BofA update shows where active managers are putting money
Paysign Inc. (market cap: $386.57M) reported its second-quarter 2025 earnings, showcasing a record revenue of $19.1 million, surpassing forecasts of $18.67 million. The earnings per share (EPS) fell short of expectations, coming in at $0.02 compared to the forecasted $0.03. Trading at a P/E ratio of 61.6x, the stock saw a slight decline of 0.56% during regular trading hours but rose by 1.96% in aftermarket trading, reflecting mixed investor sentiment.
InvestingPro analysis reveals several promising indicators for Paysign, including expected net income growth and strong market performance. Subscribers can access 10+ additional exclusive ProTips for deeper insights into PAYS’s potential.
Key Takeaways
- Paysign reported record revenue, exceeding expectations by 2.2%.
- EPS missed forecasts by 33.33%.
- The company’s gross profit margin improved to 61.6%.
- Paysign launched several new programs and expanded its technological offerings.
- The stock experienced a modest rise in aftermarket trading.
Company Performance
Paysign demonstrated a strong performance in Q2 2025, with revenue increasing by 33.1% year-over-year. The stock has delivered impressive returns, surging 163.7% over the past six months and 135.76% year-to-date. The company’s focus on innovation and expansion into new service areas has driven significant growth, particularly in its patient affordability programs. Despite challenges in the plasma sector due to oversupply, Paysign maintained a competitive edge with a market share of approximately 50%.
Financial Highlights
- Revenue: $19.1 million, up 33.1% year-over-year
- Earnings per share: $0.02, a decrease from the forecasted $0.03
- Gross profit margin: 61.6%, up from 52.9% in the previous year
- Net income: $1.4 million, nearly doubling from the previous year
- Adjusted EBITDA: $4.5 million, a 102% increase
Earnings vs. Forecast
Paysign’s revenue exceeded expectations, with a surprise of 2.2%. However, the EPS fell short by 33.33%, which might have tempered investor enthusiasm. This miss contrasts with the company’s historical performance, where it has typically met or exceeded earnings forecasts.
Market Reaction
The company’s stock closed down 0.56% during regular trading hours but rebounded by 1.96% in aftermarket trading. This movement suggests that while the EPS miss may have initially concerned investors, the strong revenue performance and positive future outlook helped regain confidence. According to InvestingPro data, analysts have set price targets ranging from $7.00 to $9.50, indicating potential upside from current levels. The stock’s Fair Value analysis suggests it is currently fairly valued.
Outlook & Guidance
Paysign provided a positive outlook for the remainder of 2025, with revenue guidance set between $76.5 million and $78.5 million, indicating a growth of 32.7% at the midpoint. InvestingPro’s comprehensive analysis rates Paysign’s overall financial health as "GOOD" with a score of 2.61, supporting the company’s growth trajectory. For detailed insights into Paysign’s financial health and growth potential, investors can access the exclusive Pro Research Report, part of InvestingPro’s coverage of 1,400+ US stocks. The company expects net income to range from $6 million to $7 million, with adjusted EBITDA projected between $18 million and $20 million. The patient affordability segment is anticipated to grow by 145%, becoming a significant revenue driver.
Executive Commentary
CEO Mark Newcomer highlighted the company’s strategic shift from merely processing payments to reshaping financial support in healthcare, emphasizing innovation and technology as key growth drivers. CFO Jeff Baker noted the balanced revenue streams and the company’s ability to adapt to market changes.
Risks and Challenges
- Plasma market oversupply could impact profitability.
- Dependence on the patient affordability segment for growth.
- Potential integration challenges with new technologies.
- Economic uncertainties that could affect consumer spending.
Q&A
During the earnings call, analysts inquired about the mix of new and transitioning pharmaceutical programs, revenue sources in patient affordability, and the plasma center consolidation strategy. Paysign addressed these concerns, emphasizing its strategic initiatives to maintain growth and market share.
Full transcript - Paysign Inc (PAYS) Q2 2025:
Kevin, Conference Operator: Good afternoon. My name is Kevin, and I’ll be your conference operator today. At this time, I’d like to welcome everyone to the PaySign, Inc. Second Quarter twenty twenty five Earnings Conference Call. After the speakers’ remarks, there will be a question and answer session.
