SoftBank Group Q2 profit blows past expectations; sells Nvidia stake for $5.8 bln
TriNet Group Inc. (TNET) reported its Q2 2025 earnings, showing stable revenue year-over-year while implementing strategic initiatives to enhance its market position. With a market capitalization of $3.04 billion, the company maintained its revenue within the guidance range and demonstrated a focus on innovation and operational efficiency. According to InvestingPro analysis, TNET is currently trading near its 52-week low of $61.26, while their Fair Value calculations suggest the stock is undervalued. TriNet’s stock remained stable in the pre-market session, reflecting investor confidence in its strategic direction.
Key Takeaways
- Total revenue remained flat year-over-year, aligning with the company’s guidance.
- Adjusted earnings per share (EPS) were $1.15, indicating strong operational performance.
- TriNet launched new AI-enabled tools and expanded partnerships, signaling a focus on innovation.
- The company reduced operating expenses by 2.2%, highlighting efficiency efforts.
- Worksite employees (WSEs) declined 4% year-over-year, reflecting industry challenges.
Company Performance
TriNet Group’s performance in Q2 2025 demonstrated stability in revenue despite a challenging macroeconomic environment. The company’s emphasis on innovation and operational efficiency helped mitigate the impact of a 4% decline in worksite employees. The technology, financial services, and nonprofit sectors showed resilience, supporting overall performance.
Financial Highlights
- Revenue: Approximately $5 billion, flat year-over-year
- Adjusted EPS: $1.15
- GAAP EPS: $0.77
- Adjusted EBITDA: $105 million (8.5% margin)
- Dividend per share: $0.275 (10% increase year-over-year)
Outlook & Guidance
TriNet provided full-year revenue guidance of $4.95 billion to $5.14 billion, maintaining a stable outlook despite industry challenges. The company aims to achieve an adjusted EBITDA margin of 7-8.5% and is targeting a return to an 87-90% insurance cost ratio by 2026. Upcoming initiatives include the launch of new health plan benefit bundles and a marketing campaign titled "Your Path, Our Purpose."
Executive Commentary
CEO Mike Simonds expressed optimism about the company’s future, stating, "We are on track to introduce our product and go-to-market improvements for our fall selling season." CFO Kelly Tuminelli highlighted the company’s strategic pricing adjustments, noting, "We are successfully repricing our benefit offerings, positioning us to return to our targeted ICR range in 2026."
Risks and Challenges
- Decline in worksite employees could impact future revenue growth.
- Macroeconomic uncertainty may lengthen sales cycles.
- Stable but elevated healthcare cost trends could pressure margins.
- Dependence on technology and financial services sectors for growth.
- Competitive market dynamics requiring continuous innovation.
Q&A
During the Q&A session, analysts focused on the lengthening sales cycle due to macroeconomic uncertainty and the stability of healthcare cost trends. The promising growth in the broker channel and slight improvements in customer hiring trends were also discussed, providing insights into the company’s strategic focus areas.
Full transcript - Trinet Grou (TNET) Q2 2025:
Operator: Good day and welcome to the TriNet Group Inc. second quarter 2025 earnings conference call. All participants will be in listen-only mode. Should you need assistance, please signal a conference specialist by pressing the star key followed by zero. After today’s presentation, there will be an opportunity to ask questions. To ask a question, you may press star then one on your telephone keypad. To withdraw your question, please press star then two. Please note this event is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to Alex Bauer, Head of Investor Relations. Please go ahead.
Alex Bauer, Head of Investor Relations, TriNet Group Inc.: Thank you, Operator. Good morning, my name is Alex Bauer, TriNet’s Head of Investor Relations. Thank you for joining us and welcome to TriNet’s second quarter conference call and webcast. I’m joined today by our President and CEO, Mike Simonds, and our CFO, Kelly Tuminelli. Before we begin, I would like to preview this morning’s call. First, I’ll pass the call to Mike, where he will comment on our second quarter performance and discuss our progress on our strategy and medium term outlook. Kelly will then review our Q2 financial performance in greater detail.
Please note that today’s discussion will include references to our 2025 full year financial outlook or medium term outlook and other statements that are not historical in nature or predictive in nature, or depend upon or refer to future events or conditions such as our expectations, estimates, predictions, strategies, beliefs, or other statements that might be considered forward looking. These forward looking statements are based on management’s current expectations and assumptions and are inherently subject to risks, uncertainties, and changes in circumstances that are difficult to predict and that may cause actual results to differ materially from statements being made today or in the future. Except as may be required by law, we do not undertake to update any of these statements in light of new information, future events, or otherwise.
