Global Payments at JPMorgan Conference: Strategic Asset Swap Insights

Published 13/05/2025, 20:04
Global Payments at JPMorgan Conference: Strategic Asset Swap Insights

On Tuesday, 13 May 2025, Global Payments Inc. (NYSE:GPN) discussed its strategic initiatives at the 53rd Annual JPMorgan Global Technology, Media and Communications Conference. CEO Cameron Brady outlined the company’s recent asset swap with Worldpay and the divestiture of its issuer business, highlighting long-term value creation and the complementary nature of the businesses. While expressing confidence in the integration strategy, Brady also acknowledged potential challenges in maintaining focus during the transition.

Key Takeaways

  • Global Payments has engaged in a strategic asset swap with Worldpay, aiming to enhance long-term value.
  • The company plans to maintain its investment-grade credit rating and prioritize deleveraging post-transaction.
  • CEO Cameron Brady emphasized the complementary strengths of Global Payments and Worldpay.
  • The Genius platform is set to consolidate key functionalities for seamless operations.
  • Global Payments expects industry consolidation due to the need for scale and regulatory pressures.

Financial Results

  • Q1 2025 Performance:

- Strong execution was noted across the business.

- Consumer activity remained healthy, with Asia showing increased cross-border activity.

- The company reaffirmed its annual guidance.

  • Macroeconomic Conditions:

- Resilient consumer spending and a solid labor market were observed.

- Inflation appears under control, with core consumption up 2.3% in Q1, excluding imports.

  • Worldpay Synergies:

- Expected cost synergies of $600 million, approximately 18% of Worldpay’s expense base.

Operational Updates

  • Integration Strategy:

- A unified operating model will guide the integration of Global Payments and Worldpay.

- Both businesses will operate under a common brand from the outset.

  • Genius Platform:

- Designed for fast-paced environments, it aims to provide a fully integrated offering through a cloud-native platform.

  • Worldpay Asset:

- Worldpay’s growth is set to improve, with projections to become a mid-single-digit grower by 2026-2027.

  • Divestitures:

- Plans to divest $200-300 million in revenue, with proceeds returned to shareholders.

Future Outlook

  • Capital Allocation:

- Aiming for 3x leverage by year-end and 3.5x at the close of the Worldpay transaction, with a return to 3x within 18-24 months.

- Plans to return approximately $7 billion to shareholders between 2025-2027.

- By 2028, levered free cash flow is projected to be 50% higher than standalone estimates, potentially exceeding $4 billion.

  • Industry Consolidation:

- A phase of consolidation is anticipated, driven by the need for scale and increasing regulatory intensity.

Q&A Highlights

  • Macroeconomic Concerns:

- Despite monitoring tariffs and risks, the spending environment remains stable.

  • Integration of Worldpay:

- Focus on execution and transformation to minimize disruption.

  • Differentiation Strategy:

- The combined entity aims to offer superior product capabilities and scale.

  • Confidence in Execution:

- Experience in integrations will support successful execution, with resources freed by divesting the issuer business.

For a complete understanding of Global Payments’ strategies and insights, refer to the full conference call transcript.

Full transcript - 53rd Annual JPMorgan Global Technology, Media and Communications Conference:

Tien Tsin Huang, Analyst, JPMorgan: Okay. We can get started. Sorry. We’re little bit late. Hey, Josh.

My name is Tien Tsin Huang. I cover the payments and IT services sector at at JPMorgan, and super excited to have Cameron Brady back from Global Payments. He’s the CEO of the company. Cameron, thank you for being here with us.

Cameron Brady, CEO, Global Payments: Thanks for having us.

Tien Tsin Huang, Analyst, JPMorgan: Cameron, I always I don’t know if it’s a fair statement, but I always think of you as a student of the industry. You always listen, and I always appreciate our our back and forth, and I know there’s a lot going on, and and and you’re really busy, so thank you for being here.

Cameron Brady, CEO, Global Payments: No. Absolutely.

Tien Tsin Huang, Analyst, JPMorgan: So let’s dig right into it. I, of course, polled everyone and tried to gather a lot of good questions to take advantage of the time that we have with you. But I figured, just to kick it off, I thought it’d good to get an update on, of course, the transaction, the three way transaction, how you’re feeling now. It’s been, what, a month or so since the announcement of the asset swap with you taking on Worldpay and divesting issuer. How do you feel a month in?

