Reliance Inc. at Jefferies Conference: Strategic Growth and Market Trends

Published 03/09/2025, 22:06
Reliance Inc. at Jefferies Conference: Strategic Growth and Market Trends

On Wednesday, 03 September 2025, Reliance Inc. (NYSE:RS) presented at the Jefferies Mining and Industrials Conference 2025, outlining their strategic growth initiatives and market challenges. The company emphasized its robust cash flow, consistent dividends, and its focus on acquisitions, while acknowledging market uncertainties due to trade policies.

Key Takeaways

  • Reliance Inc. highlighted its diversified business model and decentralized operations.
  • The company has completed 76 acquisitions since its IPO in 1994, focusing on family-owned businesses.
  • Current market dynamics show steady demand in non-residential construction, particularly data centers.
  • Tariffs support higher pricing levels, benefiting domestic mills, but create market uncertainties.
  • Reliance remains committed to increasing dividends and share repurchases.

Financial Results

  • Reliance Inc. reported strong cash flow generation and consistent dividend payments.
  • The company has invested 1.8 billion dollars in capital expenditures over the last five years, with more than half allocated to growth.
  • Reliance has repurchased approximately 3.2 billion dollars of its shares in the past five years.

Operational Updates

  • The company serves over 125,000 customers with more than 100,000 metal products.
  • Operating in a decentralized manner, Reliance values local relationships and customer proximity.
  • Approximately 50% of orders include value-added processing, boosting gross profit margins to 29-31%.

Future Outlook

  • Demand remains steady, with strong performance in data centers and non-residential construction.
  • The automotive sector shows stable demand, supported by investments in processing facilities.
  • Reshoring trends are evident, with manufacturing moving back to the U.S. from Southeast Asia.
  • The aerospace sector is recovering, with inventories being reduced.

Q&A Highlights

  • CEO Carla Lewis addressed the impact of tariffs, noting benefits for domestic mills but also expressing concerns over market balance.
  • The company’s M&A strategy focuses on acquiring well-run, accretive companies, often family-owned.
  • Reliance aims to maintain flexibility in capital allocation, balancing investments in growth and shareholder returns.

For further details, readers are encouraged to refer to the full transcript of the conference call.

Full transcript - Jefferies Mining and Industrials Conference 2025:

Albert Rialini, Equity Research Team, Jefferies: Afternoon, everybody. My name’s Albert Rialini. I work on the Jefferies Equity Research Team covering the metals and mining sector. Today, we have the pleasure of being joined by Reliance Inc. We have CEO, Carla Lewis and COO, Steven Koch.

The format today is we’re going open up with a brief presentation from Carla on Reliance and then we’ll open it up to Q and A in the room.

Carla Lewis, CEO, Reliance Inc.: Alright. Thank you. Thanks, Albert and thanks to Jefferies for having us here. Tell you a little bit about our company. So at Reliance, we’re a metal service center company, so primarily processing and distribution of of metals.

We were founded in Los Angeles in 1939. So we’ve been around over eighty five years. We currently have, about three twenty locations, predominantly in The US, North America, but we do have some international locations. We’ve grown quite a bit over the years with a focus on being diversified, selling over 100,000 metal products to over 125,000 customers. We kind of operate ourselves, and I’ll talk a little more about this as we go along, in a decentralized manner, and a lot through acquisitions.

So we do keep the brand names in place and so a lot of people don’t know who Reliance is. They know our From a market standpoint, they know more who are, they know more who our individual companies are that they’re buying from every day. We think there’s value in the companies we acquire. And we talk about our differentiated approach, we think, a little different than some of the other larger service center companies. As I mentioned, we really focus on diversification.

I think we have, you know, probably the broadest product diversification. Also, we sell into most end markets. Most things, you know, use metals, have metals some part of their component and also look for that geographic, diversification. I mentioned our decentralized, operating model. We still think that we’re our industry, it’s more of a local business, relationships matter.

We try to be close to our customers and put the decision making close to the customers. We think we can service them better and also drive our profitability a little more that way. We talk about as needed inventory, so a lot of our customers looking for small quantities quickly. We try to educate our salespeople to understand the value they’re providing to their customers, not take advantage from our customers, but make sure we’re charging for that and monitor our pricing and gross profit margins very closely. We generally buy in the spot, sell in the spot.