We encourage you to review our most recent public filings with the SEC, including our 10-K and 10-Q filings, for a more detailed discussion of the risks, uncertainties, and changes in circumstances that may affect our future results or the market price of our stock. In addition, our discussion today will include non-GAAP financial measures including our forward looking guidance for adjusted EBITDA and adjusted net income per diluted share. For reconciliations of our non-GAAP financial measures to our GAAP financial results, please see our earnings release, 10-Q filings, or our 10-K filing, which are or will be available on our website or through the SEC website. With that, I will turn the call over to Mike. Mike, thank you, Alex.
Mike Simonds, President and CEO, TriNet Group Inc.: In a quarter marked by significant market and economic volatility, TriNet delivered financial and operating performance consistent with our expectations, which allows us here at the end of the second quarter to reiterate our full year outlook. While there are several areas we are working quickly to improve, overall, I’m pleased with our results and with the execution of our plans to reposition TriNet for long term profitable growth. Our first priority is to deliver strong service and retain our customers as we reprice our benefits offering to account for the sustained health care cost trends being experienced across the market. We are on track with these efforts. Second, we are investing in our distribution capabilities and benefits offering in advance of the fall selling season, targeting improved momentum on the new business front.
Importantly, even as we improve our service, distribution, and offering, we continue to deliver prudent expense management and gain efficiencies, freeing up resources to reinvest in the business and building confidence in our team’s ability to execute. The challenging market and economic environment resulted in weaker business sentiment once again impacting sales, conversion rates, and customer hiring. This reality underscores the importance of the investments we’re making to differentiate our offering and go to market approach heading into our fall selling season. I’ll touch on our progress with these changes in just a minute. Before I go deeper into our financial and operating performance, I want to reiterate our strategy which frames how I talk about our business through the execution of our medium term strategy.
We intend for total revenues to achieve a compounded annual growth rate of 4 to 6% and our adjusted EBITDA margins to expand to 10 to 11%, which taken together will ultimately drive annualized value creation of 13 to 15% through earnings growth supplemented by share repurchases and dividends. Beginning with revenues, our second quarter was in line with our plan and we continue to expect full year 2025 total revenues to be in the range of $4.9 to $5.1 billion. The key drivers for revenue growth remain health plan fee increases, strong customer retention, and new sales growth emerging later in the year. While our full year forecast assumes net customer hiring will remain low throughout 2025, it’s worth noting we did see improvement in customer hiring this quarter, up about half a percentage point over prior year.
The second quarter is our most impactful customer hiring quarter, and this is the first Q2 in several years where we’ve seen year over year improvement. This second quarter also represents a modest three quarter positive trend in year over year CIE. We will watch closely to see if this positive trend continues in the coming quarters. Kelly will speak to some of the underlying drivers of CIE in her remarks. In terms of insurance revenues, we made further progress with our health plan fee increases during the quarter. We are balancing our need to reprice and improve our insurance cost ratio with our focus on retention and supporting our customers through this challenging environment. As a point of reference, during the second quarter we realized an average increase in health fees per enrolled member of roughly 9% when compared to prior year.
This is after plan design buy downs, which clients use to manage the fee increases and effectively reduces risk to TriNet. On a risk adjusted basis, we are achieving the pricing levels needed to improve our insurance cost ratio as planned. As I noted on our last call, we achieved our pricing targets with strong retention for our April 1st renewal. Similarly, our July 1st renewals have gone well thanks to the strong execution of my colleagues. Retention remains above our historical average both in our year to date results and in our outlook. As you might expect, combined with an uncertain economic environment, our health plan fee increases have created a headwind for sales when compared with last year. That said, the quality of the new customers coming on is strong, with a higher percentage falling into our targeted verticals and with sustainable insurance and professional services pricing.
We remain confident that as we move through the second half, new sales will begin to improve on a year over year basis. Part of this confidence is based on the encouraging results of market testing with our new health plan offering. Our new benefit bundles leverage our broad and growing set of carrier partnerships and plan designs paired with our proprietary data to create new combinations that meet customer needs for coverage and price and have the important added benefit of simplifying the sales process. I mentioned that our carrier partnerships are growing. We regularly look at the health insurance options in each of our markets and target the leading carriers with the best plans and the strongest networks. As we head into our fall selling season, we are adding attractive new options in markets which represent strong growth opportunities.