Cameron Brady, CEO, Global Payments: Yeah. Look. I I think it’s fair to say we feel great about the transactions. Obviously, clearly recognize we announced them at a time when there was a lot of market sort of macro uncertainty and a little bit of volatility. So perhaps in the grand scheme of things, not the ideal time to announce a transaction like this, but the reality is you can’t always plan for when these types of transactions come together.

And this was such a unique opportunity that it’s something that we had to, you know, pursue. We thought it was clearly in the best long term interest of the business to pursue it, but certainly it’s not lost on us that the timing perhaps from a market standpoint wasn’t ideal. But be that as it may, we’re driving sort of long term value creation and we’re trying to position the business as best we can strategically for the long term. And clearly, this transaction is a very compelling opportunity for our company. And there’s not a scenario that I contemplate where we’re not better off by doing this transaction than we were obviously continuing forward with our standalone plan.

So look, the last month has been terrific. It’s given us a real opportunity to kind of deep dive with investors around the opportunity, the strategic rationale, the financial profile of the combined business, how this enhances sort of our financial position meaningfully, and we’ve got a great deal of conviction from the board down that this was absolutely the right thing for us to do as a company, and the long term value creation potential is significantly better than it would have been on our on our standalone journey.

Tien Tsin Huang, Analyst, JPMorgan: Yeah. And and I could feel that through your tone here and through the call. I gotta say, Cameron, I think thinking back over time, I’ve always felt like we’d see eventually two large processors on on the merchant side. So timing is one thing, but directionally, I feel like we’ve been going down this path for for some time. So it’s it’s interesting to see that it’s it’s coming together now.

Cameron Brady, CEO, Global Payments: Yeah. I I think that’s right. As as I step back and look. Our business and the Worldpay business are extraordinarily complementary. Mhmm.

I mean, more so than probably anything else I’ve seen in

Tien Tsin Huang, Analyst, JPMorgan: my career. Hundred percent agree.

Cameron Brady, CEO, Global Payments: Their strengths are not our strengths and our strengths are not their strengths. And when you think about putting the two businesses together, it’s incredibly powerful combination. What what I love about it more than anything else, and I think that’s probably an underappreciated element of it is, look, it’s the ability to blend innovation at a level that quite frankly is astounding. At over a billion dollars a year, we’ll be investing in new product capability and innovation in the business. And marrying that with a scale profile, $4,000,000,000,000 of processing volume, that let’s be honest, very few can match from a competitive standpoint in the marketplace.

So the ability to marry kind of best in class product and capability in a level to innovate ongoing in the business with the scale benefits that combined company brings is really powerful. And the flip side is our issuer business kind of belongs with FIS. Their go to market motion is all about FIs and that’s what our issuer business is really centered around. And it’s a great fit for them, and it’s a fantastic fit for us. So it’s rare in life, and it’s that’s why it’s such a unique opportunity and why we had to move on it when it became available to us to to ultimately structure a transaction like this that results in good outcomes for all the parties involved.

Tien Tsin Huang, Analyst, JPMorgan: Yeah. I know it’s not easy. I know it takes courage. And so, yeah, glad glad to see it come come through. So, let let’s just get this obligatory macro stuff out of the way, you don’t mind, Cameron.

Just I have to ask you. Right? If there’s any update on the consumer, SMBs, you you see a lot of volume, of course. How healthy is the is the macro?

Cameron Brady, CEO, Global Payments: Look. I think the consumer remains very resilient, and the trends we continue to see in the business have been consistent throughout the course of 2025. I think you step back and look at just the broader environment for spending, it’s it’s actually pretty good. Right. Like, the labor market’s fairly solid.

Wage growth continues to be steady. Inflation seems to be, you know, under control and as evidenced by the print this morning. So if you look at the backdrop for spending, it’s actually pretty good. And and even q one GDP, which got a lot of headlines, if you strip out the impact of imports, core consumption was up to 2.3%. That’s not a bad number.

So I think it suggests that the underlying consumption trends and the consumer is very stable, very resilient. Naturally, like everybody, we’re watching what happens with tariffs and potential risk around that, but that seems to be working itself out. So I think the backdrop, look, I’d love it to be better, but it’s stable and it’s resilient and I think we feel good about the underlying trends we’re seeing in the business. I have to say though, mean, it obviously starts with our own execution. And what we’re seeing in our business from an execution standpoint is really good.

