CPU Vs. GPU: The Changing Semiconductor Landscape

Published 22/04/2026, 05:54
Updated 22/04/2026, 08:16

Since the start of the year, the iShares Semiconductor ETF (NASDAQ:SOXX) is up 33% compared with the broader market, which is up only 4%. The primary rationale for the significant outperformance appears to be the insatiable demand for AI and a shift in its usage.

Unlike the past couple of years, in which Nvidia and its GPU production for the development of large language models (LLMs) led the AI chip market, CPU usage is gaining ground as AI agentic models become more popular. Accordingly, CPU producers like Intel (NASDAQ:INTC) and AMD are now playing catch-up to Nvidia (NASDAQ:NVDA), the primary GPU producer. The graphic below shows that agentic AI is equally reliant on CPU and GPU chips, unlike the GPU-centric development of LLMs.

While Nvidia may lose some market share as CPU usage grows relative to GPU usage, there is another facet to consider that favors Nvidia. Profit margins on GPUs are almost double that of CPUs. For example, Nvidia has a profit margin of about 75%, while Intel and AMD are in the low- to mid-40 % range. There are two primary reasons for the distinct advantage as follows:

  • Inelastic AI demand — Hyperscalers like Microsoft, Google, Meta, and Amazon are willing to pay premium prices for GPU chips because the alternative (delayed AI deployment) is costlier.
  • Monopoly pricingNVIDIA controls ~80–90% of AI GPU supply, giving it enormous pricing power.

CPUs are much more of a commodity than GPUs. As such, they face much more intense competition, which compresses margins. There are also ARM-based alternatives that offer further competition. So while CPU usage will increase relative to GPUs, profit margins will likely further compress for CPU makers, while remaining abnormally high for Nvidia.

CPU vs GPU Ratio

Technology Leads As Breadth Deteriorates

A 13% rally in 13 days is quite the feat. Within the sharp rally, there is also a sharp divergence in returns. Hands down, technology led the market higher, while many other sectors relatively languished. As we show below, over the last three weeks, technology stocks (XLK) have moved from the bottom left, indicating oversold conditions on both an absolute and a relative basis, to overbought on both. At the same time, two of the more recently favored sectors, staples (XLP) and utilities (XLU), have moved lower. Their absolute scores haven’t changed much, but their relative scores have fallen quite a bit.

The market was in a topping pattern of sorts from November until a few weeks ago. During that period, lower-beta sectors led the way, while technology and communications faltered. The recent rally, as we noted, is being led by the sectors that powered the market before November. This again raises the question of whether the recent outperformance of technology and other large-cap growth stocks signals that the upward trend is back on track, or a brief respite before value and low beta take over and prices consolidate or even decline.Tech Sector (XLK) vs SPY Performance

Tweet of the Day

Tweet of the Day

Original Post

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers
© 2007-2026 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.