As a reminder, this conference call is being recorded. The comments on today’s call regarding PaySign’s financial results will be on a GAAP basis unless otherwise noted. PaySign’s earnings release was disseminated to the SEC earlier today and can be found on the Investor Relations section of our website, paysign.com, which includes reconciliations of non GAAP measures to GAAP reported amounts. Additionally, as set forth in more detail in our earnings release, I’d like to remind everyone that today’s call will include forward looking statements regarding PaySign’s future performance. Actual performance could differ materially from these forward looking statements.
Information about the factors that could affect future performance is summarized at the end of earnings release and in our recent SEC filings. Lastly, a replay of this call will be available until 11/05/2025. Please see PaySign’s second quarter twenty twenty five earnings call announcement for details on how to access the replay. It’s now my pleasure to turn the call over to Mr. Marc Newcomer, President and CEO.
Please go ahead.
Mark Newcomer, President and CEO, PaySign: Thank you, Kevin, and good afternoon, everyone. Thank you for joining us as we review our second quarter twenty twenty five results. I’m Mark Newcomer, President and CEO of PaySign. Joining me today is our CFO, Jeff Baker along with Matt Turner, President of Patient Affordability and Matt Lanford, our Chief Payments Officer, who will be available for Q and A. This was another standout quarter for PaySign.
Earlier today, we reported record revenue of $19,100,000 up 33% compared to the second quarter last year and a meaningful improvement in gross margins raising eight seventy basis points to 61.6%. Even with one time expenses of about $300,000 related to the onboarding of 123 transitioning plasma centers late in the quarter, we doubled adjusted EBITDA to $4,500,000 up 102% from second quarter twenty twenty four and nearly doubled net income to $1,400,000 up 99% from second quarter twenty twenty four. Our patient affordability business is driving much of this momentum. Revenue grew 190% year over year to $7,750,000 and revenue per program rose over 83%, reflecting the strong confidence our pharmaceutical partners place in our solutions as claims process grew by more than 80%. We launched seven programs this quarter, 21 in the first half of the year, already surpassing last year’s pace of 18 programs launched, exiting the quarter with 97 active programs, while expecting another 30 to 40 programs prior to year end.
Our pipeline remains robust with demand accelerating from both new and existing clients where over half are transition programs, which ramp very quickly. The fact that existing clients are expanding their programs with us is one of the strongest validations of our ability to scale, deliver results and solve real industry challenges. In order to meet this growing demand, we are planning to open a new state of the art patient services contact center during the third quarter. This facility will increase our support capacity fourfold, ensuring our ability to effectively scale operations and ensure the highest level of service for both pharmaceutical companies and patients. One of our biggest differentiators responsible for this surge in demand is our proprietary dynamic business rules technology.
DBR operates in real time during the point of sale adjudication process, helping manufacturers and patients overcome tactics used by co pay maximizers, ensuring Assistant reaches patients as intended. It’s innovation where few people see it inside the transaction itself and it’s making a meaningful difference by generating significant savings for pharmaceutical manufacturers. Overall, we’re not just moving payments, we’re reshaping how financial support is delivered within healthcare, removing financial barriers to treatment and providing measurable savings to patients in need and pharmaceutical manufacturers. We remain extremely pleased with the performance of our patient affordability business and expect this continued growth trajectory well into the 2026 and beyond. In our plasma compensation business, revenue was $10,700,000 down 4.7 year over year, but up 14.2% sequentially.
We ended the second quarter with six zero seven centers having onboarded 123 of the 132 centers awarded to us in mid June, bringing our market share to approximately 50. We expect to onboard an additional 10 to 13 centers in the second half of the year. We were recently informed that a plasma customer will be closing 22 underperforming donation centers as of August 15. We believe that a majority of those donors will continue to donate at nearby centers. Additionally, an existing client has also informed us of their intention to open six to eight new centers in the next ten months as well as an additional six to eight centers in the following year.
As we previously noted, the plasma business continues to face headwinds driven by an oversupply of source plasma and increased collection efficiencies at the center level. While these pressures will likely persist through 2025, we anticipate a return to organic center level growth to start during 2026 as the plasma collection cycle improves. In the meantime, we’re confident that addition of 132 newly awarded centers, 123 that went live late June and nine that went live late July will return the business to year over year revenue growth. This positions us exceptionally well to capture additional upside when the industry enters its next growth cycle. Major part of our strategy is to expand our value proposition in plasma with new software solutions.