Our growing confidence in new sales is also based on the expansion of our go to market approach. We’ve established preferred broker programs with several national partners where we have aligned on new sales and retention targets, as well as created dedicated quoting, sales, and service teams. Beyond our national partnerships, we also increased our outreach, simplified the onboarding process, and enhanced compensation for local brokers. As a result of these efforts, we are beginning to see encouraging growth in the number of local brokers using our platform for our direct channel. We are launching new AI-enabled prospecting tools and have made several improvements to simplify and streamline the selling process for our reps. Our average median tenure continues to grow as we’ve had good success retaining our most tenured people.
Finally, perhaps some of you have noted our new marketing campaign, Your Path, Our Purpose, which highlights a number of TriNet’s amazing clients and the work we do in enabling them to grow their business. We have a great story to tell, and it’s gratifying to see the positive response in both our direct and brokerage channels. Overall, we are in a much improved go to market position as we enter the fall selling season, and indeed, we are already seeing strength in new business proposals for 3Q. Returning to our medium term strategy, the second feature is achieving our target margin of 10 to 11%. On this front, I’m pleased with both our disciplined approach to managing our insurance cost ratio and continued strong expense management. As mentioned earlier, we are achieving our health plan fee targets.
Investments we’ve made in insurance expertise, improved forecasting, and more disciplined process management are paying off. We now have observed more than six quarters of stable, albeit heightened, health care claim cost increases, and our confidence in the adequacy of our fee levels continues to strengthen. We are on track to deliver our forecasted 2025 insurance cost ratio and carry momentum into 2026, bringing us back into our long term targeted range of 87 to 90%. Our other major lever for achieving our margin target is expenses, and for the second straight quarter, expenses declined year over year and outperformed our forecast. We continue to benefit from our application of technology to our business processes and from our talent optimization. On the talent front, next month we open our new Atlanta office.
This office is central to our effort to build a stronger hybrid in-office culture supportive of talent development and enhanced collaboration, all happening in the middle of one of the fastest growing regions in the U.S. We are excited about TriNet’s future, and this office represents a significant investment in that future and our ability to invest in it even while improving margins overall. Our strong expense management and inline insurance cost ratio allowed us to continue our history of deploying capital through dividends and share repurchases while still investing in growth. In summary, having reached the midpoint of 2025, I’m pleased with our increasingly predictable results and stronger execution. We are on track to introduce our product and go-to-market improvements for our fall selling season.
We continue to price to risk, balancing the needs of our customers with our goal of returning our ICR to our target range, and we continue to optimize our business, gaining efficiencies while investing in talent and technology for the future. With that, let me pass the call to Kelly for her financial review.
Kelly Tuminelli, CFO, TriNet Group Inc.: Kelly, thank you, Mike. We’re pleased to see second quarter earnings in line with expectations. We are successfully repricing our benefit offerings, positioning us to return to our targeted ICR range in 2026. Like first quarter, these repricing efforts coupled with the uncertainty in the economy created a headwind for sales and retention. It’s important to note that we’re still on track to achieve our historical retention rate of 80% or better. We remain disciplined in our expense management while balancing the need to invest in initiatives to grow our business profitably as outlined in our medium term strategy. As we look to the second half, we’re positioned to improve go-to-market efforts and achieve our full year earnings guidance. Total revenue was flat in the second quarter on a year-over-year basis. Total revenue performance in the quarter was supported by insurance repricing and interest income.
Interest income was higher than originally forecasted, driven by increased balances attributable to the timing of tax refunds. Timing of these refunds is intermittent and difficult to predict. Customer hiring was slightly better than our overall estimate and supportive of total revenues. However, overall WSE volume declined due to customer attrition that was higher than new sales, proving to be an overall headwind to revenue growth. We finished the quarter with approximately 339,000 total WSEs, down 4% year-over-year, and 309,000 co-employed WSEs, down 8%. The decline in co-employed WSEs was driven by reduced new sales when compared with the prior year and higher overall attrition, with the incremental attrition driven largely due to health increases.
Similar to our Q1 experience, we faced a difficult Q2 sales comparison as we were operating in a much different expected health cost environment last year and we’ve sharpened our pricing discipline to reflect higher observed trends. Retention of co-employed WSEs was lower this quarter by approximately 1.5 points when compared to the prior year. Given our repricing efforts, we are pleased with our overall retention rates and we remain on track to beat our historical retention benchmark. As Mike noted, we experienced growth in CIE in the quarter. Historically, we’ve seen strong seasonal customer hiring in the second quarter as customers hire recent college grads or staff up for the summer months, and this year we saw that trend once again. Unique to this year, our existing customers reduced the number of gross reductions in force across their employee base.
