Earnings call transcript: Primis Financial Q1 2025 misses EPS forecast

Primis Financial Corp (FRST) reported lower-than-expected earnings for the first quarter of 2025, with an earnings per share (EPS) of $0.14, missing the forecast of $0.26. The revenue, however, slightly exceeded expectations at $34.14 million against a forecast of $33.49 million. Following the announcement, Primis Financial’s stock fell by 5.7% in after-hours trading, closing at $8.34, reflecting investor disappointment over the earnings miss. The regional bank, currently valued at $194.32 million, has maintained dividend payments for 14 consecutive years, offering a 4.8% yield. According to InvestingPro analysis, the stock is trading slightly above its Fair Value.

Key Takeaways

• Primis Financial’s Q1 2025 EPS fell short of forecasts by 46%.
• Revenue surpassed expectations by approximately 2%.
• The stock declined by 5.7% in after-hours trading.
• The company aims to improve return on assets and expand mortgage volumes.
• Cost-cutting measures, including technology spend reduction, are underway.

Company Performance

Primis Financial’s overall performance in Q1 2025 was mixed. While the company achieved a pretax net income of $4.5 million and an adjusted pretax net income of $7.5 million, the missed EPS forecast overshadowed these figures. The company’s return on assets (ROA) was 66 basis points, with a net interest margin improvement to 3.15% from 2.90% in the previous quarter. Trading at just 0.55 times book value and down 27.84% year-to-date, the stock has struggled to maintain momentum. InvestingPro subscribers have access to 8 additional key insights about FRST’s financial health and growth prospects through exclusive ProTips.

Financial Highlights

• Revenue: $34.14 million, slightly above the forecast of $33.49 million.
• Earnings per share: $0.14, below the forecast of $0.26.
• Net interest margin: 3.15%, up from 2.90% in the previous quarter.
• Non-interest income: $7.8 million.

Earnings vs. Forecast

Primis Financial’s EPS of $0.14 was 46% below the forecast of $0.26, marking a significant miss. The revenue of $34.14 million exceeded expectations by 2%, providing a slight positive offset. This discrepancy between EPS and revenue performance may indicate higher-than-expected expenses or lower margins.

Market Reaction

Following the earnings announcement, Primis Financial’s stock dropped by 5.7% in after-hours trading, closing at $8.34. The decline reflects investor disappointment with the earnings miss, despite revenue exceeding expectations. The stock’s performance is currently closer to its 52-week low of $7.60, indicating market concerns about the company’s short-term prospects.

Outlook & Guidance

Looking forward, Primis Financial is targeting a 1% ROA by expanding earning assets and mortgage volumes while reducing technology spend. The company anticipates a 5-10 basis points margin expansion in Q2 and 10-15 basis points by year-end. Strategic initiatives include consolidating core processing contracts to achieve cost savings. Despite current challenges, analysts tracked by InvestingPro expect the company to return to profitability this year, with consensus targets ranging from $12.00 to $16.25 per share. Discover comprehensive analysis and detailed metrics in FRST’s Pro Research Report, available exclusively to InvestingPro subscribers.

Executive Commentary

Matt Switzer, CFO, emphasized, "Our whole story is getting to the back half of ’25 and holding the line on expenses." CEO Dennis Semmer added, "The whole goal is to hold OpEx flat and let all of the growth... skip OpEx and get leverage straight to the bottom line." These statements highlight the company’s focus on cost control and operational efficiency to drive future growth.

Risks and Challenges

• Potential for further earnings misses if cost control measures do not yield expected savings.
• Market volatility impacting mortgage volumes.
• Competitive pressure on deposit costs.
• Economic conditions affecting loan demand and interest rates.
• Execution risk related to strategic initiatives and technology spend reduction.

Q&A

During the earnings call, analysts questioned the company’s confidence in mortgage volumes amid the current rate environment. Executives reiterated their belief in strong mortgage volumes and core bank momentum. Concerns were also raised about the potential impact of the Panacea deconsolidation, with management indicating a possible substantial gain from the move.