We have very limited long term contract business in the where we’ll do long term multiyear business is primarily in our aerospace where we the producers will lock into, multiyear sell price and so then we can lock into that with our customers. We do have some kind of quarterly pricing agreements with certain portions of our customer base, but the majority is transactional spot pricing. And, we do continue to try to grow organically. I think we’ve been the lead in dollars spent, with our capital expenditure budget for quite a few years now, when we’re identifying our our people in the field are identifying opportunities for us to do more for our customers, and we’ve got the ability and the desire to, to invest in that. I talked about our diversification.

So if you look at at these graphs, it kind of shows our end market, So general manufacturing, non res construction, and then transportation are three kind of major end markets, that we service with a lot of diversity selling into a lot of different customers and end markets within that, again, out by region. Commodity, we’re a little over half, carbon steel and then about 15% stainless and 15% aluminum. We have toll processing as part of our business. In that business, we’re it’s only 4% of our sales dollars, but we’re actually, processing about 6,000,000 tons of metal a year, but we don’t take ownership of the metal. We’re the primarily the mill owns the metal, and then we don’t take on the price risk for that metal, typically selling into auto and appliance from our toll processing business.

And then to the right, the byproduct, you can see that, we certainly do flat rolled in there, but carbon steel structural tubing, and plate are some of our biggest commodity items. If we move, we also, with our model, we really do focus a lot on smaller customers with small order sizes, which we think is possible because of our decentralized model. So $15,000,000,000 in revenue, dollars 3,000 average order size. We’re doing a lot of transactions at our locations every day. 40% of those orders customer calls today, we deliver tomorrow.

About we’ve grown to about 50% of our orders today have some form of value added processing performed. With that increased, value added processing that we’re performing, historically, we would do about 40% of our orders, but our gross profit margins were kind of in the 25% to 27%, gross profit margin range. So we’ve steadily increased that and we think it’s sustainable from doing more value added processing that we’re now in a 29% to 31% gross profit margin range. And then more on the, financial side, our model we think allows us to have very strong and consistent cash flows even in down markets, so, somewhat of a countercyclical cash flow generation. And we’ve, you know, with our increased size, increased earnings, our cash flows have also expanded in recent years.

And on this chart, what we’re showing here is reliance in the orange, our gross profit margin pretty comparable and consistent and at the level of industrial distribution companies. And then, it’s a bit above the service center peers and then the mill, peer group. And then to the right, our EBITDA margin, again towards the top, mill is doing a little better than us in recent years and we’ve actually started to outperform in certain periods the industrial distributors. So kind of the point here, you know, looking at us from a valuation standpoint potentially driving to a multiple closer to the industrial distribution companies. And from an investment standpoint, we like to grow, as I mentioned, kind of a leader on the CapEx side.

You know, since, in the last five years or so, we’ve put about $1,800,000,000 into CapEx, about half of that or more every year is growth related and the majority of that going into value added processing equipment, which is allowing us to grow that gross profit margins. Also, pretty acquisitive. We’ve completed since our IPO in 1994, we’ve completed 76 acquisitions. Those are all those companies named on that earlier slide that I showed. And last year in 2024, we acquired four companies.

We’re always looking for good companies that we think are a good fit within Reliance, but we don’t set targets because we don’t wanna do a bad deal. But we think, we only represent, 16% of MSCI shipments today. It’s still a very fragmented industry, so we think there’s still, a lot of opportunity for us to continue to grow through acquisitions as well as organically. And then on a shareholder return perspective, we’ve paid regular quarterly dividends for sixty six years. We don’t have a formal dividend policy, but we want to consistently increase our dividend at a sustainable level.

We’ve never not paid our dividend and we’ve never reduced our dividend. So and we’d like to keep doing that going forward. And then also from a share repurchase standpoint, we opportunistically enter the market and, you know, in the last five years have repurchased about $3,200,000,000 of our shares. And, this just shows our stock price, our trading history for the last thirty one years, which, you know, we’re we’re proud of what we’ve been able to do and, look to continue to do more. So that’s a little bit about Reliance.

Albert Rialini, Equity Research Team, Jefferies: Thank you for that Carla. And if anybody does any questions, feel free to raise your hand. I will come give a mic over to you. But maybe I’ll start it with, just high level on kind of the state of steel demand currently in the it seems many in the market have been waiting a while for rate cuts and maybe some more certainty with policy. But just the state of demand and if possible, if you can maybe quantify what you think is has been I guess more of the driver in terms of the increase in HRC pricing and maybe your realized pricing versus from demand or the benefit of tariffs?