The combination of hiring with customers holding on to more of their employees resulted in improved net hiring across nearly all of our core verticals, with technology, financial services, and nonprofits standing out. While we’re encouraged to see some improvement with customer hiring, total CIE in the quarter was about half a normal pre-COVID quarter, and given the broader environment, we are maintaining our current full year CIE forecast at a very low single digit contribution. Professional services revenue in the second quarter declined 8% year over year, largely due to two main reasons including lower WSE volumes as well as the discontinuation of a specific client-level technology fee. Professional services revenue was supported by mid single digit pricing strength. HRIS fees and ASO revenues, including those resulting from HRIS conversions, decreased slightly year over year as the company transitions away from a SaaS only solution.
The ASO conversion rate exceeded initial forecasts, indicating ongoing demand for services that partially mitigated the impact of reduced PEO volume. Total insurance revenue grew 1% in the second quarter. We are seeing the impact from our benefit repricing efforts as revenue per average enrolled member has increased by approximately 9% year over year. We expect sustained positive results from these repricing actions in the second half of the year, positioning us to achieve our targeted ICR range in 2026. Total insurance costs grew in the second quarter to 3%. As a result, our second quarter insurance cost ratio came in at a little over 90%. The ICR was slightly higher than we were originally expecting during the quarter, driven by a higher proportion of older health claims submitted this quarter that were incurred in early 2024, which was an anomaly relative to historical lag periods.
We also faced an approximately $20 million or 2 point ICR headwind when compared to last year from an outsized workers’ comp reserve release in Q2 2024. With the mix of our current book and smaller remaining reserves, we expect fewer major reserve releases moving forward. Taken all together, we’re encouraged by the trends we’re seeing that position us well to return to our targeted ICR range in 2026. Second quarter operating expenses were down 2.2% year over year. We continue to manage expenses tightly as we benefited from further automation and our workforce strategy. While we prudently manage expenses, we continue to reinvest a portion of the savings into our medium term strategic initiatives, driving growth and improving our customer experience while also investing in process efficiencies. Second quarter GAAP earnings per diluted share was $0.77 and our adjusted earnings per diluted share was $1.15.
During the quarter we continued with strong cash generation. We generated $105 million in adjusted EBITDA, representing an adjusted EBITDA margin of 8.5%. Operating activities in the first half generated $170 million in net cash and $136 million in free cash flow. Our first half 2025 free cash flow conversion ratio was 51% and in line with our 2025 plan. As we look over the medium term, our business will benefit from operating leverage as earnings accelerate through revenue growth and our ICR returns to our targeted range. We expect our free cash flow conversion rate to improve to our 60% to 65% target. Now, turning to capital actions in the quarter, we paid a $0.275 dividend per share, representing a 10% increase year over year.
In total, we’ve deployed just over $117 million to shareholders through the first half, or 87% of free cash flow ahead of our annual 75% target. Earlier in July we did repay our outstanding balance of $90 million on our credit line, getting us closer to our targeted leverage ratio of 1.5 to 2 times adjusted EBITDA. Our capital return priorities for 2025 remain consistent. We aim to deliver shareholder value through continued investment in our value creation initiatives, funding dividends and share buybacks and maintaining a suitable operating liquidity buffer. Turning to the 2025 outlook based on second quarter performance, the full year guidance remains unchanged and earnings are currently tracking modestly above the midpoint of the projected range. As a reminder for 2025 we expect total revenues to be in the range of $4.95 billion to $5.14 billion.
We expect professional services revenue to range from $700 million to $730 million, our insurance cost ratio to be in the range of 90% to 92% and our adjusted EBITDA margin to be from just under 7% to approximately 8.5%. Finally, we expect GAAP earnings per diluted share to be in the range of $1.90 to $3.40 and adjusted earnings per diluted share to be $3.25 to $4.75. In conclusion, we had a good second quarter. We had two abnormal and largely offsetting impacts to earnings: strong interest revenue and older health claims. Setting these items aside, we’re confident that our earnings are tracking modestly above the midpoint of our range. We are advancing initiatives designed to enhance our offerings, all aimed at driving profitable growth, efficiencies, and returning us to our targeted insurance cost ratio range by 2026.
We are well positioned for the second half of the year, and I’m proud of the continued execution by our dedicated colleagues. With that, I’ll pass the call to the operator for Q&A.
Operator: We will now begin the question and answer session. To ask a question, you may press Star then one on your telephone keypad. If you are using a speakerphone, please pick up your handset before pressing the keys. If at any time your question has been addressed and you would like to withdraw your question, please press Star then two. At this time, we will pause momentarily to assemble our roster. Our first question comes from Jared Levine with TD Cowen. Please go ahead.