In May at the International Plasma Protein Congress held in Warsaw, Poland, we introduced a software as a service engagement platform, including a donor app, a plasma specific CRM and a donor management system. The response has been overwhelmingly positive both domestically and internationally as we are in discussions with plasma collectors and device manufacturers. This is an exciting step in evolving from a trusted payments partner to a broader technology provider for the industry. We look forward to keeping you apprised of our progress in the coming quarters. To close, Q2 was another quarter of strong execution and innovation.
We’re scaling efficiently to meet the growing demand, expand our presence in both patient affordability and plasma with solutions that are built for impact. I’m incredibly proud of our team’s focus and determination and I’m excited about the opportunities ahead. We remain confident in our trajectory and committed to delivering long term value for our shareholders. With that, I’ll turn it over to Jeff for a closer look at the financials. Jeff?
Jeff Baker, CFO, PaySign: Thank you, Mark. Good afternoon, everyone. As Mark said, we had an exciting second quarter with a lot of positive activity across both major areas of our business. We had some really nice wins in our patient affordability business that will enable us to continue the momentum we have experienced in the first half of the year into the second half of the year and into 2026. We had the addition of 132 plasma centers, 123 of which went live late in the quarter that should provide additional momentum through the end of this year and into 2026 as oversupply of inventory levels normalize.
We could not be more excited about the prospects of our business for the remainder of this year and throughout 2026. I encourage everyone to read our 10 Q for more details about our financial results, which is expected to be filed tomorrow morning before the market opens. Now turning your attention to the results for the second quarter. Results were in line with the guidance we provided last quarter despite unexpected pleasant upfront costs we absorbed to launch the 123 new plasma centers late in the quarter. These costs far outweigh the slight revenue benefit we received during the quarter, but we expect that to swing the other way in the second half of the year.
Second quarter twenty twenty five total revenues of $19,100,000 increased 4,700,000 or 33.1%. Plasma revenue declined 4.7% to $10,700,000 and our revenue per plasma center declined to $7,098 We added 123 net plasma centers exiting the quarter with six zero seven centers. Gross dollars loaded to cards decreased 3.7%, total number of loads decreased 4.6% and gross spend volume decreased 6.3%. Moving to our Pharma Patient Affordability business. Second quarter Pharma revenues of $7,800,000 was up 190% and accounted for 40.6% of quarterly revenues.
This is a significant increase from the 18.7% of revenue that pharma represented during the same period last year. We added seven net programs exiting the quarter with 97 pharma patient affordability programs and grew the number of claims processed by over 80% versus the same period last year. Gross profit margin for the quarter was 61.6% versus 52.9% during the same period last year. Our gross profit margin was negatively impacted by the upfront costs that were just mentioned. SG and A for the quarter, excluding depreciation and amortization and stock based compensation, increased 35.4% to $7,200,000 with total operating expenses increasing 38.3% to $10,300,000 Having made significant investments in our employee base over the past year to support the continued growth in our businesses, compensation and benefits increased just under $1,000,000 We exited this quarter with 191 employees versus 149 employees during the same period last year.
Stock compensation increased $284,000 while we started seeing the operational benefits from our Gamma transactions as our capitalized software costs declined by $369,000 Depreciation and amortization expense increased $680,000 due to the continued enhancements in our technology platform. Net income for the quarter was $1,400,000 or $02 per fully diluted share versus $697,000 or $01 per fully diluted share for the same period last year. Negatively impacting the per share amount was lower interest income related to the implied interest expense on future cash payments for the Gamma acquisition. Lower interest rates and average bank balances primarily from our plasma customers at our sponsor bank higher income tax provision of $655,000 or 32.1%, reflecting the impact of discrete items related to the appreciation of our stock price during the quarter and higher diluted shares outstanding related to in the money options. Second quarter adjusted EBITDA which is a non GAAP measure that adds back stock compensation to EBITDA, was $4,500,000 or $08 per diluted share versus $2,200,000 or $04 per diluted share for the same period last year.
The fully diluted share count for the quarter used in calculating per share amounts was 57,900,000.0 and 55,900,000.0, respectively. Regarding the health of our company, we exited the quarter with $11,800,000 in unrestricted cash and zero debt. The operational benefits of our Gamma acquisition are beginning to show up in our unrestricted cash balances, which increased by just under $1,000,000 from the end of the year and $4,900,000 from the first quarter. We now expect our annual cash cost savings from this acquisition to be at the high end of the 4,000,000 to $5,000,000 guidance we gave at the end of last quarter. And as Mark mentioned, we couldn’t be more excited about the early sales momentum we are building from existing and non existing plasma companies.