And I’m really proud of our team for what we’ve been able to accomplish, not just in terms of the day to day running the business, but doing that while also delivering on our transformation initiatives and the progress that we’re making on that front, which I really think positions our business incredibly well, not only for the future, but also gives us the right foundation in which to integrate Worldpay.

Tien Tsin Huang, Analyst, JPMorgan: Yeah. So the first quarter was clean as we described surprises, but I figured I’d ask you before we go on. Any surprises from from your side on the first quarter?

Cameron Brady, CEO, Global Payments: No. I think we were really pleased with the result. As I said, it starts with really solid execution kind of across the business. The trends by and large were what we were anticipating. Good healthy sort of consumer, you know, activity across most of the markets around the globe in which we we operate.

We saw some better trends in some of the international markets. Asia had a good quarter. We saw a little more cross border activity than we’ve seen, you know, in a while there, which was encouraging. But by and large, it was, you know, pardon the golf analogy, it was pretty center of the fairway for us and really pleased with the momentum we’re kinda carrying into the balance of the year. And obviously, we reiterated our guide for the year, which we’ve got a lot of confidence on delivering on that while also working to get the the Worldpay transaction closed.

Good.

Tien Tsin Huang, Analyst, JPMorgan: Trying to think how we should move forward. So, let’s do in the let’s do merchant, just to stick with that. So, the quarter itself, and I’m thinking about revenue performance here, was pretty steady for Global Payments. Yep. And, the theme leading up to your quarter was the peer group couldn’t quite live up or overcome the leap year piece, and you saw a little bit of deceleration.

We didn’t see that at global payments. I’m curious to hear why that might be the case. Was there something else from a mix or pricing that you were doing that drove the difference?

Cameron Brady, CEO, Global Payments: No. I think it’s really just, again, stable underlying trends across our business. And I try to remind people of this all the time because I think it’s important. We’re not the market. Right?

Our results are largely a function of sort of the unique dynamics in our own business. And look, coming out of q four, I had people ask me why didn’t you see a little more volume uplift with the holidays? And I’m like, well, we’re not well exposed to sort of the retail big box digital native trends around the holiday that drives a lot of the volume. And same thing in Q1, we’re not exposed to the fact that Easter was in Q1 last year and is in Q2 this year, so we didn’t really have that headwind. So I would say there’s nothing specific I would call out.

Again, it starts with good execution across the business, good stable underlying trends. I do think some of the new sales performance that we saw in the back half of last year obviously is helping and is a nice tailwind as we get into 2025, and we see good momentum continuing on that front. But I think by and large, it’s just good stability in the underlying business while we continue to work through the transformation journey that we’re on.

Tien Tsin Huang, Analyst, JPMorgan: Okay. Good. So so back to the deal itself, if you don’t mind, Cameron. Just on the on the call, something that stood out to me. On the call, you said that you will approach the integration of Worldpay differently than you have in past deals.

Can you elaborate on what that means?

Cameron Brady, CEO, Global Payments: Yeah. I’d be happy to. I might start by just saying, look, integrating, you know, white for white transactions, you know, is a core competency about it.

Tien Tsin Huang, Analyst, JPMorgan: You know,

Cameron Brady, CEO, Global Payments: we’ve done a lot of it. I think that’s a good muscle that we have in our organization. And I think our ability to execute from an integration standpoint, I have no concerns about that. I have a lot of confidence in our ability to do that. My commentary my commentary on the earnings call is more about philosophy and mindset.

Right? We’re doing what? I’m sorry. Philosophy and mindset around how and how we think about sort of bringing these two businesses together. So we’re working through our own transformation to create sort of unified operating model globally.

We’re not going to compromise on that. We’re not gonna go back to a holding company operating company structure. We put a lot of effort into building the right operating model, building the scalable processes in our business to support our standalone business. That is what we’re going to leverage as we go forward and we won’t compromise. We’re also going to combine the businesses day one under a common brand.