Mike Simonds, President and CEO, TriNet Group Inc.: Thank you. I guess to start here, can you discuss how top of funnel activity and pace of prospective client decision making has trended since 1Q, including your thoughts on relative impacts from the macro uncertainty versus.
Alex Bauer, Head of Investor Relations, TriNet Group Inc.: The healthcare cost inflation?
Mike Simonds, President and CEO, TriNet Group Inc.: Good morning, Jared. Thanks for the question. I appreciate it. I do think both of those factors were in play here in the first half. In terms of at new sales, we look at that funnel as you would with various stages, and we’ve seen when it gets to the point of more sort of brass tacks, detailed proposal and it’s in the hands of the client, that’s where we’ve seen a lengthening in that sales cycle year over year. That’s been certainly a contributor to it. The second piece is, as you mentioned, the professional and healthy pricing, and in general, I would just make sure that everybody realizes while we certainly have increased the outlooks and the applications out to our pricing processes, we are still finding ourselves very much in the market. We’re not putting prices out there that are terribly different than competition.
It’s simply the year over year compare, the orientation that we had around healthcare fee increases and relative to competition. It’s just materially changed as we look forward. I think this is really the important part at the funnel and how pricing is showing up relative to competition. As we look at the capabilities that are now going into the market through the fall selling season, we’re really encouraged that we’re going to start to see an improvement in the year over year variances on the new business front.
Kelly Tuminelli, CFO, TriNet Group Inc.: Great.
Mike Simonds, President and CEO, TriNet Group Inc.: In terms of sales headcount, good to hear that you’ve seen some traction in terms of retention on the tenured reps here. I guess how is sales headcount trending through 2Q here and are you still targeting modest growth for the year? Great question and really important when you think about the productivity of our reps at 24 and really at 36 months, it’s materially different and the team’s done a great job putting changes in place. We’ve seen really good retention of those really valuable reps. That’s ultimately in the short to midterm what’s going to drive capacity for us. I really don’t have capacity concerns here as we go into the important second half selling season. We did use the tail of last year and the first half of this year to retool how we go about our profiling, recruiting, and training program.
We’ve rolled out new approaches to that. We are now ramping up our new rep hiring. I think we have a lot more confidence that those investments we’re making in new talent coming into the business today, we’ll see many more of them reach that 36 month mark. In aggregate, in absolute numbers, we’ve got a little bit fewer reps on the street today than we had a year ago. However, the capacity is in a very good place because of the retention of senior reps and I am very confident about the quality of the class that’s coming on here and it’s going to help us through the 2026 and 2027 years. Great. Thank you.
Alex Bauer, Head of Investor Relations, TriNet Group Inc.: Thanks Jared.
Operator: Our next question comes from Andrew Nicholas with William Blair. Please go ahead.
Mike Simonds, President and CEO, TriNet Group Inc.: Thank you for taking my questions. Mike, you just alluded to it.
Alex Bauer, Head of Investor Relations, TriNet Group Inc.: little bit in the answer to your first question, but just on the competitive environment, it sounds like you’re relatively close to where others are. From a pricing perspective, are you seeing any actions or postures from competitors that are different versus last year in terms of how aggressive they are on price or what they’re doing to kind of win deals relative to what you’ve seen in the past?
Mike Simonds, President and CEO, TriNet Group Inc.: Good morning, Andrew. Thanks for the question. When you have the macro that we’ve got with a little bit more uncertainty in it in terms of the economic outlook, certainly it’s going to be a competitive market out there as people do compete for the business that does make decisions in the period. I wouldn’t say anything abnormal, and I do think it’s worth noting.
Alex Bauer, Head of Investor Relations, TriNet Group Inc.: Right.
Mike Simonds, President and CEO, TriNet Group Inc.: TriNet’s a little bit different from most scaled PEOs in that we’ve invested pretty significantly in our insurance services group, added a good amount of talent, and improved our discipline in the application of our improved forecasting. We do that on a quarterly basis. We’ve talked about that before, but I think it’s an important point. It certainly means that there’s a cohort of customers that we’re taking our very most up-to-date point of view on healthcare and applying that through our feet at renewal time each quarter. We also do that with new business. Every 90 days we’re adjusting our new business pricing and outlook, and when you’re in an accelerated cost environment, I think TriNet is going to get there a little quicker in terms of adequately pricing our health plan fees.
