Earnings call transcript: InTest Corporation Q2 2025 sees EPS beat, stock rises

Published 06/08/2025, 14:40
Earnings call transcript: InTest Corporation Q2 2025 sees EPS beat, stock rises

InTest Corporation reported its Q2 2025 earnings, surpassing expectations with an adjusted EPS of $0.03 against a forecasted loss of $0.03. Revenue reached $28.1 million, slightly ahead of the $28 million forecast. This positive surprise led to a pre-market stock price increase of 2.02%, with shares trading at $7.07. According to InvestingPro data, the company maintains strong liquidity with a current ratio of 2.39, indicating robust short-term financial health.

Key Takeaways

  • InTest’s adjusted EPS exceeded expectations, leading to a positive market reaction.
  • Revenue was slightly above forecasts, contributing to investor confidence.
  • The company continues to reduce debt, improving its financial health.
  • New product sales accounted for 21% of total sales, aligning with strategic goals.
  • The Malaysian facility is on track to expand production capacity.

Company Performance

InTest Corporation demonstrated resilience in Q2 2025, with revenue slightly surpassing expectations and a notable improvement in adjusted EPS. The company’s focus on debt reduction and new product innovation has positioned it well despite ongoing global economic uncertainties. The strategic expansion in Malaysia and product diversification efforts are expected to drive future growth.

Financial Highlights

  • Revenue: $28.1 million, slightly above the forecast of $28 million.
  • Adjusted EPS: $0.03, compared to the forecasted loss of $0.03.
  • Gross Margin: 42.6%, improving by 110 basis points sequentially.
  • Net Loss: $500,000, or -$0.04 per diluted share.
  • Debt Reduction: $4.9 million year-to-date, with total debt at $10.1 million.

Earnings vs. Forecast

InTest’s Q2 2025 earnings beat expectations with an adjusted EPS of $0.03, a significant improvement over the forecasted loss of $0.03. This represents a 200% positive surprise. Revenue closely aligned with projections, slightly exceeding the $28 million forecast. With a market capitalization of $89.08 million, InTest operates with a moderate level of debt, as revealed in InvestingPro’s comprehensive analysis, which includes 12 additional key insights about the company’s financial position.

Market Reaction

Following the earnings release, InTest’s stock rose 2.02% in pre-market trading, reaching $7.07. This increase reflects investor optimism driven by the EPS beat and the company’s strategic initiatives. The stock remains within its 52-week range of $5.24-$9.77, with a beta of 1.55 indicating higher volatility than the broader market. According to InvestingPro’s Fair Value analysis, the stock currently appears undervalued, with analyst price targets ranging from $8 to $12.

Outlook & Guidance

InTest forecasts Q3 2025 revenue between $28 million and $30 million, anticipating modest quarter-over-quarter improvements. The company remains focused on cost management and market diversification, with expectations for a potential semiconductor market recovery in 2026. For deeper insights into InTest’s financial health and growth prospects, investors can access the detailed Pro Research Report available exclusively on InvestingPro, which covers over 1,400 US stocks with comprehensive analysis and actionable intelligence.

Executive Commentary

"We continue to expect sequential improvement in top line and profitability through the year," stated CFO Duncan Gilmore, highlighting the company’s positive outlook. CEO Nick Grant emphasized, "Our customer pipeline is at the highest level in the history of our company," underscoring growth potential.

Risks and Challenges

  • Global economic and tariff uncertainties may impact capital projects.
  • The semiconductor market remains weak, with recovery expected potentially in 2026.
  • Supply chain disruptions could affect production timelines and costs.
  • Increased competition in the automotive EV and defense markets.
  • Execution risks associated with geographic expansion and new product launches.

Q&A

Analysts inquired about recent defense orders, confirming they are follow-ups with existing customers. Questions also focused on the Malaysian facility’s role in regional growth and the company’s continued emphasis on new product development and market diversification.

Full transcript - inTest Corporation (INTT) Q2 2025:

Conference Operator: Greetings and welcome to the InTest Corporation Second Quarter twenty twenty five Financial Results Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen only mode. A brief question and answer session will follow the formal presentation. As a reminder, this conference is being recorded. It is now my pleasure to introduce your host, Sean Southard, Investor Relations for InTest.

Thank you. You may begin.