Carla Lewis, CEO, Reliance Inc.: Yes, so I think I wish I had a really good answer to that and knew exactly what was going on. We do from a demand standpoint, I would say overall, we’ve seen over the last year and a half or so fairly steady overall demand levels with a little more strength in some areas than others. We do think that the uncertainty in the market due to the trade policies is holding buyers back. It’s holding back business owners making decisions. We do think once people get a little more certainty and they feel more confident making those investment decisions and also when we get interest rate reductions we think that could spur a little more demand which could should help with the pricing.

But Steve maybe you can talk a little more about demand.

Steven Koch, COO, Reliance Inc.: Sure. For the most part, demand has been steady for the past several quarters and non res has been driving that demand. It wouldn’t be a conference without mentioning data centers. I mean, touch data centers, the construction of them and the infrastructure in and around data centers. And also, we service the health care schools, hospitals, universities, a lot of infrastructure play for bridges, tunnels, airports, rail stations.

So overall, non res has been a bright spot for Reliance over the last several quarters, we look forward to servicing these markets into 2026. General manufacturing, it’s been spotty. There’s been some real strong spots for us, anything defense military related, machine shops or shipbuilding or submarines, etcetera. I mean, there’s going to be a build up, a rebuilding of our stockpiles as far as our defense business for many, many years to come. I think we’re positioned well to service those sectors.

And then probably agriculture has been something that’s been kind of going along the bottom for the last several quarters. We’re looking forward to hopefully some change in that sector in 2026. We service auto from the toll processing point of view. We don’t sell the OEMs directly, but we work with all of them and we’re doing processing, whether it’s aluminum or steel, and we’re located near a lot of their plants and delivering just in time for them. We’ve seen steady demand.

And we look forward to we’ve invested in our facilities to take care of the automotive sector, and we’re positive regarding that. Any other industries? Aerospace from a commercial point of view. There’s been a lot of negative news in the past several quarters, but we’ve actually heard some inventories being burned off and some positive anecdotal stories from some of the large Airbus and Boeing. We’re positive regarding that.

And defense and space has been a bright spot for us.

Albert Rialini, Equity Research Team, Jefferies: Okay. Thank you for that. Yeah, on data center, I was at the Atlanta Steel Conference last week and that was a pretty significant takeaway of mine. It’s, you know, that’s I think been, you know, making up for some maybe some lost demand and with the current interest rate environment. But maybe on reshoring, I think that was another trend that was discussed a lot last week.

So anything you’re seeing there, evidence of that actually materializing?

Carla Lewis, CEO, Reliance Inc.: Yeah so from a reshoring standpoint, actually from the first Trump administration, we did see some business, some manufacturing move back to The US from mainly Southeast Asia. Not in a big way, but there were definite some of our customers started making components for their customers here as opposed to it being done overseas. So there was already some momentum that discussions continued obviously coming out of COVID and bringing your supply chains closer. A lot of investment and planned investment in Mexico by a lot of our customers. And so we think that’s real and it had started.

Now, especially the beginning of this year, we heard from almost all of our businesses that their customers were talking to them much more about bringing their supply chains, bringing production back to The U. S, potentially Mexico. I don’t think anyone thought that the uncertainty with Canada and Mexico would last as long as it has. So I think that’s holding back a lot of our customers from actually kicking off their investments, whether it ends up being in The U. S.

Or Mexico until they feel there’s a little more certainty there. But definitely, a lot of people talking about it and I think Steve can share some examples of of, you know, real investment that we’ve already seen.

Steven Koch, COO, Reliance Inc.: Yeah. So we’ve seen obviously a lot of reinvestments in the chip industry down in Texas and Arizona. Automotive, we’ve seen some platforms move from Mexico and Canada to The United States. They’re adding shifts automotive is adding shifts to a lot of their plants. And also we’ve seen a lot of pharmaceutical reshoring where research and development and actually production of drugs being moved to The United States for security purposes and other purposes.

