment where both volume growth and margin expansion would be difficult. This sentiment was further exacerbated by the upending of global trade relations and tariff-driven disruption. As a result of our expectation for a difficult year, we took early and proactive measures, delivering strong execution on pricing and raw material management, as well as cost controls, while placing an emphasis on operational efficiency. These actions are clearly paying off, as evidenced by our third quarter results. While we are not immune from an economic slowdown, we are diligently focused on the variables we can control, starting with providing outstanding service and support to our customers.

We are a demonstrated and critical partner to our customers as they grapple with potential changes to everything from the point of origin of the materials they buy to their manufacturing locations and processes. This is increasingly valuable in this time of material optionality and supply chain disruption. To wrap up, we are pleased with the progress we continue to make in improving our portfolio, streamlining our operations, and driving EBITDA margin expansion. While volume growth remains challenged, we have a clear and focused strategy and a highly experienced team that is well prepared to execute and drive operational success. We remain on track to deliver on our long-term EBITDA margin and growth targets.

As a reminder, we look forward to seeing you at our Investor Day on October 20, where we will provide an update on our strategic plan, including our successful M&A strategy, transformational footprint optimization, and roadmap to our greater than 20% EBITDA margin goal. That concludes our prepared remarks for today. Operator, please open the line for questions.

Operator: Thank you. If you would like to ask a question, please press 1 on your telephone keypad. If you would like to withdraw your question, simply press 1 again. Please ensure that your phone is not on mute when called upon. Thank you. Your first question comes from David Begleiter with Deutsche Bank. Your line is open.

Celeste Mastin, President and Chief Executive Officer, H.B. Fuller Company: Good morning. This is Emily Fusco on for David Begleiter with Deutsche Bank. Could you provide some more detail behind the reduction in cash flow guidance? Thanks. Good morning. Good morning, Emily. John, do you want to cover cash flow?

Scott Jensen, Head of Investor Relations, H.B. Fuller Company: Sure. It really just comes down to working capital, specifically inventory, Emily. As we’ve, in preparation, and we’re actually kind of in, I would say, in process on a number of these footprint consolidation actions, we’re trying to manage inventory a little differently to accommodate these, which requires us to keep higher inventory levels. That’s driving the increase in working capital and the decrease in cash flow expectations for the year. I would just add that they’re temporary, right? They’re positioning us for these changes, and we would expect that we would reduce inventory to more normal levels in the future.

Celeste Mastin, President and Chief Executive Officer, H.B. Fuller Company: Got it. Thank you.

Operator: The next question comes from Patrick Kivits with Citigroup. Your line is open.

Celeste Mastin, President and Chief Executive Officer, H.B. Fuller Company: Morning, Patrick.

Hi, this is actually Alex on Patrick’s team. Thanks for taking my question. For me, what kind of struck me as interesting was that in EA, autos and durables, you’re kind of saying that things are okay. I’m just curious, did anything accelerate in the quarter, or was anything, whether it’s in the mix or any kind of accretion from the acquisitions? What kind of helped EA volumes there and margins there? Thank you.

Right. Absolutely. In the EA business, we had a great quarter, and a few things happened there that are notable. In Q2, you might recall if you were on at that time, Alex, that we said we were experiencing a temporary lull in the electronics market in Q2, and that in the second half, we would see those volumes resurface as more and more product upgrades were coming out featuring our adhesive and some wins there as we continue to take share. That was one thing that did happen during the quarter favorably. Our electronics business returned to globally double-digit organic growth. Also, in the quarter, we saw great performance improvement in our U.S. EA business. In Q2, we had seen that business operating at negative mid-single-digit organic growth. In Q3, in EA in the U.S., the business drove forward to positive mid-single-digit organic growth.

A lot of that based on some share take and new customer wins, but also just really strong execution by our sales and technical service teams. We are seeing some good momentum in the EA business, and we expect that to continue going forward.

Great, thank you very much.

Operator: The next question comes from Ghansham Panjabi with Baird. Your line is open.

Hi, good morning. It is actually.

Celeste Mastin, President and Chief Executive Officer, H.B. Fuller Company: Morning, Ghansham. Good to hear you.

Celeste, just going back to prepared comments and the caution you shared for obviously good reason, how would you explain the HHC decline in volumes versus EA in context of HHC generally speaking being considered a little bit more defensive versus EA, which has multiple dimensions of exposure, including to some of the cyclical end markets? How would you have us think about that?

Yeah, the way I think about that, Ghansham, is our EA business today is performing much stronger than the market. I do think we’re still seeing slowing in durable goods. However, that team, as I mentioned, as it relates to electronics, but also as it relates to automotive, has really been successfully growing their business, taking share, bringing unique solutions to the customer base, and that has facilitated their above-market growth. In the HHC business, we saw strong pricing performance around the globe in the third quarter. However, volumes were really tough to come by, Ghansham, and they really are a reflection of the consumer. In all major regions, the Americas, Europe, Asia, we saw mid-single-digit declines in HHC volume, and I just think that’s a reflection of the eroding global economic consumer.