I think as we’re now starting to see more stability, albeit at a heightened level of cost inflation, we sort of see the market coming in closer to where we’re seeing things on a go-forward basis. I think it’s actually a pretty constructive environment here as we’re heading into the second half of 2026.
Alex Bauer, Head of Investor Relations, TriNet Group Inc.: Great, that’s helpful. Kelly, if you could speak a little bit more to healthcare trends in the quarter. I heard you on, I think it was prior period development and that being a little bit one time.
Mike Simonds, President and CEO, TriNet Group Inc.: If you could speak to kind.
Alex Bauer, Head of Investor Relations, TriNet Group Inc.: Of what you’re seeing under the hood there in a little bit more detail, that’d be helpful. Thank you.
Yeah, no problem at all, Andrew. You know what I would say in general on healthcare, we’re seeing some of the same similar trends. From a large, complex claim perspective, we did see a slight anomaly in the quarter, mainly with one specific carrier. As I look at those, and we’ve had discussions actually with our other carriers as well, we don’t really see a backlog and see that largely as one time. Similar trends, pharma and kind of the mid teens inflation rate and medical, high single digit, but right in line with our expectation other than the one time claims.
Understood, thank you.
Operator: Our next question comes from Kyle Peterson with Needham. Please go ahead.
Alex Bauer, Head of Investor Relations, TriNet Group Inc.: Great morning. Thanks for taking the questions. Wanted to start out on kind of where client hiring and CIE trended throughout the quarter. It does sound like it came in a little better than you guys were originally budgeting for, which is great. I guess was the improvement fairly linear and was May better than April and June better than May or was there a standout month in there in particular? I guess that’s my main question. Was the trajectory there and if it was smooth or a little lumpier.
Great, Kyle, happy to answer that question. When we looked at CIE, we had a similar question, honestly because we were hearing different sound bites as people were looking at labor data, et cetera. For us it was pretty linear. We really saw just steady CIE throughout the quarter. The bright spots were really tech, particularly in software as well as tech consulting, financial services, really more family office type things, and in nonprofit, both in schools and social advocacy organizations. Generally, we just saw steady at a couple hundred favorable to what our original expectations were.
Okay, that is really helpful and great to hear. I guess in the follow up on the professional services revenue, I know there’s a lot of moving pieces there, but I guess could you quantify the impact of, you know, some of the, whether it’s the ASO transition and or like the Claris divestiture. Just want to see if you guys have like an, or like an apples to apples, at least for the Claris impact, just so we can kind of see what the organic trend is there.
When I look at professional services revenue year over year, probably the biggest decline in professional services revenue really relates to a client specific level technology fee. Putting that aside, we’re pleased with the ASO conversion. While we’re probably down about $1 million on HRIS in total, the mix is good and the conversion looks like it’s going well. Coming into the year, we really had expected about a $15 to $20 million headwind on ASO and HRIS. I’d really expect that to be probably about $5 million better than what I’d initially expected there. It’s really helping offset some of the volume impacts on PEO overall.
Okay, that’s good to hear.
To answer your question specifically, I think we’re down about 2, you know, really no Claris revenue now, whereas we had about $2 million the same quarter last year.
Okay. Thanks for the clarification and taking my questions next quarter. Thanks, Kyle.
Operator: Again, if you have a question, please press star then one. Our next question comes from Kevin Levy with UBS. Please go ahead.
Mike Simonds, President and CEO, TriNet Group Inc.: Great. Thanks so much, and congratulations.
Alex Bauer, Head of Investor Relations, TriNet Group Inc.: Navigating a tough environment for sure.
Mike Simonds, President and CEO, TriNet Group Inc.: I guess I don’t know if that’s Kelly or Mike, but you reaffirmed the guidance again after kind of two beats. Is that just conservatism or maybe a little bit of shift in the back half of the year? How are you thinking about that? If it is a little bit of shift, can you.
Alex Bauer, Head of Investor Relations, TriNet Group Inc.: Dimensionalize where that sits primarily?
Kelly Tuminelli, CFO, TriNet Group Inc.: Great.
Kevin, you know, we always have a level of seasonality within our business and so pleased with the results so far. They’re just really, you know, we see ourselves landing within the range overall and right now we’re tracking to modestly above the midpoint. As I’m looking at the back half of the year, obviously we expect a level of seasonality associated with the insurance cost ratio, but that’s really it. I’m pleased with the expense efficiencies and I think we’re on track.
Alex Bauer, Head of Investor Relations, TriNet Group Inc.: Great.