Albert Rialini, Equity Research Team, Jefferies: So Karl, you mentioned the uncertainty with tariffs, especially Canada and Mexico. I think on primary steelmaking, it’s kind of easy to maybe understand how tariffs would benefit a primary steelmaker here in The U. S. But I guess maybe if you could walk through how tariffs benefit or maybe they don’t benefit your business? And just how do you yeah, the impact there?

Carla Lewis, CEO, Reliance Inc.: I mean, generally a better balance between supply and demand is supportive of higher pricing levels and with less import and we’ve seen this since 2018 with less imported material coming in, it’s given the domestic mills the opportunity to increase prices. Generally, you know, we’re able to pass those higher prices on to our customers. Obviously, we have to be fair, to our customers when we’re doing that, but they understand the model and so it gives us higher prices, higher earnings dollars. So, we think that overall for the industry, tariffs in the past have been, supportive to our industry. Also I think you know Reliance, we have a long history of buying domestic product.

Over 95% of what we buy, we buy from The US producers, so we have strong positions with them. So we have access to the metal and already have, you know, those relationships built so customers know they can come to us. You know, I think there has been, some shifting. There are some, you know, service centers out there whose model historically has been to bring in a lot of import material and even some customers who would bring import in direct and they’ve had to find a new source for that. We’ve seen our market share, our shipments increasing and outpacing the industry shipment levels.

We think some of that’s part of the reason and the domestic mills who we’re very close with are also picking up some of that share from import and we like to partner with them and grow with them. So those are some of the positives that we look at.

Albert Rialini, Equity Research Team, Jefferies: Okay. And then maybe just a quick follow-up there. So on the primary steelmaking side, I think some of the major producers, there’s a bit of an offsetting negative with Canada and Mexico being involved, given some of them have operations there, have invested there, given kind of the intertwining of the North American industry since, I think it was 2020 when they were originally given exemption. So anything to call out there in terms of your business dealings in Canada and Mexico? I’m not sure if you touched on maybe how much of your earnings are derived from sales there or?

Carla Lewis, CEO, Reliance Inc.: Yeah so for us it’s pretty limited. In Mexico we have some toll processing operations there and their business has held up. It’s actually doing really well, primarily automotive tolling. And we have lot of customers, as I mentioned earlier, with operations down there. We haven’t seen a significant impact and it’s still a fairly small part of our business, I think more of it was planning for the future.

We do have some operations in Canada, again, a fairly small footprint. We used to supply them from kind of one of our hub locations in The US, and so they’ve had to they’re bringing in less of that metal and having to find different supply sources. But, you know, again, for for us directly, you know, it’s been pretty limited. Understand a lot of other supply chains are a little more disrupted, but I don’t want to speak for any of the producers.

Albert Rialini, Equity Research Team, Jefferies: If anyone in the room has a question, feel free to just raise your hand. But I guess, maybe moving more towards the longer term impact of tariffs. So I think in 2018 when Trump first enacted them, I think the response from the primary steelmaking industry was to invest in new capacity. And you’re starting to see that capacity come online this year, next year. And I think it maybe has painted a little bit of an unfavorable kind of market balance unless you do have tariffs on.

So just curious, was there a similar response from the service center side of things in 2018? Was there a lot of investment in new capacity in the industry or?

Carla Lewis, CEO, Reliance Inc.: No. I mean, I think people are in the service industry you know always looking for growth opportunities and

Albert Rialini, Equity Research Team, Jefferies: you know

Carla Lewis, CEO, Reliance Inc.: we’ve done a few greenfields but I wouldn’t say that was you know tariff related. Maybe people were more profitable and so they had higher cash flow to be able to invest a little more in growth. But in our growth and investments at the service center level, If we do a greenfield today it might cost 30,000,000 to $40,000,000 The mills, the producers, they’re going billions of dollars. So we can do a lot of incremental growth without the type of capacity increase that you see at the producer level.

Albert Rialini, Equity Research Team, Jefferies: Okay. And I think a follow-up to that would be, so I think this time around and it’s definitely a takeaway from last week, that you won’t kind of see that same response from the domestic producers, obviously, given the supply outlook. And I think another reason is because you’re starting to see how competent foreign producers are going to get on tariffed access to The US markets with Nippon’s purchase of U. S. Steel and then Hyundai’s commitment to the new, I think it is 6,500,000,000.0 tons billion dollar for 3,500,000, maybe, tons into the 2030s.