Full transcript - Primis Financial Corp (FRST) Q1 2025:

Aaron, Conference Operator: Good morning. My name is Aaron, and I will be your conference operator for today. At this time, I would like to welcome everyone to the Premise Financial Corporation First Quarter Earnings Call. All lines have been placed on mute to prevent any background noise. And after the speakers’ remarks, we will have a question and answer session.

With that, I am pleased to turn the call over to Matt Switzer, Chief Financial Officer. Matt, you may now begin.

Dennis Semmer, President and Chief Executive Officer, Premise Financial Corporation: Thank you. Good morning and thank

Matt Switzer, Chief Financial Officer, Premise Financial Corporation: you for joining us. Before we begin, please note that many of our comments during this call will be forward looking statements, which involve risk and uncertainty. There are many factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the anticipated results or other expectations expressed in the forward looking statements. Further discussion of the company’s risk factors and other important information regarding our forward looking statements are part of our recent filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including our recently filed earnings release, which has been posted which has also been posted the Investor Relations section of our corporate site, premisebank.com. We undertake no obligation to update or revise forward looking statements to reflect changed assumptions, the occurrence of unanticipated events or changes to future operating results over time.

In addition, some of the financial measures that we may discuss this morning are non GAAP financial measures. How a non GAAP measure relates to the most comparable GAAP measure will be discussed when the non GAAP measure is used, if not readily apparent. I will now turn the call over to our President and Chief Executive Officer, Dennis Semmer.

Dennis Semmer, President and Chief Executive Officer, Premise Financial Corporation: Thank you, Matt, and thank you to all of you that have joined our conference call this morning. For the quarter, we saw continued we saw the our performance continued track. Excuse me. We for the quarter, we saw our performance continuing to track to the levels that we have expected. We have three in place strategies that would drive much higher ROAs that I’d like to discuss with you.

But before I do that, I want to highlight our core community bank, which I believe is going to be a driver of our growth and results this year. We continue building pipelines of new customers in the current quarter, pushing today’s pipeline to about 3x what it was a year ago. For the first quarter, loans were down a touch because of some delayed closings. But in April, as of this morning, our core bank is up $25,000,000 in loans over the quarter end with plenty of pipeline to keep the numbers moving for the rest of the second quarter. Our loan repricings in the first quarter at the core bank were in the mid-seven percent range and our new deposit accounts opened came in under 2%.

All that and our core bank ended with essentially the same operating expense that they had a year ago, managing tight and letting our improvements have an outsized impact on the bottom line. The momentum at the core bank is encouraging and important when you consider the three in place strategies we have to materially change our results. I’ll give you a quick recap of these and some first quarter results realizing them. First is growth in earning assets back to the level that we experienced before we sold the life premium book. In the second quarter of twenty twenty four, we had about $3,750,000,000 of earning assets, about $350,000,000 higher than where we finished the first quarter of ’twenty five.

Growing earning assets hasn’t been a problem for our bank. And as I look through the rest of this year, we expect about $100,000,000 of growth from the core bank, about $150,000,000 more in warehouse, and about $125,000,000 more from Panacea. None of these strategies need more operating expense to drive this growth. And so over the next few quarters as we reach our target, I expect the spread on this growth to drop straight to pretax and lift the ROA by 20 to 25 basis points over our first quarter numbers. Second is our mortgage division.

We need mortgage to add about 20 basis points to our return on assets compared to last year’s contribution of about five basis points. We’ve been slowly and reliably building our mortgage division since we acquired it in 2022, and I know that that growth sounds insurmountable. But we closed $800,000,000 of loans in 2024, but had about $1,200,000,000 of momentum as we exited the year. Our pretax income divided by closed volume in the first quarter of ’twenty five was 50% higher than all of ’twenty four. And so we already have the higher volumes and higher profitability to carry us very close to that goal.

But to further support that and to highlight the opportunity here, we continue to recruit and brought on some of the best teams in the country. We added the top producing team in Nashville, Tennessee that likely will close somewhere between $150,000,000 and $175,000,000 per year. And we added a family team in Wilmington, North Carolina, all of our military veterans and expect that they will close 175,000,000 to $200,000,000 per year of mostly FHA VA business. We also added teams in Austin, Texas and some other markets. And collectively, the first quarter’s recurring yielded increased production capacity of about $500,000,000 Lastly, we are working and probably most importantly, we are working to simplify and consolidate our core processing contract into one.