Got it. In past calls, you’ve given us some characterization in terms of your different GBUs and the number that are decelerating versus accelerating. Can you do that this go around as well? How did 3Q actually shape up as it relates to the different GBUs?

Yeah, so in the business in total, about 18 of our market segments out of 30 were accelerating. What we saw typically was in every GBU, that the case for about half of them. Nothing really notable there. I’m pleased that we were able to deliver a quarter that demonstrated EBITDA margin expansion and positive pricing in all GBUs and maintained that sort of mid-level of acceleration. It didn’t take all of our segments operating in concert positively to deliver that.

Okay, and then just one final one as it relates to the outlook for, you know, fiscal year 2026, which isn’t that far away. Is solar, will that fully have cycled through as it relates to the negative volumes by then, or will there be some sort of lingering flow through into fiscal year 2026?

Yeah, let’s talk about solar, just the solar strategy, solar technology, and then what you should expect from a revenue and an EBITDA margin perspective. In the global solar industry, we operate supplying three different product lines essentially to that space. Two of the three of those product lines are very specialized, and in fact, they are critical in enabling more efficient solar panels to be produced and introduced in the future upcoming years. We’re continuing to emphasize those product ranges. The third product range, which is more of a silicon sealant type of product, became really a challenging part of that market, particularly in China, as construction in China slowed down and those sealants were redirected into the solar industry. That’s a part of the market where we’re going to be de-emphasizing our focus.

With all of that as the technology backdrop and the market backdrop to what’s going on, what you’ll see in the P&L is that on the top line, there will continue to be headwinds as it relates to revenue as we continue to draw back away from the silicon sealant product line in particular regions. What you will also see, however, is a shoring up of EBITDA and EBITDA margin as we’re exiting that lower margin space.

Okay, very helpful. Thank you very much.

Operator: The next question comes from Mike Harrison with Seaport Research Partners. Your line is open.

Celeste Mastin, President and Chief Executive Officer, H.B. Fuller Company: Morning, Mike.

Hi, good morning. I appreciate you taking my question. You’ve talked about this, I believe it was $55 million worth of kind of pricing versus raw material cost tailwinds for the year. I was hoping you could give us a sense of where we stand on that. Are you tracking above or below that number? How much of it is yet to be realized? Maybe give us a little bit of a sense of how you’re seeing raw material costs trending as we start to think about price cost and some potential tailwind from that into fiscal 2026.

Sure. That’s correct. At the beginning of the year, we established that in order to achieve our guidance of $600 to $625 million of EBITDA, we would be delivering $55 million of price and raw material cost action benefits. It’s less about how the market’s trending, more about the actions that we were taking on raw materials in order to get there. If you look at our progress as of the first half, as I mentioned last quarter, we had achieved about $5 million of that. However, we also established that we have taken all of the actions that we needed to take in order to make both of those factors, price and raw material savings, come to fruition.

What we realized over the course of this quarter is that the cadence for those savings is going to be slower than we anticipated, given that we have more material inventory in preparation for this footprint optimization. Through third quarter, we’ve generated about $15 million of the $55 million of price and cost action. We anticipate another $15 million benefit in Q4, and then the remainder will wrap around into the beginning of next year. In the interim, in order to still achieve our guidance, we did take action to pull forward some of our footprint optimization savings. We still feel very confident, and as you see, we brought up the bottom end of our range last quarter, have just tightened it now to be able to achieve $615 to $625 million of EBITDA this year.

All right, it sounds like maybe $20 million or $25 million yet to come in 2026. Is that the way we should think about it?

Correct.

Okay, perfect. My other question for you is, you guys have had a number of organic growth initiatives since you took over, Celeste. Also done a number of bolt-ons over the past couple of years. As you look at the cross-selling and geographic expansion opportunities, I’m just curious if you can talk about how much faster than underlying markets do you think you can grow in the next year or two? It sounds like you’re really delivering on that potential in EA, but I’m just curious, can it accelerate in EA, and what do you think about the other two segments?

Yes, it has accelerated EA. In fact, I was really pleased just the other day to be talking to one of our leaders here in the U.S. and finding that we have adopted the Vibertype product range from ND Industries into our HVAC product range. We are expanding the ND Industries products very quickly. In fact, you will see an expansion by the conclusion of the year of those in multiple additional geographies, three new locations versus where that business was when we acquired it last year. The other thing I would say is, you know, we’ve been really pleased with the medical adhesives business. It’s a business where we’re growing businesses that we acquired into new geographies. In fact, if you look at the medical adhesives technology business, the EBITDA has doubled and revenues are up 60% with EBITDA margins over 40% just this year. We’re really excited.