Sean Southard, Investor Relations, InTest Corporation: Good morning, everyone. We certainly appreciate your interest in INTEST Corporation, and thank you for sharing your time with us today. Joining me on our call are Nick Grant, our President and Chief Executive Officer and Duncan Gilmore, our Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer. You should have the earnings release that went out this morning, as well as the slides that will accompany our conversation today. If not, you can find these documents on the Investor Relations section of our website, intest.com.

Please turn to Slide two, as I review the Safe Harbor statement. During this call, management may make some forward looking statements about our current plans, beliefs and expectations. These statements apply to future events that are subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from what is stated here today. These risks, uncertainties and other factors are provided in the earnings release as well as in other documents filed by the company with the Securities and Exchange Commission. These documents can be found on our website or at sec.gov.

Also, as covered on Slide three, management will refer to some non GAAP financial measures. We believe these will be useful in evaluating our performance. However, you should not consider the presentation of this additional information in isolation or as a substitute for results prepared in accordance with GAAP. You can find reconciliations of non GAAP measures with comparable GAAP measures in the tables that accompany today’s release and slides. Now please turn to slide four.

I’ll turn it over to Nick. Nick, over to you.

Nick Grant, President and Chief Executive Officer, InTest Corporation: Thank you, Sean, and good morning, everyone. Thanks for joining us for our second quarter twenty twenty five earnings call. The second quarter played out pretty much as we expected. While the ongoing global economic and tariff uncertainties continued to drive customer hesitancy as it relates to moving forward with larger capital projects, we were able to deliver incremental improvement in the quarter. I want to take a moment and thank the entire nTest team for staying focused and delivering results through these continuing challenges.

We remain focused on driving innovation, market diversification and geographic expansion to strengthen our position in preparation for market improvements. In the quarter, nTest delivered just over $28,000,000 in revenue with gross margins above 42% and received orders of nearly $28,000,000 as our recently introduced products continue to gain traction while our sales teams added new customers and optimized our channel network. Once again, our funnel of opportunities has increased to a new all time high as customers recognize our innovative solutions are integral to their long term capital plans. While overall semi and industrial markets remain sluggish, our teams are focused on capturing opportunities in other markets that are more active, like Defense Arrow. In the quarter, our process technologies division benefited from a meaningful commercial space order and as you probably noted, we just announced a large defense order at our environmental technologies division, which was a long time coming, for missile test systems to a prime defense contractor.

Also in the quarter, we saw order activity gaining traction in auto EV, which I’ll touch on shortly. During these times of uncertainty, we continue to take actions to improve profitability and we further reduced debt by $1,700,000 Year to date, we’ve reduced debt by nearly $5,000,000 bringing our total debt down to approximately $10,000,000 Please turn to slide five. We remain committed to our Vision 2030 strategic goal of driving innovation and geographic expansion to create greater scale. That can be seen in the progress we’re making building out our Malaysia facility. We announced this expansion at the 2023 and when the building was completed, we focused on adding engineering and supply chain talent to address our immediate bottlenecks.

The build out of the manufacturing space was recently completed and we remain on schedule to begin manufacturing first article products in this new facility during the second half of this year with production slated to ramp up in 2026. Our in the region for the region approach will enable us to better serve customers in the area, capitalize on a lower cost supply chain and capture logistics improvements that we expect will enhance our market competitiveness and drive growth. In addition, it will provide a lever we can use to better insulate us from potential tariff impacts. We believe the addition of manufacturing in Malaysia along with our expanded manufacturing footprint in Europe with AlphaMation positions us well to support the global needs of our customers. Let me now review orders and backlog on slide six.

Orders for the quarter of nearly $28,000,000 grew 10% sequentially reflecting strength in several markets. Demand in auto EV increased 40% to $7,100,000 Life Sciences more than doubled to 2,900,000 Safety and Security grew 74% to $1,200,000 while defense, aero, industrial and other markets also improved. Semi continued to remain weak with a decrease in orders of 24% sequentially. The $2,000,000 increase in auto EV demand was driven by wins with key tier one suppliers at our AlphaMation business for OEM 2027 model year program starts. In addition, AlphaMation made good progress diversifying their auto exposure with a key win in the life sciences space, resulting in that business achieving its highest level of orders since joining nTest.