Now turning your attention to our revised guidance for 2025, which now incorporates Q2 actual results. We are raising our revenue guidance to be in the range of $76,500,000 to $78,500,000 reflecting year over year growth of 32.7% at the midpoint. Plasma is expected to make up approximately 56% of total revenue representing flat year over year growth, while pharma patient affordability revenue is expected to make up approximately 40.5% of total revenue representing year over year growth of over 145%. Despite the seasonality we typically see in our patient affordability business and industry trends in our plasma business, we now forecast revenue to grow in the second half of the year compared to the first half of the year. Full year gross profit margins are expected to be between 6162% as we bring up a new state of the art patient services contact center during the third quarter to support the growth in our business.
We continue to expect operating expenses to be between $41,000,000 and $43,000,000 with depreciation and amortization expense of approximately $8,400,000 and stock based compensation of approximately $4,400,000 Interest income is estimated to be approximately $2,500,000 reflecting the implied interest expense for future Gamma payments and lower bank balances from our plasma customers. Taking all the factors above in consideration, we continue to expect net income to be between $6,000,000 and $7,000,000 for the year or $0.10 to $0.12 per diluted share, but that may fluctuate depending on our effective tax rate. Adjusted EBITDA is expected to be in the range of $18,000,000 to $20,000,000 or dollars to $0.35 per diluted share. The diluted share count for the year is estimated to be 57,500,000.0 shares. For the 2025, we expect total revenue to be in the range of $19,500,000 to $20,500,000 reflecting continued strength for our patient affordability business and the contribution of the nine additional plasma centers added July 21, offset by the reduction of 22 underperforming plasma centers on August 15.
We expect to exit the third quarter with approximately five ninety five plasma centers. We expect plasma revenues to be approximately 60% of revenue and patient affordability to be approximately 37% of revenue. Gross profit margins are expected to be approximately 59% due to the higher mix of plasma revenue and the launch of the new patient services contact center. Operating expenses are expected to be between $10,500,000 and $11,500,000 of which depreciation and amortization will be approximately $2,200,000 and stock based compensation will approximately 1,400,000 Adjusted EBITDA is expected to be in the range of $4,500,000 to $5,000,000 or approximately 23.1% to 24.4% of revenue. With that, I would like to turn the call back over to Kevin for questions and answers.
Kevin, Conference Operator: Thank you. We’ll now be conducting a question and answer session. Our first question today is coming from Jacob Staphon from Lake Street Capital Markets. Your line is now live.
Jacob Staphon, Analyst, Lake Street Capital Markets: Hey, guys. Congrats on the quarter and solid outlook here. Maybe first for me, can you just touch on the 30 to 40 programs that you expect to onboard in pharma? Maybe help us understand better, are these more existing customers or new customers? Maybe help us kind of think through the dynamics there.
Matt Turner, President of Patient Affordability, PaySign: Hi, this is Matt Turner. Happy to take that question and thanks for asking. It represents a mix of new clients that we will be onboarding as well as additional programs from existing clients. It’s a pretty good mix between the two, would say about fifty-fifty.
Jacob Staphon, Analyst, Lake Street Capital Markets: Okay. And I guess to Mark’s point, are most of these transition programs or are some of them just new drug approvals from existing customers or what’s the outlook there?
Matt Turner, President of Patient Affordability, PaySign: Yes. I’m actually trying to pull up the numbers here specifically, so I can give you a good answer to that. It’s close to fifty-fifty as well as transitions versus launches. And probably, I would say, it’s going to lean to heavier on the transition side versus the launch.
Jacob Staphon, Analyst, Lake Street Capital Markets: Okay, great. Second one just for more of a clarification question. So on the plasma side, you expect to add kind of 10 to 14 programs throughout or centers throughout the remainder of the year. Does that include the nine that were onboarded after June 30? Or is that in addition to the full 132?
Mark Newcomer, President and CEO, PaySign: That does include the nine that we spoke about in the 01/1932.
Jacob Staphon, Analyst, Lake Street Capital Markets: Okay. Thanks. And then maybe if you could just kind of provide us an update on the donor management system timeline, FDA approval, anything to kind of timeline to look out for there?
Mark Newcomer, President and CEO, PaySign: We’re targeting currently towards the end of this year.