So I guess how does investment like that from foreign producers and more and more I guess domestic capacity, how would that impact you guys in the longer term? And I guess your margins.

Carla Lewis, CEO, Reliance Inc.: Yeah, I guess be careful here. Again as I said earlier, kind of the we like a good supply demand balance. It’s better for all of us. And as you mentioned there has been domestic mills have increased their capacity here in the last few years. That’s coming online.

And I guess from our space timing works with the import restrictions that that new domestic capacity could replace the metal that was coming in from foreign sources and that would keep us in better balance. I think we’re good. I don’t think we need more investment in U. S. Capacity in the steel space, at least not in the near term.

But I don’t get to make those decisions, but I probably would have made different decisions.

Albert Rialini, Equity Research Team, Jefferies: And then just last one on tariffs from me. If maybe you could just talk about how the impact on the aluminum side has been, if if really any different. I know, obviously, we produce much more steel here in The US than we do primary aluminum and if that’s been kind of a different impact with tariffs.

Steven Koch, COO, Reliance Inc.: Yeah, mean the tariffs hit the Midwest premium pretty hard, pretty quickly. So, you know, we’ve been, you know, paying the mill increases and trying to pass it through, but we’re trying to also work with our customers and make sure that there’s not demand destruction and work with them through their challenges. And we’re in it for the long run. And we certainly support U. S.

Manufacturing, but we also support our customer base.

Albert Rialini, Equity Research Team, Jefferies: Okay. So I guess maybe diving more into some company specifics. Obviously, M and A has been kind of part of your DNA over the past few decades. I think I’ve read over 75 acquisitions. I guess what’s your kind of approach there?

I mean how do you look at kind of market valuations currently? Do you I is, guess, the period now, just given the elevated volatility, I guess, less favorable for M and A activity in your space?

Carla Lewis, CEO, Reliance Inc.: Yes. So Reliance, we have grown quite a bit over the years, especially in our earlier years when we were building out our footprint. Our approach on acquisitions is we like to buy good, well run companies, strong management teams, immediately accretive to earnings. And a lot of times and just with the complexion of our industry it’s a lot of like family owned businesses, maybe single to a few locations. And their model’s a little more like ours where it’s really locally focused, customer service, next day delivery and those have been kind of the best additions, to our portfolio.

We have done three larger acquisitions, you know, back in 02/2006, Earl M. Jorgensen, they were a public company at the time, about a billion dollar, transaction. Then the P and A group that had public debt that was kind of a conglomerate of of some different metals companies and, again, about a billion and a half. And then our largest acquisition 13 was Metals USA at about $2,000,000,000 enterprise value, which had also been a roll up that had gone public. So those are good acquisitions for us.

Timing wasn’t always great, especially on our 2008 acquisition. But they were good long term investments that we’ve been really happy with. But then we buy, as I said, a lot of these family owned companies. And the approach is in our decentralized entrepreneurial model to let them continue to generally operate the way they have under their brand. We paid a premium because they were a good company so we want them to continue that.

But we think we can bring resources whether through capital or people or just market knowledge to help them get better. We’ve had a pretty consistent valuation methodology over the years. We try to and especially today, a lot of these companies when we’re looking at them to acquire them, we understand metal prices go up and down, we understand end markets are cyclical and generally we probably have a business that sells similar products into similar end markets so we know what the cycles were. So we look at their historical numbers, we really don’t look at projections, and we try to say you know what do we think a normalized level of earnings would be for this company going forward? We buy them for the long term, we’re not looking to strip them and flip them, we want them to be part of the family going forward and we don’t value any synergies into that number, we think those belong to us.

So we come up with that normalized EBITDA number and then apply a multiple to that and then hope that the seller agrees with us that that’s a fair number, you know, for them. I think from where our you know, we are seeing typically what we’ve seen over the years is when there’s uncertainty or an unfavorable market, the sellers kind of hold back because they think they’re going to get paid a lower price for their business. And then when there’s more confidence, a little more certainty, we see more people come to the market. We try to explain that with the way we value, we’re not taking advantage of market cycles, but that’s kind of the general psyche I think. So we did see a little pullback in opportunities I think going into the election last fall that lasted through the beginning of this year.