The improved demand over the trailing quarter across all markets except semi reinforces that our ongoing diversification efforts are effective while the semi market remains sluggish. Year over year orders were up 6%. Auto EV demand grew $2,300,000 Life Sciences grew $1,800,000 Industrial rose $1,200,000 and Safety Security increased 1,000,000 These increases were partially offset as semi orders declined $3,700,000 and other markets declined $1,000,000 Defense Aero was essentially unchanged at 2,500,000.0 Backlog at June 30 was $37,900,000 essentially flat over the last two quarters. Backlog was $9,800,000 lower from the prior year period, which at the time reflected the large backlog we acquired with Alphamation. With that, let me turn it over to Duncan to review the financials and outlook with you in more detail.

Duncan, over to you.

Duncan Gilmore, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, InTest Corporation: Thank you, Nick. Starting on Slide seven. As Nick noted, revenue for the second quarter was $28,100,000 Sequentially, sales to semi increased 13% to GBP 10,200,000.0. Industrial improved 25% to GBP 3,800,000.0. DefenseAero increased 27% to GBP 3,600,000.0, and Safety and Security grew 59% to 900,000.0.

This growth more than outpaced the combined decline of 1,600,000 across life sciences, auto EV and other markets. Compared with Q2 twenty twenty four, revenue was down $5,900,000 driven by a $4,900,000 decline in auto EV sales and slight declines in life sciences, defense aerospace and other markets. This was partially offset by increases in industrial, safety security and semi, where the increase in back end sales outpaced the decline in front end. Moving to Slide eight. Second quarter gross profit of $12,000,000 increased 0.9 sequentially on higher sales volume, ongoing cost actions and the execution of tariff mitigation tactics.

Compared to the prior year period, it decreased $1,800,000 due to reduced volume. Q2 twenty twenty five gross margin of 42.6% improved 110 basis points sequentially, driven by improved volume and ongoing cost reductions. Compared with the prior year period, the 200 basis point improvement reflects a more favorable product mix combined with the impact of cost reduction efforts. As you can see on Slide nine, our operating expenses of GBP 12,900,000.0 also reflect recent cost reduction efforts with a sequential decrease of GBP 1,000,000, including the recently announced leadership transition. Year over year operating expenses decreased $600,000 We continue to implement a series of cost saving actions to improve our long term profitability.

The previously announced consolidation of our Videology Netherlands facility, which we estimate will translate into annualized savings of approximately $500,000 beginning in 2026 remains on track. In addition, we further reduced headcount during Q2 and employed austerity measures versus our budgeted 2025 spend. Turning to Slide 10, you can see our bottom line and adjusted EBITDA results. For the quarter, net loss was $500,000 or a loss of $04 per diluted share. Adjusted net earnings was $400,000 or a gain of $03 per diluted share.

Adjusted EPS reflects adding back acquired intangible amortization charges and restructuring costs. Adjusted EBITDA for Q2 was GBP 1,300,000.0. Slide 11 shows our capital structure and cash flow. In the 2025, we reduced debt by GBP 4,900,000.0, including the GBP 1,700,000.0 we paid down in the second quarter. Total debt was GBP 10,100,000.0 at quarter end.

We have a total debt leverage ratio of 1.4x. Cash and equivalents at the end of the second quarter were £19,200,000 down £2,800,000 from the end of the first quarter. On 08/05/2025, we entered into a covenant waiver agreement with our U. S.-based lender through the 2026 in exchange for pledging cash equal to U. S.

Debt outstanding. At 06/30/2025, we held $5,900,000 of U. S.-based debt. Regardless, we have more than sufficient liquidity given our net cash position. Turning to Slide 12.

As Nick mentioned, given the continued uncertainty resulting from the global trade environment, We are focusing our guidance on the forward quarter only where we have better visibility. For the third quarter, revenue is forecasted to be GBP 28,000,000 to 30,000,000, with gross margin similar to Q2 twenty twenty five and operating expenses of GBP 12,600,000.0 to £13,100,000 excluding approximately £100,000 of restructuring expenses. Amortization and interest expense are projected to be consistent with Q2. As usual, our guidance does not include the potential impact from any non operating expenses such as corporate development and incremental restructuring that may occur, nor does it include the potential impact from any additional acquisitions we may make. To reiterate, we continue to be confident in the long term fundamentals of our business and in our market position.

Our customer pipeline is at the highest level in the history of our company, While we continue to expect sequential improvement in top line and profitability through the year, our visibility into the timing of orders and shipments remains limited at this point. With that, if you will turn to Slide 13, I will now turn the call back over to Nick.