We’re validated that our strategy is delivering in the manner that we originally anticipated, and you see that in the EBITDA expansion numbers. It’s been a prime contributor.

All right, any comment on BAS? I know that the Middle East in particular has been an expansion initiative.

The Middle East has been an expansion. You know, that business, I know organic growth was down 1% this quarter, but bear in mind, it held in there well on a very good comp from Q3 prior year. In fact, Q3 of 2024, our roofing business, which is one of the bigger businesses in that GBU, was up 30% organic growth. The business is performing well. We’re seeing adoption of our 4SG insulated glass sealant. In fact, we just won a couple of projects in Japan. We’re seeing kind of geographical expansion of that business and are pleased with its performance. Yes, the Middle East represents a great opportunity for us there.

All right, thanks very much.

Operator: The next question comes from Kevin McCarthy with Vertical Research Partners. Your line is open.

Hi, this is Matt Hettwer on for Kevin McCarthy. Staying with BAS, as the Fed presumably continues to cut interest rates moving forward, what kind of lag effects do you expect to see between the timing of lower interest rates and how they might feed through to stronger results in that business? Are there any specific underlying business lines in BAS, such as maybe glass or woodworking, that you think might benefit from lower interest rates more than others?

Celeste Mastin, President and Chief Executive Officer, H.B. Fuller Company: Yeah, so lower interest rates tend to impact our business, call it 15 to 18 months later than we would see them in the architectural billing index. That said, there will be more immediate impacts of lower interest rates, both on that business and at H.B. Fuller Company. I mean, just the mobility that lower interest rates create, the possibility for household formation and moving households helps bolster our business in many ways. The HHC business would benefit from that. In BAS, specifically the woodworking business, think furniture would benefit from that. Ultimately, we don’t have to see building as a consequence of interest rates to get the benefit. We will see indirect benefits in addition.

Great, thank you. I guess one more for BAS. You know, data centers have been a source of strength to you. I was wondering if you could just give us a sense for how large that business is. I assume it’s maybe on the smaller side, but is the high growth rate there relative to the size of the business, you know, is that strong enough for it to have a meaningful impact on segment results moving forward?

Yeah, so the data center business, just to speak more broadly, and then John, maybe you can speak to it relative to H.B. Fuller. More broadly, the data center business grew this year at 40%, as I understand it, and the outlook is for that business to continue to grow at a rate of, call it, 30%. Our BAS business has taken a very strategic approach to data center building. We’ve long been part of the specification for the roofing systems in data centers, and now that we have revised that GBU and have different market segments working together, we’ve been able to bring a package of adhesives to support different parts of the structure. I think I mentioned last quarter I was pretty wild about the flooring adhesive we’ve introduced for panels and raised floors in data centers that dissipate electrostatic energy.

The team is approaching the business very strategically. John, do you want to comment on just how to contextualize that?

Scott Jensen, Head of Investor Relations, H.B. Fuller Company: Maybe to dimensionalize the size. Most of this activity resides in our roofing business, which is 100% commercial focus. That business is between 5% and 10% of total revenue. I’m going to guess data center solutions are less than half of that, but they’re growing quickly. It’s a true strategic focus area. It’s a high margin business, and the team’s done a great job of winning new business to really drive both, you know, take advantage of both the underlying macro trends, but win new business on top of that.

Great, thank you.

Operator: Once again, if you have a question, it is 1 on your telephone keypad. Your next question comes from Lydia Huang with JPMorgan. Your line is open.

Celeste Mastin, President and Chief Executive Officer, H.B. Fuller Company: Hi, good morning.

Morning, Lydia.

Morning. Could you give some color on the pricing trends for your segments in the fourth quarter? Thank you.

Sure. As you probably noticed, Lydia, the businesses, all three GBUs, were positive price year-on-year in Q3. There is a very supportive pricing environment in the market, given so much inflation, tariffs, et cetera. In fact, speaking of the fourth quarter, I actually just was reading a survey that was done here in the U.S. by the Adhesives and Sealants Council. They had surveyed their members to understand, amongst other things, how they were responding to tariffs, and pricing was one question related to that. 84% of the respondents to that survey, that are all adhesives and sealants companies, responded that they were raising price. It is a very supportive pricing environment, and I think you’ll continue to see that throughout the fourth quarter.

Thank you.

Operator: There are no further questions at this time. I’ll turn the call to Celeste Mastin, CEO, for closing remarks.

Celeste Mastin, President and Chief Executive Officer, H.B. Fuller Company: Thank you very much for joining the call today. We look forward to speaking with you next quarter. Have a great day.

Operator: This concludes today’s conference call. Thank you for joining. You may now disconnect.

This article was generated with the support of AI and reviewed by an editor. For more information see our T&C.