But we’ve seen a lot more teasers and just more companies that we’re aware of have come to market in the second quarter. So there’s activity out there. We will look at it and hopefully find some good companies that fit and execute. Valuations, there was, in our view, a big disconnect, coming out of like ’twenty one, ’twenty two, ’twenty three. We thought we saw, you know, expectations become more aligned with the way we look at things.

And as I mentioned, we were able to complete four acquisitions last year. Right now we anticipate more reasonable expectations, although I think there was and hopefully this wasn’t you, Rick, we saw one, recently where we like the business, but we don’t know why someone was willing to pay, you know, the multiple they’re paying for that company and, we said good for the sellers. So but we think that we’ll continue to see activity. Thank

Albert Rialini, Equity Research Team, Jefferies: you for the detail there. You touched on the capital return policy. Just so I heard it correctly, so it’s a fixed dividend or was that right there?

Carla Lewis, CEO, Reliance Inc.: So it’s a quarterly dividend and we’ve generally increased it annually.

Albert Rialini, Equity Research Team, Jefferies: Okay. And is the are the buybacks I know they were more than $1,000,000,000 last year are those a cash flow based payout, an earnings based payout, or just kind of based on the cash you have at hand and maybe where you see the market going?

Carla Lewis, CEO, Reliance Inc.: Yeah. It’s really us just opportunistically accessing the market. We don’t have again anything formal. Being in a business where there’s metal price volatility and cyclical end markets, We like to keep flexibility on our balance sheet. We’re opportunistic when we go after acquisitions, our CapEx, what do our customers need from us.

So we want to have that flexibility. But then we also look at share repurchases opportunistically as well. We’ve been fortunate with our good cash flow the last few years that we’ve been able to really execute on all four of those capital allocation buckets. We haven’t had to pull back on any one to do something else, so we haven’t been held back on share repurchases. We’ve just accessed the market in the manner that we felt was best suited to provide value to our shareholders while at the same time not having to limit anything on the acquisition or organic growth side.

Albert Rialini, Equity Research Team, Jefferies: Okay. I think just maybe going maybe a little bit more back to the macro. Just with the current administration, everyone talks about tariffs, especially in this space. But aside from tariffs and the onshoring initiatives, any other, I guess, changes that you’ve seen that have affected your business under the current administration? Like I know on the mining side of things, companies we cover have seen permitting drastically

So I’m just curious, anything else you guys seen under the current administration?

Carla Lewis, CEO, Reliance Inc.: Yeah, and we really try not to get into politics and voice any views. But there has been some rollback of regulation that I think is good for business overall. You know certainly the bonus depreciation that was enacted that’s good for reliance directly from a cash flow perspective but also I think helpful to spur other investments. I would say nothing else too direct for us

Albert Rialini, Equity Research Team, Jefferies: there.

Unidentified speaker: Just for someone who’s really new to your story, could you just walk me through what kind of allowed for your EPS to essentially double over the last five years? And could you parse out, like, say, this amount is from inorganic contribution, certain amount from margin improvement, that sort of thing, just for that historical context?

Carla Lewis, CEO, Reliance Inc.: I’m not going to be able to do that very well for you, sorry. But I mean really we’ve just had a continued focus on growing the business both with organic, inorganic. It’s probably been a little more even. We used to years ago be more heavily weighted towards acquisitions. But it’s been probably a little more even on those two fronts.

We also have just encouraged our businesses to go after a little more market share, making sure it’s good profitable business, don’t go after everything but be a little more aggressive and we set some targets on that. But I think the biggest factor is really just the underlying metal cost. We are significantly impacted by the price of metal on our earnings level. But also since 2018 coming out of COVID, we think structurally metal prices are higher. All of our costs went up at the producer level, the service center level at our customer level.

So I think you know we think it’s a step up in higher pricing model which we’re generating higher earnings dollars, higher cash flow, our investments in value add processing kind of mitigating some of that metal price risk. But I can’t point to one thing or really parse out, but metal prices would probably be the biggest driver. I

Albert Rialini, Equity Research Team, Jefferies: think we’re out of time. I wanted to thank Carl and Steven for a very nice presentation and I’m sure you could follow-up myself or Carl and Steven after. Thank you.

Carla Lewis, CEO, Reliance Inc.: Thank you.

Steven Koch, COO, Reliance Inc.: Thank you.

This article was generated with the support of AI and reviewed by an editor. For more information see our T&C.

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers
© 2007-2025 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.