We’ve built all the proprietary integrations and customer experiences, and we did so last year so that it would be core agnostic and allow for the kind of move that we need to make. Our customer experience, which is unquestionably leading the market, will not change nor will our unique and reliable method for banking the entire country with proprietary concepts that weed out bad actors and fraudsters. What will change is the bottom line impact and we think materially. We expect to have this announced in the second quarter of ’twenty five with a clear path to what we think or are confident will be a 15 to 18 basis point pickup in our ROA. Before I leave this, I want to make a comment about the importance of the digital platform and why that core consolidation is so important.

I had a question from an investor last night, and I sort of jogged me and sort of made me think about this and put this together. Right now, we fund everything that isn’t the core bank with our digital platform, meaning I’m not stressing my very profitable core community bank with having to stretch to fund national ideas. The digital platform funds all of Panacea’s excess lending, which I believe will be around $500,000,000 by the end of the year. With that funding and at our digital cost of funds, Panacea will earn the bank around a 1.5% after tax ROI. The digital platform funds mortgage warehouse, which will bring in a lot of low cost funds itself.

But with its production, I suppose it will need about 200,000,000 to $250,000,000 throughout the rest of ’twenty five. At the digital cost of funds, warehouse will earn the bank over a 2% return on assets. Collectively, this is an exceptional idea for growth and profitability. It augments and supports the community bank and severely tamps down the idea that we have to win every single loan and every single deposit in the marketplace in our core bank. Over time, that pressure in a community bank leads to poor credit decisions and higher cost of deposits.

The only problem with realizing this dream scenario on almost $1,000,000,000 of balance sheet is the cost to run the digital core is pretty high. Our trailblazing idea was supported by something back then that the cores couldn’t do, but over time, the cores have modernized and now accept outside APIs and integrations. And once we’ve resolved the higher cost of these two cores, this safe and balanced strategy is going to be exceptionally profitable for the bank. My last general comment about all this is about Panacea and our efforts to deconsolidate. We have made some of the change.

We made what we think are most of the changes near the end of the first quarter to lessen our control over the parent company and believe we may be close to being able to illustrate a real case for deconsolidation. Given that the gain is large and the accounting is complex, we are working closely with our consultants and with CRO to know for sure if the changes are adequate. Consolidating Pantasy in the first quarter reduced our operating ROA by 10 basis points simply from reporting our share of the non tax affected operating loss in our results. So consolidating this would have an additional impact improvement in our results. I’d to comment quickly about the consumer book that’s driven all of the volatility in our results and

Matt Switzer, Chief Financial Officer, Premise Financial Corporation: really covered up a lot

Dennis Semmer, President and Chief Executive Officer, Premise Financial Corporation: of the progress and improvements we’ve made in the company. We moved the portfolio back to our held for investment portfolio as the prospects to sell the portfolio faded. Virtually all of the volatility and risk in this portfolio centered around the loans with promotional features that have declined from $90,000,000 at June thirty of ’twenty four to only $17,000,000 at the end of the most recent quarter. The standard portfolio has good consumer performance and the remaining portfolio of promotional loans are reserved at 75% of the principal balance that we expect to roll to amortization. We evaluated this book aggressively in the quarter as we moved it to held for investment in our CECL model and we booked an additional provision related to that analysis.

But going forward, we believe we’ve neutralized the noise and volatility here and are focused on earning back the hits we took on debt as fast as possible. With that, Matt, I will turn it over to you. Thank you, Dennis.

Matt Switzer, Chief Financial Officer, Premise Financial Corporation: As a reminder, a detailed discussion of our financial results can be found in our press release, on our website and in our eight ks filed with the SEC. As Dennis mentioned, as in prior periods, the financial results for Panacea Holdings are included in our consolidated earnings. When you exclude the consolidated pretax loss from Panacea Holdings, we reported pre tax net income of $4,500,000 in the first quarter. We also had a little over $1,000,000 of one time items largely related to accounting expense and $1,900,000 of additional credit expense as we move the consumer portfolio back to held for investment. Adjusting for these items, pretax net income was $7,500,000 or $5,900,000 after tax, which equates to a 66 basis point ROA in the first quarter.