Gary Prestopino, Analyst, Barrington Research: Okay.
Mark Newcomer, President and CEO, PaySign: We’re expecting that we will be granted approval around that timeframe.
Jacob Staphon, Analyst, Lake Street Capital Markets: Okay. Got it. Maybe one more quick one. The gross margin impact here from the new center opening, I guess how much of the gross margin kind of impact will be from the new center versus kind of some of these additional costs that you saw in Q2?
Jeff Baker, CFO, PaySign: Jacob, I haven’t run the numbers like down to the percentage. Know the dollar amounts. I mean, it’s about additional $60,000 a month cost for the that’s just for the facility, but we’re going to have more bodies obviously that we’re adding in. Call center costs are going up because we’re having to add more bodies. It’s a very good problem to have and should I know for a fact it’s helped us win more business.
We’ve got customers in that patient in affordability business who definitely look to us for that strength. We’re not outsourcing this to third world country or any AI bots or anything like that, which is very important for the pharmaceutical world and the plasma world. They definitely want top notch services.
Jacob Staphon, Analyst, Lake Street Capital Markets: Yes. Okay. I appreciate all the color. Good luck going forward here, guys. Thank you.
Kevin, Conference Operator: Thank you. Next question today is coming from Gary Prestopino from Barrington Research. Your line is now live.
Gary Prestopino, Analyst, Barrington Research: Hi, good afternoon, everyone. Couple of questions on the plasma side. First of all, the new centers that you’re rolling out, how is their average revenue compare to your business that you have in hand right now?
Jeff Baker, CFO, PaySign: Gary, we expect them to be pretty much in line. It’s an existing customer, so we already have their trends that are in our numbers. We don’t see a huge discrepancy across the centers. Sometimes geographic locations will vary that. But these centers, it’s in the average and we expect that to be reflected in the numbers going forward.
Gary Prestopino, Analyst, Barrington Research: Okay. And then, you also mentioned that you expect the closing of these underperforming centers that, you will continue to keep these donors, with you. What are you doing specifically to do that? And were these centers that are closing, are they just in kind of densely populated areas and it was kind of duplicative and that’s why they were underperforming? I just want an idea of how you’re going to keep these people within your universe.
Mark Newcomer, President and CEO, PaySign: Yes. They were underperforming centers. They did it for many reasons, efficiencies and the like, not our decision, obviously. For the donors, the way we’re going to retain the donors is the donors that are losing those centers are going to go to centers that are close by, with the same client and with other people that we provide services to. And that’s why we expect to retain those donors.
Jeff Baker, CFO, PaySign: And Gary, remember, this happened this also happened back in I think it was 2023. Last time we had one of our customers shutter a number of centers, I think back then it was fifteen, sixteen, 16, believe. I have to go back and look. And the average revenue per center actually went up. I mean, those centers kind of pull down the average.
But we retained a high number of those donors, again, because there’s other centers in the vicinity and they just they’ll just move to a different center.
Gary Prestopino, Analyst, Barrington Research: Okay. Thank you. Yes.
Kevin, Conference Operator: The next question today is coming from Pete Heckmann from D. A. Davidson. Your line is now live.
Pete Heckmann, Analyst, D.A. Davidson: Good afternoon, everyone. Could you remind me or remind us in terms of how we think about breaking down revenue within pharma, how should we think about design and program design fees versus monthly maintenance versus claims or transaction fees? How do those play in? And I would assume it’s different for different types of programs, but when we hear that claims volume is up 80% year over year, but revenue is up more than double that, how should we think about reconciling the two numbers?
Matt Turner, President of Patient Affordability, PaySign: Yes. So this is Matt. Thanks for the question, Pete. You hit the nail on the head as far as we have program setup fees, we have monthly management fees and then a variety of different transactional fees across our ecosystem. So every pharmacy claim that comes in, that’s a paid or a paid claim that generates revenue on that claim.
If there are other features or functionality attached to that claim, we talked about dynamic business rules, that’s something that rides on top of the claim. There’s extra fees for those types of items. So while we’re going to make money on every paid claim when it comes in, there’s also other products and services overlaid on top of that claim that will generate additional revenue. So that’s why, yes, you’ll see there’s 80% increase in claims and a 200% increase in revenue because we’re able to add on these additional services to essentially make us more money along the way and provide more cost savings and efficiencies to our clients.