Mike Simonds, President and CEO, TriNet Group Inc.: There are just delayed claims from 2024. I mean, I don’t typically remember something that far back. Can you help us maybe dimensionalize that?
Alex Bauer, Head of Investor Relations, TriNet Group Inc.: A little bit what it was.
Mike Simonds, President and CEO, TriNet Group Inc.: Can you way to think about how much impact the claims were in the quarter versus maybe the interest income versus the professional fees, just to get a sense of, you know, the absolute dollars.
Alex Bauer, Head of Investor Relations, TriNet Group Inc.: Against those three things.
Yeah, happy to talk about it. You know, when I think about the lag claims, just to kind of reiterate the prior question, or prior caller question, we always have some older claims from 2024. Our lag factors do multi-year look back and evaluate that these were just outsized with one specific carrier. Some other complex claims that we normally don’t see in there. Definitely outsized for the quarter. It by and large offset the favorability in interest income, so within a couple million dollars of the higher claims offsetting the higher interest income. We view those both as pretty much anomalous. From a professional services revenue perspective, we were right on track with our expectations.
I know we were a little bit above where I saw analysts consensus models for PSR, but in terms of the range that we gave, $700 million to $730 million, we see ourselves kind of landing somewhere in the middle there.
Great, thank you.
Operator: Our next question comes from David Grossman with Stifel. Please go ahead.
Alex Bauer, Head of Investor Relations, TriNet Group Inc.: Good morning. Thank you. I’m wondering because last year was somewhat of an unusual year and a lot of transitions in the business, can you review for us just some of the major comparison dynamics that we should think about as we go into the back half of the year, whether it be sales growth, WSE growth, margin dynamics, et cetera.
Yeah, David, why don’t I take that and then maybe Mike can come in over the top with anything I might miss here. As we’re thinking about it being a transition year, our original forecast did assume WSE are down. As we were looking at the size of the health plan increases we had to put forward, we expected to have a level of attrition better than historical average, but still a couple points higher than what was really a record year from a retention perspective. From a sales perspective, we also expected that to be a little bit down because we had a little more, I’d say, realistic view on where health plan increases were going to be and what we had to do there from a new pricing perspective.
As I think about it, you know, from a worksite employee perspective, we were expecting maybe slightly better and frankly that’s what we’re seeing. Still, though, our forecast assumes low single digit. We did, you know, when we went into the year, I think I just mentioned we were expecting HRAs and ASO to be about a $15 to $20 million headwind on professional services revenue. That’s probably looking more like, you know, $10, $10 to $15 at this point in time and other changes. From an expense perspective, we had indicated that expenses would be lower year over year and we’re kind of outpacing the pace of automation and just efficiency overall. Interest income, that’s one I probably didn’t touch on. We’d expected rates to be maybe a little bit lower than they’re really trending right now and really hadn’t anticipated the accrued interest related to certain tax payments.
That won’t be as much of a headwind year over year either. Anything you want to add?
Mike Simonds, President and CEO, TriNet Group Inc.: No, I think you covered it well. I think the key point being the execution is there and it’s encouraging. It takes a little bit of time, but it’s coming through. The key quality metrics we talked a little bit about in the opening, seeing the health plan fee increases come through.
Alex Bauer, Head of Investor Relations, TriNet Group Inc.: On a per member basis, we finally.
Mike Simonds, President and CEO, TriNet Group Inc.: Caught that cost trend. Outside of the seasonality that Kelly talked about, we’re sort of right on track to head back into that historical range next year. Certainly the WSE is down. I don’t expect further degradation in terms of the year over year compare. Recall we’re going into our 10/1s and 1/1 renewals. That’s about 70% of our revenue. We’re going to renew in the second half of the year. We had really put a more disciplined process in place with 10/1/24.
Alex Bauer, Head of Investor Relations, TriNet Group Inc.: That was our first quarter.
Mike Simonds, President and CEO, TriNet Group Inc.: We’re kind of second time through there, and I think that bodes well in terms of striking that good balance of retention and staying ahead of that cost trend. The quality underneath the volume I’m encouraged on as we go through the second quarter, and I think you’ll see that in the year over year compares.
Alex Bauer, Head of Investor Relations, TriNet Group Inc.: Mike, you touched upon this in your prepared remarks just in terms of your progress in the broker channel. I think you were, if I heard you right, distinguishing between national and local brokers. Do you want to talk a little bit about at least what your expectations are in the back half of the year based on what you’re seeing? Is this really more of a 2026 dynamic where you see kind of a bigger contribution per channel, or is it realistic to expect that we could see some momentum in that channel in the back half of the year during obviously your biggest selling season?