I know that sounds like a small thing, but it’s a really important thing I think in terms of how we want to drive the business and how we want to unify our organization as we go forward. I think as it relates to fully integrating the business from a technology operating environment, commercial go to market perspective, again, we’re not going to compromise on the outcomes that we want to drive. Our goal is to drive this to be a fully unified integrated business as early as we can under a common brand with a common go to market motion, leveraging common technology and operating environments, leveraging the model that we built inside of our business now. That’s when I talk about approaching it differently, it’s really that philosophy and mindset around the outcomes we wanna drive and how we’re gonna approach the the the actual activity. It’s not the execution arm itself, which I, again, I have a lot of confidence in our ability to do that well.

Tien Tsin Huang, Analyst, JPMorgan: Got it. No. That’s very, very clear. So so bringing it up another level from a from a strategy standpoint, we we always like to talk about depth versus breadth. So when I talk to some of the consultants all the time, we’re always debating strategy in the chessboard, right, depth versus breadth.

I’m sure investors are tired of hearing me say it, but So global payments is choosing depth, right? And and removing, issuing makes a lot of sense like you you talked about. But but talk to us about the importance of depth here versus breadth. Do you think of those as mutually exclusive? Am I looking at this incorrectly when you bring in Worldpay and it’s more of a bet on on depth within merchant?

Cameron Brady, CEO, Global Payments: Yeah. I I don’t know that I see it exactly that way. Okay. Certainly understand the perspective, but I still think of the business as having depth and breadth. I think of it though as having pure focus now on merchant.

Focus. Good. So I think we will have depth and breadth in merchant, which I think having sort of a collective view of purpose in our organization, supporting merchants with commerce enablement solutions globally is really what we’re trying to drive the business towards. So I think this is a unique opportunity to have depth and breadth. As as I think about the combined business, there’s not a merchant from SMB to enterprise that we can’t serve.

There’s not a use case from card present to card not present to omnichannel that we can’t serve. There’s not a software partner, platform partner, marketplace partner globally that we can’t serve. The collective capabilities to bring both depth and breadth to our market offerings is incredibly powerful. It goes back to the conversation we’re having a second ago. So I don’t think of it as choosing one or the other.

I think about it as choosing having depth and breadth in merchant. If you’re gonna be pure play merchant, I think it’s important to have depth and breadth of capabilities across the full spectrum of merchant opportunities. And this transaction allows us to do that in spades, and that’s part of the value proposition that we see.

Tien Tsin Huang, Analyst, JPMorgan: Of course. So thinking about scale, I think you’ll be right there with JPMC based on the Nielsen data, just under 20% share. So a lot of scale there. You do have competitively players that are more vertically oriented. You know that very well.

Some of the software players are leaving your distribution. Then you have the diversified players that are trying to cross sell and may or may not embed merchant within that. So from a scale standpoint, how do you then differentiate and grow above market?

Cameron Brady, CEO, Global Payments: Yeah. I think it’s a fair question. It’s something I spend a a lot of time thinking about. And again, I’ll kinda go back to I don’t think you have to choose between the two. I think the power of this combination is it allows us to bring best in class capabilities, product solutions, feature functionality, whether it’s supporting the needs of digital native e com multinationals to point of sale to vertical market software to commerce enablement solutions.

We bring best in class product and capability and feature functionality to the market. And we’re marrying that with a level of scale again that I think is truly impressive. And an ability to invest to innovate, you know, at a billion plus dollars a year that’s gonna allow us to continue to remain very competitive in terms of our product suite and capability, but again, marry that with a level of scale and service experience that I think is truly distinctive. And it’s that combination that I don’t think is really fully understood completely yet about this transaction. And as I think about the market and clients choosing to work with us, you don’t have to choose between fintech that has really good product and capability, but maybe doesn’t support me in the right way, and I don’t have to work with that big scale player where I feel loved and they’re sort of catering to my needs, but I’m a little lacking on product.

Tien Tsin Huang, Analyst, JPMorgan: Yeah.

Cameron Brady, CEO, Global Payments: We bring both. And I think that is something that hopefully over time we’ll be able to better articulate and demonstrate in terms of how we bring the companies together and our success in the marketplace. That’s the most powerful part of this transaction that perhaps I haven’t done the best job articulating, but I think isn’t well understood yet that I hope over time will be much better understood.

