ION expands ETF trading capabilities with Tradeweb integration
MP Materials (NYSE:MP) has delivered a masterclass in speculative excess, rocketing 318% year-to-date before crashing 30.8% in nine days. The rare earth miner’s trajectory exposes a dangerous market pattern: genuine strategic crises can morph into valuation bubbles when patriotic narratives override fundamental analysis.
The setup appeared perfect. China controls 93% of global rare earth magnet manufacturing, the specialized components essential to F-35 fighter jets and modern electronics. On October 9, Beijing announced sweeping export restrictions for defense applications. The Pentagon responded with a $1 billion emergency stockpiling program, warning of supply shortages measured in "days if not weeks."
Wall Street identified MP Materials as America’s answer. Operating the only large-scale rare earth mine in the Western Hemisphere, the company secured a $400 million Defense Department investment in July, making Uncle Sam its largest shareholder. Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL) followed with a $500 million magnet supply contract. President Trump personally championed the company as critical to national security.
The stock surged from $16.39 on January 1 to $98.65 by October 14, a sixfold increase in ten months. At its peak, MP Materials commanded a $17 billion market capitalization.
Then mathematics reasserted itself.
MP Materials surged 318% year-to-date but fell 30% from its October peak, illustrating the extreme volatility facing rare earth investors
The Valuation Reality Check
Multiple independent discounted cash flow analyses published in recent weeks calculated MP Materials’ fair value between $2.36 and $65 per share. Even the most generous model suggested 400% overvaluation. The most conservative implied the stock traded 4,000% above intrinsic value.
The company currently trades at approximately 52 times its enterprise value to EBITDA ratio, roughly double typical materials sector multiples. This assumes optimistic profitability projections for a company generating negative free cash flow of $260 million annually.
Even bullish analysts projecting $140 to $150 price targets acknowledge these depend on perfect execution of an extraordinarily difficult industrial buildout over three to five years. Any delays, cost overruns, or rare earth price shifts could collapse those projections.
The core problem: MP Materials can mine rare earths, but currently lacks processing capability to produce the high purity magnets defense contractors and Apple require. The company’s new magnet manufacturing facility won’t reach full operational capacity until 2028.
The Timeline Trap
This exposes the central flaw in the bullish thesis. China’s export restrictions took effect October 2025. Defense contractors’ existing stockpiles will likely exhaust between late 2025 and mid 2026. MP Materials won’t have scaled magnet production until 2028.
There’s a two-to-three-year gap between crisis and domestic solution. During this window, America remains dependent on whatever deals the administration negotiates with China, alternative Australian supplies, or emergency measures like recycling retired weapons systems.
For investors, the "national security premium" baked into MP Materials’ valuation assumes the company will complete a massive industrial facility on time and under budget, secure reliable raw material supplies, achieve defense grade quality standards, and capture meaningful market share while Chinese competitors with thirty years of manufacturing experience can undercut on price whenever strategically convenient.
The Pattern Behind the Bubble
The rare earths crisis shows how authentic strategic concerns create speculative environments. The supply problem is real. China does control critical supply chains. America does need domestic alternatives. But market price and intrinsic value are distinct concepts.
Patriotic narratives wrapped around genuine crises create powerful psychological forces. Investors feel they’re supporting national security while pursuing returns. Skepticism appears unpatriotic. FOMO intensifies as the stock surges. Traditional valuation metrics seem outdated when "national security" justifies any multiple.
This pattern repeats across markets. Defense stocks during wartime. Cybersecurity after major breaches. Infrastructure companies following disaster. The crisis is real. The opportunity is real. But the initial market reaction typically overshoots fundamental value, creating profitable entry points only after corrections.
The Measured Alternative
A safer idea for investors seeking rare earth exposure without concentration risk would be to consider the VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF (NYSE:REMX), up 24.8% year to date. The fund provides diversified exposure across global rare earth miners, including Australian, Canadian, and other non Chinese firms. When one company disappoints, others may compensate.
Defense contractor ETFs like the SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (NYSE:XAR), up nearly 36% this year, present another angle. These funds hold companies like Lockheed Martin (NYSE:LMT) and Rtx Corp (NYSE:RTX), firms that need rare earths but have the scale, classified stockpiles, and government backing to manage supply disruptions. Defense spending continues regardless of rare earth sourcing.
China’s control over rare earth supply chains intensifies at each stage of the supply chain, from 70% in mining, to 90% in processing, to a chokehold 93% in magnet manufacturing (the most critical stage for defense applications).
Key Levels and Catalysts Ahead
MP Materials closed at $68.26 on October 23. Technical support appears around $55 to $60, representing the July August consolidation zone before the parabolic move. The 200 day moving average sits near $42.
Critical catalysts include:
- Q4 2025 Production Reports: Any delays or cost overruns in magnet facility construction will pressure valuation
- China U.S. Negotiations: Trade deal progress could reduce the national security premium
- Defense Stockpile Updates: Pentagon announcements on rare earth reserve levels
- 2026 Earnings Guidance: Management’s timeline and cost projections for reaching scaled production
The stock needs operational execution, not higher multiples, to reward current buyers. If the company delivers perfectly on an aggressive three year buildout while maintaining margins against Chinese competition, today’s valuation might prove justified. If it stumbles, significant downside remains.
What MP Materials Gets Right and Wrong
MP Materials represents something real. America’s rare earth dependence on China creates legitimate national security vulnerabilities that require solutions. The company owns valuable assets and secured meaningful government and corporate partnerships.
But real strategic value doesn’t equal appropriate stock price at any given moment. The company’s current market cap prices in best case scenarios with minimal room for execution delays, cost increases, or competitive pressures. That’s speculation, not analysis.
Investors who bought at $20 or $30 captured the legitimate rerating of a strategic asset. Those buying at $70 or $80 are betting everything goes according to plan for three straight years. History suggests manufacturing buildouts rarely meet aggressive timelines, especially in industries where America surrendered technological leadership decades ago.
The math is still the same. The fundamentals haven’t changed. What changed is sentiment, and sentiment reverses faster than three-year construction projects complete. When national security becomes your primary investment thesis instead of cash flows and margins, you’re playing a new game with different risks. So, make sure you know which game you’re actually playing.