Mike Simonds, President and CEO, TriNet Group Inc.: Yeah, absolutely. Expect it’ll be additive here, David, in the second half of the year. We’ve put several national agreements in place. Those are starting to build real traction. You put those agreements in place, and I think it’s important just to note that it’s both new sales and retention. We’re looking to build high quality, sticky customer base over time with distributors that really understand our value proposition and the quality that we’re trying to deliver. I think in particular we’re seeing it in the growth and proposals that we’re producing for that channel that’s already moving up on the local level. That’s where we start to see the number of brokers using our platform has started to increase. We’re in the mid single digits in year over year increase on that front already.
That’s quite encouraging, I think, in terms of it playing all the way through to WSE and professional services revenue growth. Certainly, that’s going to be tail end of the year, and the January effect is where you really start to see those closed business coming through in the financials. I’d expect that momentum starts to build here actually in the second half of the year.
Alex Bauer, Head of Investor Relations, TriNet Group Inc.: Got it. Lastly, I think there’s already been some questions on the CIE growth. I’m just trying to recall, I think, sorry, I got cut off the call for a few minutes, so maybe I missed this, but it sounds like the second quarter seasonality is related to summer hiring. Did I hear that correctly? If so, what exactly can we, you know, conclusions can we draw from you being slightly ahead of plan? I think probably contrary to some of the other small business employment trends that are out in the marketplace that we’ve seen, or maybe the bar was really low. It could be that as well. Just trying to better understand whether there’s much to read into the fact that CIE was slightly better.
I know, and also maybe in the context of that response, maybe you could talk a little bit whether or not it’s unique to TriNet, you’re over indexed obviously to Bay Area hiring in the tech sector. Maybe that just got less worse. Just again trying to understand that dynamic.
Yeah, David, it’s a great question. As we’re looking at, you know, kind of peeling apart the underlying data associated with CIE, you’re right. From the standpoint of it, it is a low compare. It’s about the CIE was favorable to our expectations by a couple hundred, so we’re not talking a huge number. That’s why our outlook is still low single digit. What we saw wasn’t as much of seasonal hiring, but really just fewer layoffs. As we look at kind of the pieces of who’s hiring and who’s reducing, we’re seeing a trend of kind of fewer people being let go, which I think is a positive trend overall. We did see that sort of steady through April, May, and June. Regarding verticals, both financial services and tech were pretty strong on a % basis.
Also nonprofit, but it is a smaller vertical for us, so it didn’t have as much of an impact on the total number from a CIE perspective. The hiring in Main Street, it was a little lower than that, but still.
Kelly Tuminelli, CFO, TriNet Group Inc.: It’s a little bit bigger vertical.
It made up more. I would say probably half the hiring in Main Street was more seasonally related with things like hospitality.
Alex Bauer, Head of Investor Relations, TriNet Group Inc.: I’m sorry, I had one other thing I just wanted to ask. Are the outsized larger claims related to the Change Healthcare situation where processing was just getting caught up to where we should be and some older claims are coming in, or because I know you said it was related to one carrier? Just wondering if that’s it or whether it’s just totally unrelated.
Yeah, you know, David, we sort of had that hypothesis as we were looking into it as well, but we really haven’t found any evidence to indicate that. We did want to make sure that we spent the requisite amount of time with each of our carriers to really kick the tires around backlogs and processing times and any differences that we needed to pick up on. Since it was really isolated to one of our carriers, I feel pretty good about, you know, it is an anomaly in the quarter. For the most part, it was about.
Kelly Tuminelli, CFO, TriNet Group Inc.: A third larger than we would normally.
See, which is definitely outsized from what we would see in any month.
Alex Bauer, Head of Investor Relations, TriNet Group Inc.: Got it. All right, great. Thanks very much. Good luck in the second half.
Kelly Tuminelli, CFO, TriNet Group Inc.: Great.
Thanks, David.
Operator: This concludes our question and answer session. I would like to turn the conference back over to Mike Simonds for any closing remarks.
Mike Simonds, President and CEO, TriNet Group Inc.: Thanks, Megan. Thanks, everyone, for joining. Encouraged by the results here at the midpoint. Hopefully you pick up a sense of confidence from us in the building momentum in the business. We very much look forward to keeping you posted in the coming quarters. Megan, with that, you can conclude the call.
Operator: The conference has now concluded. Thank you for attending today’s presentation. You may now disconnect.
This article was generated with the support of AI and reviewed by an editor. For more information see our T&C.