Tien Tsin Huang, Analyst, JPMorgan: Yeah. Hey. Scale distribution, very, very important. You know, and merchant even But but it’s look.

Cameron Brady, CEO, Global Payments: It’s a competitive industry and having really attractive product and capability, feature rich solutions that really resonate with clients, it starts with that. Yep. Like, I don’t wanna I don’t wanna differentiate on price. That’s not the goal. Look, there’s a great benefit to being able to marry the product and the sort of scale economics, But the goal for our teams are not lead on lower price, it’s gonna be lead with the feature richness of the capabilities, and we can price compete with anyone given the scale in the business.

Tien Tsin Huang, Analyst, JPMorgan: Sure, makes sense. So yeah, you talked about a billion investment dollars available to the company that’s big. You know, we’ve heard from Toast today, we’ve heard from Block. I mean, Jack talked about how Square is back and they’ve showed their new hardware, etcetera. But, investors ask a lot and I I wanna ask you about it.

You’re you’re about to relaunch Genius platform. You’re standardizing your point of sale Yeah. On onto Genius. I think we’ll learn more in in some of the launches that are coming up. But, just give us a sales pitch on Genius and how it’s differentiated versus the peer group company.

Cameron Brady, CEO, Global Payments: Yeah. Think it’s a great question. And not to pick on your words, but it’s not a relaunch. It’s a launch of Launch of. Yeah.

And those are the market think that’s important look, you know, as I think about our business, we’ve always had really good point of sale product. Unfortunately, it’s been highly fragmented in our own environments. Right. You know, multiple platforms, multiple different lines of business, multiple sort of duplicative investment across them to be able to bring features and product to market. But we have really good products, we have really good features and capabilities and solutions.

We’ve just done a poor job of bringing that to market ubiquitously, organizing ourselves and aligning as a go to market matter, and having any sort of brand recognition in the market that starts to resonate and build momentum with clients. So Genius is really our opportunity to get that right. We’re consolidating all of our key functionality, capabilities, features onto common platform. We’re aligning around a go to market strategy that leverages the entire breadth of our distribution globally to bring those capabilities to market. And we’re aligning around the brand that we think over time is really going to resonate and build equity and start to demonstrate that we are a significant player from a point of sale perspective.

So as I look at that, it becomes a great backdrop and there’s a lot of excitement and energy in our business around what we can do with Genius long term. So where is it differentiated? I would say in a couple ways. One is, look, it’s it’s designed for the fast paced dynamic environments that you find in restaurant and retail environment. And the way I like to describe Genius is it’s better than most of our competitors, but competitive with all.

Okay. So I think it’s a platform that is feature rich, incredibly functional, that is going to compete very effectively in the market, and quite frankly, in our humble opinion, is better than most of our competitors. I think what really differentiates it as a platform matter is it’s it’s not a marketplace of point solutions. It’s a fully integrated seamless offering of all of our capabilities that are delivered through a modern scaled cloud native environment to clients. And what I really like about it is we can solve sort of the unique kind of workflow use cases of small independent businesses, but also effortlessly scale to kind of meet the complex requirements of high volume environments.

So think enterprise QSR, stadiums, etcetera. And having that full functionality range inside of the ecosystem allows us to sort of create pre configurations for smaller businesses to benefit from some of the capabilities that larger enterprise customers have, but also allows them to manage it and configure dynamic way to meet their own sort of unique requirements in their business. I think that functionality difference is is really differentiated for the platform. The second area I think of differentiation is the white glove service that we wrap around that experience. I think we have a good track record of demonstrating we can operate effectively and support clients in the most sophisticated of environments while sort of scaling down to meet the requirements of tens of thousands of SMBs globally.

So it’s a rare ability I think to have the enterprise depth in our business from a service and support standpoint, combined with the agility that you need to support SMBs on a global scale. And the uniqueness of bringing that all together in a common platform with a common delivery model with a common support structure, think will really differentiate our offerings over time.

Tien Tsin Huang, Analyst, JPMorgan: Good. No, thanks for going through that. That’s important and we’re excited to see it in more detail

We’re excited to see it in the field as well. Okay. Good. So so good to go through Genius. I I have to then ask about on the Worldpay side.