As we previously discussed, we expected ROA in Q1 to be lower due to the balance sheet shrinkage from the sale of the Life Premium Finance portfolio in the fall, which caused earning assets to be 10% lower than the third quarter of last year prior to the sale. The first quarter also exhibits seasonal slowness in mortgage and mortgage warehouse. As Dennis discussed, focus has been making sure we execute on the strategies that drive ROA higher from here, which we are doing. Net interest margin in the first quarter was 3.15%, up from the reported two ninety basis points last quarter. We ratcheted down deposit costs exiting last year, particularly on the digital platform, benefiting the margin.

Core bank cost of deposits remained very attractive at 183 basis points. We are still booking new loans with yields well over 7% and we have a substantial amount of loans repricing later this year well below that level that will continue to help the margin. Non interest income was $7,800,000 in the quarter versus $8,500,000 in the fourth quarter when excluding the Life Premium Finance gain. Increased mortgage revenue was offset by a negative swing linked quarter of $1,200,000 in fee income related to the consumer program that we are running off. A substantial driver of that swing was the continued write down of the derivative asset related to loans exiting promotional periods.

The derivative value was down to $1,600,000 at March 31 and will amortize off at a much slower rate over the next five quarters. On the expense side, when you exclude mortgage volatility and non recurring items, our core expenses were $20,300,000 down $3,200,000 from the fourth quarter and more in line with prior periods. We have continued to prioritize holding the line on expenses to position ourselves for substantial operating leverage going forward. The technology saves Dennis discussed have the potential to reduce that run rate an additional 9%, not including the efficiencies in other areas that come with simplifying our infrastructure. Looking forward, our focus is on executing the plan we have laid out.

Growing earning assets back to $3,750,000,000 would add 24 basis points to the ROA. Achieving the growth in mortgage volumes and profitability expansion that’s right in front of us would add 15 basis points. And reducing our technology spend would add another 15 basis points. Collectively, that puts us on track to exceed the 1% ROA goal we set out for ourselves. With that, operator, we can now open the line for questions.

Aaron, Conference Operator: Thank you very much. Our first question for today comes from the line of Christopher Marinac with Janney Montgomery and Scott.

Dennis Semmer, President and Chief Executive Officer, Premise Financial Corporation: Dennis and Matt, I wanted

Christopher Marinac, Analyst, Janney Montgomery and Scott: to ask about any wrenches that you see in the second quarter for not being able to get back to this higher profitability? I know there’s some progress and it’s going be several quarters in the making, but just looking specifically at kind of a transition to better numbers in Q2. Is there anything that you see that could throw you off another quarter?

Dennis Semmer, President and Chief Executive Officer, Premise Financial Corporation: I mean, we are up over average balances over the first quarter to where we are right now. We’re up about $60,000,000 in earning assets. So I think the track towards having upside on the margin, I think we’re tracking well there. We’re about to come into the season where I expect mortgage warehouse to be up a little just seasonally. The core banks closing loans that have been in the pipeline and doing well there.

So I see that. We’re taking on average I mean, in March, we took about $160,000,000 of applications in the mortgage group. We closed about 65% of those. That’s up 45% over January and February, so up pretty tremendously this month. I mean, we’ve got today left to go, but it looks like this month we’re gonna beat that number.

So I think the mortgage number is gonna come in strong, on track with what we’re looking for. And on operating expense, there really is nothing on the there’s there’s really nothing around here that’s pressuring operating expense to to move higher. We’re not going to have the professional fees on a go forward basis. I mean, a lot of the professional fees we had in the first quarter were just to, you know our auditor didn’t get the job and start working until October. October.

I mean, that’s probably, you know, easy three, four months. They had to do a couple queues to get through the year and just accelerating that. That’s not going to continue. So I know those calls are coming out. I do believe we’re gonna be able to deconsolidate Panacea.