Pete Heckmann, Analyst, D.A. Davidson: Okay. And so
Jeff Baker, CFO, PaySign: And also, Pete, I was going to tell you, I think you’re also asking about kind of the mix. So the mix change is dependent on the time of the year. Obviously, more claims volume first half of the year as well as non claim revenue, you’ll see a heavier mix of that in the first half of the year versus the monthly management fees and setup fees. As you go to the second half of the year as some of the out of pocket maximums are hit and some other things we see claim volumes typically slow down and some of the other revenue items slow down, then you’ll see more monthly management and setup fees. So it’s kind of like it’s kind of as we grow, it’s becoming blended to the tune of about 20 to 30% of revenues coming from claims, 20% to 30% of revenues come from monthly management incentive fees and the remainder coming from non claim revenue.
So we’re getting a pretty good balance, especially if you look at it for the entirety of the year.
Pete Heckmann, Analyst, D.A. Davidson: Okay. That’s great. And then just thinking about the revenue per program in pharma, we’ve discussed how that’s not necessarily the greatest indicator, especially on a small base of programs. But when we look at that number, should we assume that the mix is shifting towards more specialty programs versus just retail?
Kevin, Conference Operator: Ladies and gentlemen, please stand by. We appear to have lost contact with our speakers. Please stand by while we reconnect. One moment please while we reconnect. Speakers have now rejoined.
Jeff Baker, CFO, PaySign: Pete, did you hear what I was saying?
Gary Prestopino, Analyst, Barrington Research: I On the mix?
Jeff Baker, CFO, PaySign: Okay. I’m sorry. Okay. We got cut off. So what I was saying is it depends on the time of the year.
Earlier in the year, first half of the year, you’re going to see more claims versus second half of the year as maximum out of pockets are reached. And you’ll see more monthly management fees monthly management and setup fees in the second half of the year usually than the first half of the year. What I was saying is though, we’re growing and getting to such a good sized portfolio that it’s pretty balanced. If you look out over the entirety of the year, it’s kind of 20% to 30% in claim revenue, 20% to 30% in monthly management and setup fees and the rest in non claim revenue. And like Matt told you, claim revenue can run the gamut of a lot of stuff that we do for these programs, call center, for example, or number of generation or faxes and everything it takes to run a program.
Pete Heckmann, Analyst, D.A. Davidson: Got it. Okay. And then my follow-up question, which I think I cut off, but just thinking about the over 90% increase in revenue per pharma program in the first half, should we infer from that that the mix is shifting towards more specialty or in physician office treatments? Or is that an incorrect assumption? Is it just there may be even maybe just some bigger retail drugs in there as well?
Matt Turner, President of Patient Affordability, PaySign: Yes. I think I don’t want to say that it’s because there’s like a push to more in office or specialty drugs. I would certainly say it’s not related to in office by the way because that would be more of a medical benefit product. If you look at the concentration of products that we have, our brands that we’re running programs for, on the specialty side, we do lean pretty heavy towards oncology, hematology type products, things like in the specialty realm. We do have a good chunk of retail business and that’s growing.
I think the push that you’re seeing in the kind of in the increase in revenue is the types of programs that we onboarded in Q4 of last year, are now fully up and running coming out of Q1 and Q2. And so some of the add on products like dynamic business rules will have an impact on the top line revenue numbers for those programs. So I think that’s where you’re seeing the some of the bigger jumps in numbers is because we have these other products and services that we’re able to offer and that in turn is having a very good impact on our or a very good result on our top line benefit.
Pete Heckmann, Analyst, D.A. Davidson: Okay. That makes sense. I appreciate it.
Kevin, Conference Operator: Thank you. We’ve reached the end of our question and answer session. I’d like to turn the floor back over for any further or closing comments.
Mark Newcomer, President and CEO, PaySign: Thanks, Kevin. To wrap up, Q2 was a breakout quarter for PaySign with record revenue, stronger margins and accelerating growth in patient affordability, underscoring the momentum we’re building. As we scale to meet rising demand and broaden our reach in the plasma industry and innovative technology, we remain confident in our strategy and excited about what lies ahead. I want to thank the entire PaySign team for their incredible focus execution and thank you all for joining us today and for your continued interest and support.
Kevin, Conference Operator: Thank you. That does conclude today’s teleconference and webcast. You may disconnect your line at this time and have a wonderful day. We thank you for your participation today.
This article was generated with the support of AI and reviewed by an editor. For more information see our T&C.