I I think through FIS we get to see some of the EMI. We don’t have a lot of access to the data, but it does sound like the Worldpay asset has improved its growth profile. So what can you share from diligence that they’ve done to change the asset and get to a point where you can be comfortably talking about synergies and how it doesn’t change your growth profile, etcetera?

Cameron Brady, CEO, Global Payments: Yeah. It’s a great question. As you can imagine, through diligence, this is an area that was a significant focus for We wanted to get ourselves comfortable in the growth profile of the business, where they were from a product and capability standpoint, and the trajectory that they were on as a business. And look, I give a lot of credit to Charles and the GTCR team. They’ve done an immense amount of work to put that business on a far better footing than it was I think a few years ago as it kind of worked through the FIS merger.

And I think it starts with look, this is not nuclear physics, we’re not splitting atoms here. This business is all about product and capability and distribution. And they’ve invested heavily in both and we’re seeing the benefits of that materialize in the growth profile of the business. It’s a solidly mid single digit grower today on a trajectory to improve that as we get to ’26 and ’27. And it starts with significant investments they’ve made in product and capability, particularly in the e com and enterprise space.

They have highly competitive, best in class offerings in a variety of places supporting enterprise and ecom customers globally that are really attractive. And obviously that’s 50% of their business growing at high single digits with obviously the digital native side growing a little faster, enterprise growing a little slower, but an overall attractive growth rate in that business. They have an amazing array of capabilities across FX, author rate optimization, payouts, fraud management and risk management. It’s attractive business and we’re seeing the fruits of their labor in terms of kind of the new wins, the growth profile and the sort of new sales pipeline of opportunities is really very attractive. Attractive.

So we feel really good about that business, again it’s 50% of their company, it’s something we don’t do today inside of Global, so that’s purely additive to what we do. We’ve also seen really good performance on the PayRig side, so the managed pay fac solution that they’re bringing to market. That has really attractive growth rates. It’s very competitive in the marketplace today. It accelerates roadmap investment that we had on our own pipelines to support our integrated and embedded business.

It’s definitely additive to our integrated sort of strategy and go to market positioning. And it really positions us, as I mentioned at the beginning, where we can serve any software platform marketplace partner with the right tools and capabilities, but more importantly with an operating model that’s really tailored to the specific needs of their business. It’s not a situation where you go to market with, here’s your API, you integrate to that and you get what you get. We can tailor solutions I think in really unique and compelling ways across software platform and marketplace partners that others are not going to be able to compete with. So I think in terms of where we see the integrated business going longer term, the investments they’ve made around pay rates are really attractive to the business and they’re seeing good growth as a result of that.

On the SMB side, I think their challenge has largely been product, right? They didn’t invest in a lot of SMB product, didn’t invest in a lot of SMB distribution. So obviously we bring all of that to So they’ve done a nice job stabilizing the SMB portfolio. They’re investing in distribution. That will be additive to what we’re doing, but they no longer really need to invest in a lot of product there we’ll bring that to them and it gives us better distribution and more distribution arms by which to drive better penetration and saturation of our own SMB oriented portfolio of commerce enablement solutions to the market.

So the long and short is the business is in a healthy place today. It’s on the right trajectory. And combined, our two businesses are going be able to drive better growth outcomes, better top line growth certainly over medium to long term horizon than what we could

Tien Tsin Huang, Analyst, JPMorgan: have delivered on a standalone basis. Good. So you’re streamlining, we talked about the relaunch of Genius. Worldpay sounds like it’s in a good place in terms of what Charles has done to get it back to mid single digit growth. You’re executing well.

You sound pleased with retention and growth and backlog and all that good stuff, Cameron. My question is just from a focus standpoint and integration work, we talked about that earlier, but how confident are you that you won’t miss a beat here, right, that these trends won’t continue as you’re focusing on this complex integration, I call it complex from the outside, but I know you’ve done a lot of these before, but give us a little bit more on why shareholders should be comfortable that you won’t miss a beat in terms of execution. And then more importantly, how will customers see the new global payments together with World pay once it closes?

Cameron Brady, CEO, Global Payments: Look, think it’s a very fair question and I clearly understand why investors are focused on it and why you’re focused on it. I would say a couple of things. The reality is the world we live in, it’s going to take probably a year to get this transaction closed. That gives us an entire year continue to work on our own transformation, build the right foundation, make sure that we fully tuned our operating model, our ways of working, our processes are scalable, so that when we integrate Worldpay, you know, we’re integrating into the right platform and foundation. So that’s kind of point number one.