We may have to make a couple more tweaks, you know, working with our auditors and with with the consultants. But I feel like we’ve done the vast majority of that. So that savings is gonna come as well as, hopefully, the pretty material pickup in book value.

Matt Switzer, Chief Financial Officer, Premise Financial Corporation: So Yeah. I mean, I I agree with everything Dennis said. I mean, Chris, our our key I mean, mortgage is kinda baked in the cake at this point. We’re going into the busy season. They’ve recruited a tremendous couple of teams here recently in addition to the recruiting from late last year.

So I mean, we’re very confident in mortgage volumes even in this rate environment. Mortgage warehouse was up 80% in the quarter, but a lot of that growth in balances came at the end of the quarter. So you didn’t really see it in the average balance and net interest income in the first quarter because of seasonality. But they’re going to be up substantially on an average basis in the second quarter by a healthy bit. And they’re getting good yields with fees on their business.

And the core bank is showing good momentum. Again, they were kind of flattish in the first quarter, but that’s just because January and February is always so slow. But they had healthy closings in March, and that’s even with some of that being pushed into April. So as Dennis said, we’re already up for the month of April relative to March. So all the momentum is there.

It’s our whole story is getting to the back half of ’25 and holding the line on expenses, which we feel confident in and rebuilding earning assets. As you know, that those earning assets compound, we’ve got to get stuff booked and on the balance sheet here to replace what we sold late last year, but we’re in progress on that.

Christopher Marinac, Analyst, Janney Montgomery and Scott: That’s super. Thank you both for the background all those fronts. And then just wanted to ask about the consumer loans. Is the sort of resolution on those and payoff, is a chunk of that going to happen this next three or four quarters? Just would you just remind us on kind of the time frame that those will get worked out?

Dennis Semmer, President and Chief Executive Officer, Premise Financial Corporation: The payoff rate in the first quarter on the standard book, which is the promo loans definitely will more than half of those are scheduled to pay off before the promo period ends given what’s remaining. And then the rest are sort of resolved with the pretty substantial reserves we have. So I think the promo book is by the end of the year, think we have the promo book being down to $4,000,000 or $5,000,000 The remaining book is about $100,000,000 It’s standard consumer paper. It’s low interest rate, low payment. The payoff rate on that, Chris, is about 7% per quarter, at least it was in the first quarter.

So if

Matt Switzer, Chief Financial Officer, Premise Financial Corporation: you look at that, you

Dennis Semmer, President and Chief Executive Officer, Premise Financial Corporation: probably could realistically believe that 20% to 30% of that would pay off this year, maybe a little more.

Matt Switzer, Chief Financial Officer, Premise Financial Corporation: So I think it’s amortizing. It’s fully amortizing paper. So it’s just we’re not we’re not booking anymore, and it’s now just running it down over time.

Dennis Semmer, President and Chief Executive Officer, Premise Financial Corporation: Middle of last year, we had $200,000,000 in this book. I think we’ll end this year probably eighteen months later, I think we’ll end this year probably somewhere, call it, $135,000,000 to $75,000,000

Christopher Marinac, Analyst, Janney Montgomery and Scott: Great. That helps. Thank you very much. I’ll step back.

Aaron, Conference Operator: Thank you for your questions. Our next question is from the line of Russell Gunther with Stephens Incorporated. Your line is live.

Russell Gunther, Analyst, Stephens Incorporated: Hey. Good morning, guys.

Matt Switzer, Chief Financial Officer, Premise Financial Corporation: Hey, Russell.

Russell Gunther, Analyst, Stephens Incorporated: Appreciate all of the color on the average earning asset walk and where new yields and deposits came on this quarter. Could you just give us a sense for how that translates to the margin outlook in 2Q and across the remainder of the year?

Dennis Semmer, President and Chief Executive Officer, Premise Financial Corporation: I mean, think we’ll

Matt Switzer, Chief Financial Officer, Premise Financial Corporation: see, I don’t know, five, ten basis points of margin expansion in the second quarter. And then for by the end of the year, we’ll probably be up, call it, 10 to 15 basis points, maybe 10 to 20, depending on what happens with the broader rate environment.