Nick Grant, President and Chief Executive Officer, InTest Corporation: Thanks, Duncan. With the continually changing trade conditions, companies around the world are adjusting to new market dynamics impacting pricing, supply chains, manufacturing decisions and more, which is driving many customers to remain hesitant to invest in capital projects. As they remain cautious, we continue to make progress on our Vision 2030 growth strategy and are encouraged by wins across several markets where our diversification has proven effective, our innovative new products are gaining traction and our geographic reach extends continuously further. During the second quarter, new products represent sales of $6,000,000 which was just over 20% of our total sales. One of our Vision 2030 goals is to get this vitality metric to 25% in the coming years and we’re pleased with the solid progress we are making.

As we have stated, the opportunity funnel across the organization has reached a new all time high, maintaining optimism about a pending increase in capital spending. In the meantime, we are managing cost while positioning us to be ready to capture the growth when it comes. We have a healthy balance sheet and as Duncan noted, believe we have sufficient liquidity to manage whatever challenges the future may hold. While visibility remains limited amid persistently weak market conditions for capital investment, most notably in the digital analog semi industry, we expect to deliver modest quarter over quarter improvement throughout 2025. With that, operator, let’s open the lines for questions.

Conference Operator: Thank you. We will now be conducting a question and answer session. If you would like to ask a question, please press star one on your telephone keypad. The first question is from Jason Schmidt from Lake Street Capital Markets. Please go ahead.

Jason Schmidt, Analyst, Lake Street Capital Markets: Questions. I just want to start with today’s announcement on that defense order. Is this a brand new customer for you guys? And I guess, relatedly, why did you win?

Nick Grant, President and Chief Executive Officer, InTest Corporation: Hey. Good morning, Jason. And, yes, this customer is an existing customer of ours. We actually delivered, three systems back at the end of Q in 2024. And this is a follow on those from the prototype units that were delivered.

So we have a long standing relationship with this customer, did a number of the first generation test systems and now they’re ramping up next gen systems as well as volumes.

Jason Schmidt, Analyst, Lake Street Capital Markets: Got you. And then understanding sort of the dynamics you laid out for the outlook, but just curious if you could comment on how customer order patterns have been so far for the first six weeks of this quarter?

Nick Grant, President and Chief Executive Officer, InTest Corporation: Yes, we’re really pleased with the order pattern we’re seeing typically as we’ve talked about in the past. The first month is softer and it continues to improve throughout the quarter. We’ve had a really solid start over the first few weeks here

Ted Jackson, Analyst, Northland Securities: of the

Nick Grant, President and Chief Executive Officer, InTest Corporation: quarter. So encouraged, we continue to see the automotive industry investing for their 2027 model year programs. The defense space remains very active and of course, this order helps in that. But yes, very encouraged by the start here in Q3.

Jason Schmidt, Analyst, Lake Street Capital Markets: Okay. That’s good to hear. And then just the last one for me, and I’ll jump back into queue. Can you remind us what the capacity will be in the Malaysian facility? I know it will vary by given sort of product mix, but at a high level, how should we think about capacity?

Nick Grant, President and Chief Executive Officer, InTest Corporation: Good question there. The guys have all kind of identified some products that they will start making out of there and of course we’ll ramp up more over time to better support that region. But we anticipate that facility to be able to do $10,000,000 $15,000,000 for us over time here out of to support the Asian market.

Jason Schmidt, Analyst, Lake Street Capital Markets: Okay, really helpful. Thanks a lot, guys.

Conference Operator: The next question is from Dick Ryan from Oak Ridge Financial. Please go ahead.

Dick Ryan, Analyst, Oak Ridge Financial: Thank you. So Nick, the coming out of Q1, you had those environmental challenges that kind of pushed some business, but then you had these strong defense orders coming in for the division. Were those engineering challenges related to the defense side or were they something else? And where do you stand with those issues?

Nick Grant, President and Chief Executive Officer, InTest Corporation: Yes. The engineering challenges from Q1 were predominantly more industrial applications. Think a little bit on the defense, but the majority of those all shipped shortly after the end of the quarter and by mid quarter and that’s so, yeah, engineering challenges not an issue this quarter here as we do have a new leader at that location and he’s working to improve the coordination of the engineering efforts there.