If we announced the Worldpay transaction and we were going to close in sixty days, I would have felt differently about it. But having knowing that we have a good amount of time to continue the journey that we’re on, very happy with the momentum. There’s more that we want to get done before we get to close and we’re very focused on executing against that seamlessly over that period of time. The second thing I would say, and I think people forget this in sort of the conversation is, we’re divesting 25% of our company that I would argue certainly occupies more than 25% of my mind share in attention and bandwidth given where that business is. Our issuer business is a great business, but it’s in the midst of a multi year technology modernization program that’s not going to be done this year.

It’s in the midst of a multiyear conversion process with existing clients to move from its current environment to the new cloud native environments. And it’s a business where we’re having to spend a significant amount of time obviously trying to drive growth outcomes, you know, that once we divest that business, that’s going to free up a lot of time, effort, attention and bandwidth inside of our organization to be able to execute on the integration of Worldpay. So I think, you know, from my perspective, look there’s risk to getting out of bed in the morning. So there’s risk to everything that we do in life, but I think our ability to manage the risk around executing against our transformation, integrating Worldpay, I’ve got a lot of confidence in our team. And let’s be honest, we’re doing it in the business that we know the best.

We’re doing it in merchant and we know merchant I think really well. I have a team around the globe that I think is first class, got an amazing amount of confidence in their ability to execute. And this just boils down to our ability to execute. The opportunity is immense if we get this right and I have every confidence we’ll get it right and it’s largely an execution game that we’re focused on every single day.

Tien Tsin Huang, Analyst, JPMorgan: Yeah. Yeah. And I know you and Josh have done a lot of these, but I think I hope you appreciate why I asked the question. Of course I do. Yeah.

You know it’s it is important. So now we’re excited to see how it it comes together. One more on the cost synergy side, Cameron, just with Worldpay. Know it’s been through a few changes of ownership. I’m sure GTCR addressed it a little bit, but what’s your line of sight into the cost synergy that you’ve laid out bringing in Worldpay?

Yeah, it’s a good question. I would say, I

Cameron Brady, CEO, Global Payments: tell people I always sleep over a lot of things at night. I don’t lose sleep over the ability to realize the cost So as I step back and think about it, yes it’s been through some transactions, but it’s now been re stood up as a standalone company. So all that corporate administrative overhead, some of that’s being provided by FIS today under TSA, some of it’s now been built up in the Worldpay business, that’s clearly addressable. Technology wise and operating sort of model wise, it was being integrated in a business that didn’t have any like for like technology. So there’s immense opportunity from a technology harmonization and rationalization perspective and there’s an immense opportunity around the operating cost structure of the business as well as you’re putting like for like businesses together.

So I think if you look at the 600 in context, it’s like 18% of their expense base. That’s probably lower than most of the deals that we’ve in recent history that are like for like mergers of this nature. So we’ve got a lot of confidence in the 600. Look, I know we can get to those numbers, but more importantly, we can get to those numbers while remaining true to our plans around our own operating model, the kind of business we want to run without damaging any of the investment that they’re making in the business or damaging any investment in distribution or the trajectory that the business is on. So again, there’s a lot of things that worry me, but that is I think our ability to execute on that is not high on my list.

Tien Tsin Huang, Analyst, JPMorgan: Good. No. It’s important to have the right focus and the right energy. So I’m glad that you’re not losing over that. So I think just a couple more to make sure we ask divestitures.

Yeah. So you’re you’re I know you’re you have a little bit of time before this deal closes, but you’re still not quite done with some of the divestiture work Yep. On the streamlining side. So any any update there and when we might expect something?

Cameron Brady, CEO, Global Payments: Yeah. I can’t give you really any definitive time frame on what’s gonna come next or when it may come. All I would say is just going back to what we talked about at our investor conference in September, we plan to invest somewhere between 500 and $600,000,000 of revenue. We’ve done about 300,000,000, so we got a little ways to go. We have things in our pipeline that we’re continuing to work.

These are really attractive valuable businesses. We’re not going to give them away, simply to get to a number. But we’re working very hard to be able to continue to deliver expectation we set was around the amount of revenue we would divest. And as we have more to update on that, we will. The other thing I would just emphasize is when we do make divestitures, our plans are to return those proceeds to shareholders once we maintain sort of leverage neutrality.