Dennis Semmer, President and Chief Executive Officer, Premise Financial Corporation: The loan repricing that we’re having in the core bank are easily 100 basis points higher than where the book is. Even now with rates sort of settling down on the five to ten year and one month SOFR, we’re still picking up yield on loan repricing. Deposits, you know, said they were in the just below 2%, probably 190ish, 195. The core bank’s cost of deposit is 183 or 184? 1 hundred 80 3.

So I mean really we’re sort of growing the core bank with very I mean almost no move in on deposit cost. So pretty strong there. Mortgage warehouse has a margin that’s better than our overall margin. So as that grows, I’d expect you to see some of that sort of fade into the numbers and lift the margin. So I like the numbers Matt’s telling you.

Russell Gunther, Analyst, Stephens Incorporated: That’s helpful, guys. I appreciate it. And then a follow-up to the expense conversation you had earlier. If you could just kind of give us a walk through of where we stand at 1Q and folding in the additional savings, should they materialize, how should we think about an exit core non interest expense base in 4Q assuming Panacea deconsolidation?

Dennis Semmer, President and Chief Executive Officer, Premise Financial Corporation: Yes. There’s a table in

Matt Switzer, Chief Financial Officer, Premise Financial Corporation: the press release that walks through that, Russell, that kind of takes out all the different parts, including panacea’s impact and mortgage impact to get to that core level. So take a look at that, then let me know if you have follow-up questions. I would say, you know, that run rate should be pretty consistent for the rest of this year. The core consolidation savings is really it’s possible we would see some late this year depending on the final negotiations on that. But it’s more likely something that will affect 2026.

Dennis Semmer, President and Chief Executive Officer, Premise Financial Corporation: Russell, ’1 thing too. The Matt backed out the panacea. When you look at the core banks, OpEx is right at $20,000,000 and very consistent with where we were a year ago. I’m, like, showing how hard we’ve been managing that around here. Matt backed out Panacea OpEx because when we calculate the impact of Panacea, we basically get paid for all of those operating expenses, and you might see them sort of meander through non interest income or non interest expense wherever we allocate that.

But really what matters and mortgage as well, mortgage OpEx really just drives mortgage revenues. So really the number that matters is that $20,000,000 I think it’s 20.2 or 20.5 this quarter. That’s really the number that matters. And I will tell you that we, you know, we’re not having any massive moves around here, but we are trimming back. And, you know, anything that’s redundant, we’re looking at that.

We’re, you know, consolidating other contracts that maybe are not core related and saving there. The whole goal, again, is to hold OpEx flat and let all of the growth, whether it’s mortgage, panacea, earning assets, whatever we do, skip OpEx and get a % leverage and scale straight to the bottom line. And I’m very confident that we’ll we’ll do all that. I think if we can finish the year somewhere right around ’20, maybe a touch below that, I think the I think the quarterly pickup on the on negotiating this core contract consolidation is probably 1,500,000.0 to $2,000,000 a quarter. So it’s a like Matt said, 9% is a material material move, And that’s really on today’s number.

So if we could grow the bank back to where we were second quarter, hold the line on OpEx, and then get these savings, I think the operating results impact is going to be very, very noticeable.

Russell Gunther, Analyst, Stephens Incorporated: Okay. So I guess my follow-up and just what I’m trying to get at is, so that 20.2, when you’re saying expect to finish the year around there, once we fold in the, you know, tech and data processing spend, we should expect that to reduce by the one and a half to two, or is that one and a half kind of inclusive?

Dennis Semmer, President and Chief Executive Officer, Premise Financial Corporation: Yeah. I’d say 18 and a half. I’d say 18 to 18 and a half. With everything else that we’re working on, we probably we might could get to 18, but 18 and a half, I’m very confident we’d get to.

Russell Gunther, Analyst, Stephens Incorporated: Okay. That’s super helpful, guys. That’s what I was trying to get to. And then just switching gears on your outlook for charge offs going forward, just given all the actions that have already been taken in consumer, that was the bulk of charge offs this quarter. How would you expect that ratio to trend over the course of the year?