Dick Ryan, Analyst, Oak Ridge Financial: Okay. That’s good to hear. On the semi side, you had a couple of comments towards the end on the back end business. Any glimpse into 2026, what could happen on the front end side of the business? Or is that still maybe a midyear sort of thing?

Nick Grant, President and Chief Executive Officer, InTest Corporation: Yeah. Our teams stay very active with the players in that space on next generation products. And their kind of locations, new locations and then where things they’re working on, looking at costing potentially improvements, etcetera, on the design side of things. So we’re working closely with all of them. As for timing, it clearly looks like it’s a 2026 kind of a rebound.

And whether it’s first half, second half, yet to be determined. I think it will slowly come back. But with ramping throughout ’26 and especially if we continue to see the automotive industry improving.

Dick Ryan, Analyst, Oak Ridge Financial: Okay. And one last one, mean, Alformation, obviously, it’s good to see the auto business and wins there. But on life sciences, can you provide some color what they’re providing to the life sciences and kind of the outlook you might have there? Is that kind of a one off sort of win? Or is there some continuation there that you might be expecting?

Nick Grant, President and Chief Executive Officer, InTest Corporation: Yes. The team is absolutely looking to drive further diversification. The wins that they saw here were kind of follow on some medical device electronics in the medical space there. And there’s a strong pipeline of continued follow on orders with this particular customer, but they are focused on other applications and their technology really lends itself nicely for this space as well from an electronic test perspective. So we’re focused on capturing the automotive as it comes back here, but also driving diversification.

Dick Ryan, Analyst, Oak Ridge Financial: Great. Well, appreciate that. And good job on a solid quarter here in outlook. Appreciate it, Nick. Thanks.

Nick Grant, President and Chief Executive Officer, InTest Corporation: Yes. Thanks, Dick.

Conference Operator: The next question is from Ted Jackson from Northland Securities. Please go ahead.

Ted Jackson, Analyst, Northland Securities: Thanks. Good morning.

Nick Grant, President and Chief Executive Officer, InTest Corporation: Hey, Ted. How are doing?

Ted Jackson, Analyst, Northland Securities: I’m pretty good for a busy day. It’s peak reporting season, but you know what, I’m up to the challenge. I wanted to start out, book to bill was about one and you’ve been basically knocking around one the last few quarters. And to me that tells me that you’ve got, let’s say, you’ve kind of come back where you’ve got a pretty decent annual around your business in terms of the near term. When you think about getting growth back in the business, we would expect to see that book to bill start trending up above that one.

And so for those of us that sit on the outside, are there things that we should be looking for that would be kind of leading indicators to say, hey, the order activity is really picking up? Could you kind of describe that a bit? Just give us some guideposts maybe? That would be my first question.

Nick Grant, President and Chief Executive Officer, InTest Corporation: Yes. We tried to provide a little bit kind of baseline for you here with kind of the new products. These are certainly positioning us well to create demand out there, win some new accounts. And we had really strong quarter there from in Q2, about $2,000,000 or a little less than $2,000,000 improvement over Q1 with new products and the more traction we gain will help drive the orders, push that orders above one on a book to bill basis there. With the pipeline being as in an all time high and continuing to grow each quarter, it gives us extreme confidence that as soon as these customers get

Duncan Gilmore, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, InTest Corporation: comfortable with the market dynamics and ready to kick off these CapEx projects, it’s going to generate good order demands for quarters to come here. Duncan, any thoughts from your side? I think we’ve seen some of it, the announcement on the defense aero order as an example, also seeing the alformation activity both auto and life sciences in that case picking up. Those are all positive signs. The front end world is not moving really right now in terms of customers actually placing orders.

Although as Nick indicated, there’s plenty of discussion, plenty of ongoing dialogue, just a case of capital investment kicking off again for another cycle down the road, but likely out into 2026. But that would be another space to keep an eye on. Back end, the back end semi was a little softer as we indicated this quarter. Again, I think seeing that in the marketplace across other analog mix signal test type players. But again, we expect to see that continue to pick back up as hopefully the global economy stabilizes a little bit more certainty and people start know where to place their bets from a capital investment perspective.

Ted Jackson, Analyst, Northland Securities: On the defense order, I probably already know the answer, just given kind of what your orders were for the quarter. But did that order happen in the third quarter and hence we would see a pickup in terms of all else being equal, the Defense Aerospace orders line when you report your third quarter?