So obviously it creates an opportunity to obviously return more capital. And I think it positions us well for a more streamlined simplified business as we move forward.

Tien Tsin Huang, Analyst, JPMorgan: Okay. And then sticking with the capital front, have to ask right with the stock, I know you’ve called it cheap and certainly at a low level here. Just your ability to buy back stock Cameron versus the deleveraging commitments that are out there, update us on that.

Cameron Brady, CEO, Global Payments: Yeah, we still have ability to buy back stock and you should assume that we are. Obviously, we’re very focused on maintaining the investment grade credit rating. That’s a priority for us without a doubt. Very focused on getting to three times leverage at the end of the year, which we’re on a trajectory to do. That still gives us capacity to continue to buy back in the interim interim opportunistically and you should assume that we’re doing that.

As we think about the transaction, we’ll be 3.5 times levered at close there or thereabouts, very focused on that metric because we think it’s important to sustaining our investment grade credit rating. But we delever very, very quickly. Over an eighteen to twenty four month time frame, we’ll be back to that three times levered. And as I think about the transaction and look, I I understand it came at a time that probably surprised people. But the reality is we can execute this transaction and over the twenty five to twenty seven timeframe still roughly return the same amount of capital that we had committed to return at our investor conference, seven billion versus 7.5.

So there or thereabouts. There may be opportunity to improve on the 7,000,000,000. But more importantly, as you get to the ’28 sort of timeframe, our levered free cash flow is 50% higher than it would have been on a standalone plan. So we’re looking at share returns or capital returns to investors in ’28, north of $4,000,000,000. You know, again 50% greater than what we would have had the capacity to do on a standalone basis.

There’s not a financial metric that we look at where this isn’t a much more compelling opportunity than our standalone plan. And our priorities from a capital allocation standpoint haven’t changed. We’re still prioritizing capital returns to shareholders. Over the twenty five to twenty seven timeframe, we’re doing roughly the same. Interestingly, in ’26 and ’27, we’re actually doing more than what we had in our original plan.

And by the time you get to ’28, we’re 50% higher than what we’d otherwise would have been able to do on a standalone basis. So look, if we get all this right, which I have a high degree of confidence we will, the value creation opportunity is immense. And, we have every every intention of executing against that.

Tien Tsin Huang, Analyst, JPMorgan: Good. No. It sounds like you’ve thought through that very, very clearly. So, thanks for going through that. Time flies.

We’re almost Forty seconds. I I wanted to ask just a big picture question. You know, Cameron, with with your the asset swap, we’ve seen a few companies go private here recently. We’ve seen some strategic investments and some different deal activity. Do you see the industry maybe going through a phase of consolidation again, given where we are in the cycle and maybe with, you know, what’s happening competitively?

I’m I’m curious how you see the the the the broader landscape.

Cameron Brady, CEO, Global Payments: Yeah. I do. I think, look, we’re coming off the heels of a multiyear sort of expansionary cycle in our space. And I think, to be honest, it’s oversaturated right now with investment opportunities. And I think naturally, this is a business upscale.

And over time, you’re gonna go through periods of expansion and you’re gonna go through periods contraction. And I think we’re entering into a time when you’re going to see more contraction in the space. You’re going to see more consolidation. You’re going to see more M and A. That probably makes Greg happy.

But I do think we’re approaching kind of a cycle where, look, scale matters and it matters now more than ever in our business and you’re going to start to see people move towards more consolidation opportunities driving more scale. The regulatory intensity around the business continues to grow. I think scale is obviously helpful in being able to address that effectively. So I think naturally we’re going to see that period in front of us coming off of a multi year period of a lot of expansion and a lot of saturation of new names in the space.

Tien Tsin Huang, Analyst, JPMorgan: Cameron, was great to talk to you.

Cameron Brady, CEO, Global Payments: It’s great to

Tien Tsin Huang, Analyst, JPMorgan: see you.

Cameron Brady, CEO, Global Payments: Thanks for having us. Thanks, sir. Thanks.

This article was generated with the support of AI and reviewed by an editor. For more information see our T&C.

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers
© 2007-2025 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.