Dennis Semmer, President and Chief Executive Officer, Premise Financial Corporation: I think we’ll continue to

Matt Switzer, Chief Financial Officer, Premise Financial Corporation: see high charge offs. The key will be we’re not expecting to see high provisions related to them, right? And so our core charge offs was, I think, five or six basis points when you take out the consumer. The portfolio was in runoff. It’s got a 16% total reserve with discounts against it.

There’s going to be charge offs against that reserve, but the key is have we got enough allowance and discounts against that portfolio to absorb the charge offs as it runs off? We think we do at this point.

Dennis Semmer, President and Chief Executive Officer, Premise Financial Corporation: Pretty confident that we do.

Matt Switzer, Chief Financial Officer, Premise Financial Corporation: I mean, the promo book, like we said,

Dennis Semmer, President and Chief Executive Officer, Premise Financial Corporation: is 75% reserves on what we think will roll to AM. The delinquent book has comparable reserves. And then the standard book has reserves that are probably four times three or four times the rest of our consumer, our homegrown consumer book. So we think we’re appropriately marked. I mean, we’re we so we may have the charge off.

I think we rolling through those three quarters of promo loans, that’s where the charge offs are coming. And we had in the second excuse me, the first quarter, we had about $20,000,000 of promo loans mature, about 10 of it paid off and 10 of it rolled. And of that 10 so, again, that 10 is probably marked with $7,500,000

Matt Switzer, Chief Financial Officer, Premise Financial Corporation: of reserve.

Dennis Semmer, President and Chief Executive Officer, Premise Financial Corporation: And if we can around numbers. And so that’s what Matt’s kinda saying. If we we don’t think the the charge offs will be greater than seven and a half, but that’s where we’re that’s where we’re more.

Russell Gunther, Analyst, Stephens Incorporated: Got it. Okay. Super helpful. And then just last one for me. You guys mentioned, you

Matt Switzer, Chief Financial Officer, Premise Financial Corporation: know, a lot of the

Russell Gunther, Analyst, Stephens Incorporated: work has been done around, the Panacea deconsolidation. So just, you know, best guesses in terms of when that should occur from a timing perspective and reminder on what the pickup, in the game could be.

Matt Switzer, Chief Financial Officer, Premise Financial Corporation: So Dennis mentioned, we made the changes operationally and whatnot technically at the end of the first quarter, but then we have to evaluate whether going through the accounting and GAAP requirements does that suggest that we no longer need to deconsolidate it. If we come to that conclusion, it would actually be effective March 31. So even though we haven’t reflected it in our numbers here, we would reflect it. We would revise the first quarter to reflect that, and it would show up in our we we would obviously make that public, but it would show up in our results when we file our 10 q, which is scheduled for, May 12, I believe. So, again, no guarantee that we’re gonna come to that conclusion.

Still a lot of work to be done to sort through that. It’s a very complicated analysis. But if we did, make that determination, it would be effective at the end of the first quarter. We would, elect the fair value treatment for that investment, which means we would market to fair market value. We’re carrying it at basically zero, So we would book a substantial gain from writing it up.

And that’s gonna have to require given the size of it, we need a third party to do that valuation, which we’re getting in parallel in case we do get that determination or make that determination to deconsolidate so that we’ll be prepared. I can’t tell you what that valuation is going to be, though we have indicated publicly that the value of those shares at the time of the Pantheon Holdings capital raise at the end of ’twenty three was just under $20,000,000 pretax. Given all the progress they’ve made since then, we would like to think that it would be worth more than the valuation of that capital raise, but, that’s all subject to a third party valuation.

Russell Gunther, Analyst, Stephens Incorporated: Understood. Okay, guys. That’s a lot of help. I appreciate it. That’s it for me.

Aaron, Conference Operator: Thank you for your questions. Ladies and gentlemen, that will conclude our Q and A session for today. Dennis, I’d like to hand it back over to you for any closing comments.

Dennis Semmer, President and Chief Executive Officer, Premise Financial Corporation: Okay. Thank you again for joining the call and your interest. If you have any questions or comments, Matt and are available, give us a ring. Thank you. Have a great day.

Aaron, Conference Operator: Thank you.

This article was generated with the support of AI and reviewed by an editor. For more information see our T&C.