Nick Grant, President and Chief Executive Officer, InTest Corporation: Yes, it was a Q3 order that came in.

Ted Jackson, Analyst, Northland Securities: Okay. Then a question for both of you on OpEx. Mean, honestly, mean, expense control, it was lower than I expected it to be. Duncan, you talked about some headcount and reduction and austerity measures. Can you kind of walk through what you’re doing in terms of bringing those costs down?

How much of that savings is permanent in nature? And how much of it will turn around once we kind of get to a more normalized market where growth returns? And then I have one more after this.

Duncan Gilmore, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, InTest Corporation: Yeah, I mean a lot of it is so I mentioned headcounts. We have been reducing headcount steadily over really the last number of quarters as volumes have dropped, direct labor, some of the operational overheads, headcount has dropped. Year over year, we’re probably down around 50 heads across the global organization, Q2 versus Q1 probably around 15 heads with a lot of those in direct labor overhead type positions. We’ve been adding slowly where we’ve seen attrition. We obviously will continue to replace positions that are needed.

And then discretionary spending areas like travel, marketing spend, trade shows, things like that we have been tampering down, holding back on. We would expect to continue to invest in those spaces and increase that as activity levels dictate. So to answer the second part of your question, some of that will come back as we see volumes pick back up. A couple of the other things we referenced Videology operational restructuring, those savings kick in 2026. That’s a longer term initiative that we’re driving.

And we also did have in Q2, we did announce a small executive restructuring. We reduced our executive headcount by one with Rich Rogoff who was in the dedicated M and A role moving into the environmental technologies leadership role, which led to a net headcount reduction across the executive team of one. So, are all examples of things that we’ve been doing. I’d say more skewed towards the temporary than the permanent, but we’re very focused as you can see on spend control as we see as the top line is a little softer.

Ted Jackson, Analyst, Northland Securities: Okay. And then my last question, touching back over to the Malaysian operations as you ramp that up, kind of a give and take. How much of as you ramp up manufacturing of product in there, how much of your, I don’t know, call it revenue or however you wanna think of it, volume is going to be transferred from existing facilities in there. And then what will the net of that be with regards to margin as you kind of basically take absorption down, if you would, in some areas and then improve it, obviously, in Malaysia. And then when you talk about getting that to 10,000,000 or $15,000,000 in revenue, when do you see that happening?

Nick Grant, President and Chief Executive Officer, InTest Corporation: Yes, so we’re focused on really driving growth out of that facility by better serving customers in the region, allowing us to be more competitive from a price position with a better supply chain cost base and lower labor cost on that. So it’s not like we’re going to be shifting a whole bunch of operations out of The U. S. Over there. We will support some customers that are have facilities in those regions out of that site.

But we also anticipate this regionalization effort for bringing more activity back to The U. S. Will give us the capacity to keep our existing facilities leveraged out there. So, yes, it’s about a growth story, better competitiveness in the region and getting aggressive after the competition to drive top line. As for timing, it will be a ramp up.

The groups laid out kind of a five year plan here that will move to those kind of numbers over during that timeframe. But obviously, things can change in two, three years down the road. And as I mentioned in the opening statements, if we need to do something from a tariff kind of lever that we could pull to better serve customers and minimize our costs going up as a result of tariffs, we have that lever to pull as well down the road.

Ted Jackson, Analyst, Northland Securities: Okay. Well, it was a nice solid quarter and appreciate the good guidance. And I know things will turn around and you guys are pulling all the levers you can, it sounds like. So thanks for the time.

Jason Schmidt, Analyst, Lake Street Capital Markets: Thanks, Ted.

Conference Operator: There are no further questions at this time. I would like to turn the floor back over to Nick Grant for closing comments.

Nick Grant, President and Chief Executive Officer, InTest Corporation: Thank you, Sassy. We appreciate you joining us today. Thank you for your time and we welcome the opportunity to answer any further questions you may have. On slide 14, please note that in addition to the details regarding the replay of this call, we will be participating in several upcoming conferences later this month and next. Thanks again for participating today and have a great day.

Conference Operator: This concludes today’s teleconference. You may disconnect your lines at this time. Thank you for your participation.

This article was generated with the support of AI and reviewed by an editor. For more information see our T&C.

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers
© 2007-2025 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.